X
Story Stream
recent articles

The gap between economic data and its public interpretation is huge and getting bigger. As we approach another election cycle, it’s worth asking: what’s real, what’s political theater, and what does it all mean if Democrats regain control of the House?

At first glance, the national mood doesn’t make sense. Gas prices have eased, unemployment remains low, year-over-year wages are finally ticking upward in real terms, and yet the pervasive feeling—is one of decline. Stores are closing, home sales are plummeting even in supposedly recession-proof cities like Washington, D.C., and many Americans find themselves staring at grocery receipts that have ballooned since the pandemic. If you follow headlines, the economy is currently teetering on collapse. So, which is it?

Remember, good news is not newsworthy. It’s boring. Let’s start with the latest unemployment rate: which is 4.4%, or near the natural rate of unemployment. Inflation is 2.8%, near the Federal Reserve’s ideal rate. Economic growth in the 3rd quarter checked in at 4.4%, better than average. There’s nothing alarming about these numbers.

Economically, the United States is on surprisingly strong footing. Productivity is recovering from post-pandemic disruptions, and the dollar remains strong. And if you look at global trade flows, even some of the administration’s critics must admit that the dire predictions of a trade war or manufacturing collapse have not materialized. On top of that, real wages (which are adjusted for inflation) were up 1.1% in 2025.

But, enough of being boring. If you want headlines, we’ve got them for you!

We could go on, but you get the idea; reputable sources are peddling the narrative that the economy is wobbly.

So why does the public mood remain so bleak? Part of the answer lies in perception—and perception is power. Newsrooms thrive on crisis narratives. A shuttered big-box store in the suburbs or a “going out of business” sign downtown photographs better than a quiet report that factory orders are up 4%. The visual struggle dominates over the subtler indicators of recovery. And social media algorithmically amplifies bad news because outrage keeps users engaged.

There is also a collective hangover from the pandemic years. COVID-19 scrambled economic expectations and social confidence in ways that still ripple through daily life. Even with abundant jobs, many Americans are no longer confident that stability will last. Add to that political polarization, and every dip in the consumer confidence chart becomes an ideological battlefield.

The administration’s economic programs have emphasized faster growth and higher wages. Energy policy helped push gas prices below $3 nationwide, easing inflation. Deregulation and tax relief have supported strong private sector hiring, and the largest blue-collar wage gains in decades, lifting real earnings. This has resulted in GDP growth that has exceeded expectations, while stocks have reached record highs. Middle-class and small-business tax cuts, including no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security, boosted take-home pay. Trade enforcement, reshoring incentives, and deregulation attracted trillions in domestic investment and strengthened domestic manufacturing—painting a picture of long-term structural change rather than short-term relief.

Yet Americans don’t necessarily feel those gains. The benefits of policy tend to arrive slowly and quietly. The pain of inflation, on the other hand, is immediate and visible every time one swipes a card at the supermarket. Political credit rarely accrues to those building for the long future.

So, what happens if Democrats regain the House in 2026? Much depends on whether they treat the economy as a narrative to defend, or a system to adjust.

Some actions are expected: as Democrats gain more control they will push for more spending programs, ambitious climate initiatives, and expansive regulatory policies—all of which will reignite inflationary pressures and slow private-sector investment. The temptation to “do more” after reclaiming power may run counter to the need to let some of these existing programs mature. The economy, like a patient recovering from major surgery, needs time and consistency more than constant intervention.

What America faces today is not purely an economic problem but a trust problem. The numbers show recovery and resilience; the mood shows exhaustion and skepticism. The irony is that while the “doom” narrative dominates, the U.S. economy remains the envy of much of the world. Europe continues to flirt with stagnation. Meanwhile, America’s consumer-driven, innovation-rich system keeps generating an economic dynamism.

It may not feel like boom times—but feelings can mislead. The question for Democrats if they take the House isn’t whether they inherit a good economy, but whether they are willing to restore public faith in the one we already have.

Charity-Joy Acchiardo is a Faculty Fellow at the Civitas Institute and the Director of the Financial Responsibility and Economic Education Program at the University of Texas at Austin. G. Dirk Mateer is Faculty Fellow at the Civitas Institute and the Director of the Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Program at the University of Texas at Austin.


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments