The Bureau of Economic Analysis has released its annual data on compensation levels by industry (Tables 6.2D, 6.3D, and 6.6D here). The data show that the pay advantage enjoyed by federal civilian workers over private-sector workers continues to expand.
The George W. Bush years were very lucrative for federal workers. In 2000, the average compensation (wages and benefits) of federal workers was 66 percent higher than the average compensation in the U.S. private sector. The new data show that average federal compensation is now more than double the average in the private sector.
Figure 1 looks at average wages. In 2008, the average wage for 1.9 million federal civilian workers was $79,197, which compared to an average $49,935 for the nation's 108 million private sector workers (measured in full-time equivalents). The figure shows that the federal pay advantage (the gap between the lines) is steadily increasing.
Figure 2 shows that the federal advantage is even more pronounced when worker benefits are included. In 2008, federal worker compensation averaged a remarkable $119,982, which was more than double the private sector average of $59,909.
What is going on here? Members of Congress who have large numbers of federal workers in their districts relentlessly push for expanding federal worker compensation. Also, the Bush administration had little interest in fiscal restraint, and it usually got rolled by the federal unions. The result has been an increasingly overpaid elite of government workers, who are insulated from the economic reality of recessions and from the tough competitive climate of the private sector.
It's time to put a stop to this. Federal wages should be frozen for a period of years, at least until the private-sector economy has recovered and average workers start seeing some wage gains of their own. At the same time, gold-plated federal benefit packages should be scaled back as unaffordable given today's massive budget deficits. There are many qualitative benefits of government work"”such as extremely high job security"”so taxpayers should not have to pay for such lavish government pay packages.
Update: I respond to some criticisms of this post here.
Related Posts Federal Pay: Response to the CriticsTaxpayers and the Federal DiaryCash for Clunkers: Dumbest Program Ever?Government Employment Up or Down?Administration's Fiscal Muddle Related Content from Cato.org Rapid Reaction: McCain's FollyCitizens United v. Federal Election CommissionBigger Than MadoffThe Spending ThreatGreat Right North Cato Institute Home Contact Cato @ Liberty Cato on Facebook Cato on Twitter Cato on YouTube Cato Unbound - Leading Thinkers, Big Ideas Syndicate RSS Customize your Cato @ Liberty RSS feed
Receive Cato @ Liberty posts via email:
Delivered by FeedBurner
Recent Posts Meghan Cox Gurdon: Doesn’t Understand Terrorism British Economic Suicide Is $19,000 Per Student Enough to Run a School? FTC to Protect Us from Multi-Colored Beer Cans The Real Cost of College Aid Federal Pay: Response to the Critics U.S. to Share Biometric Data With Foreign Countries LA School District Vote Shows Further Cracks in Education’s Berlin Wall A New Book from David Boaz? Tax Tips for Democrats Have Mexican Dishwashers Brought California to Its Knees? Cato Tweets No public Twitter messages.Follow on Twitter
Cato Institute - 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. - Washington D.C 20001 var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-1677831-13"); // Cookied already: pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}
Receive Cato @ Liberty posts via email:
Delivered by FeedBurner
Follow on Twitter
Cato Institute - 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. - Washington D.C 20001 var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-1677831-13"); // Cookied already: pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} Read Full Article »
