President Barack Obama plans to announce in next year's State of the Union address that he wants to focus extensively on cutting the federal deficit in 2010 – and will downplay other new domestic spending beyond jobs programs, according to top aides involved in the planning.
The president's plan, which the officials said was under discussion before this month’s Democratic election setbacks, represents both a practical and a political calculation by this White House.
On the practical side, Obama has spent more money on new programs in nine months than Bill Clinton did in eight years, pushing the annual deficit to $1.4 trillion. This leaves little room for big spending initiatives.
On the political side, Obama can help moderate Democrats avoid some tough votes in an election year and, perhaps more importantly, calm the nerves of independent voters who are voicing big concerns with the big spending and deficits. Even if Obama succeeds - and that’s a big if - it will be tough for many Democrats to sell themselves as deeply concerned about spending after voting for the stimulus, the bailouts, the health care legislation and a plan to address global warming, four enormous government programs.
“Democrats have to reassure voters we are not being reckless,” said a Democratic official involved in the planning. “The White House knows this and that's why we'll be hearing a lot about reducing the deficit early next year. Democrats owned this issue for the past four years and cannot afford to cede it to Republicans now."
White House budget director Peter Orszag said in a statement to POLITICO: “The President strongly believes that as the recovery strengthens and job growth returns, we will have to take the tough steps necessary to return our nation to a fiscally disciplined and sustainable path. We recognize that the projected medium-term deficits are too high, and as part of the FY 2011 budget process, we are committed to bringing them down. Our challenge is to tackle those out-year deficits in a way and at a time that does not choke off economic recovery, and the FY 2011 budget will reflect our best judgment about how to walk that line."
The big question for Obama – and the country – is whether the sudden concern about deficits will be more rhetoric than reality once his first State of the Union address concludes.
All presidents promise deficit reduction – and almost always fall short. There is good reason to be skeptical of this White House, too, on its commitment.
For starters, the White House has not dropped plans for an aggressive global warming bill early next year that will be loaded with new spending on green technology and jobs – that would be paid for with tax increases. Democratic lobbyist Steve Elmendorf says the White House focus on deficit reduction could easily kill the cap-and-trade effort. “I think this means cap-and-trade has to go to the backburner,” he said.
Additionally, there is no evidence Democrats are willing to aggressively cut the biggest parts of the budget, such as entitlement programs and defense. Former President Bill Clinton told Senate Democrats at their policy lunch this week that one of the biggest reasons to finish health care is to allow Obama to focus on economic concerns next year – in part with more spending. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said afterward that Clinton had advised getting health care out of the way to “clear the tables and allow the focus to be on jobs and education and infrastructure.” None of that is free.
The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday the White House is considering applying some money from the $700 billion financial bailout bill to deficit reduction, and that Cabinet agencies have been asked to submit two budget plans for next year, one that freezes spending at existing levels and one that trims spending by 5 percent. Congress has long history of taking those requests and piling on money for programs it favors. The only way Obama can prevent Congress from imposing its will – a tactic he has been reluctant to do during his presidency – would be to threaten vetoes. And if Obama’s political goal is to minimize tough votes, gutting domestic spending bills could mean fewer projects lawmakers can brag about back home. History shows that that’s often an impossible sale on the Hill.
POTUS to catch end of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group dinner.
Arena contributors discuss the decision to try 9/11 suspects in N.Y.
D.C. chefs weigh in on what the Obamas should do for their next big date.
Palin's book hasn't hit shelves yet, but it's already a phenomenon.
Texas senator delays resignation, pursues governor nomination.
Obama promises nations of Asia 'a new era of engagement.'
War on Deficits!?!
Ha!
Obama hasn't the first clue about how to be a leader. He seems to be trying to put The Onion out of business instead.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
T W O * C H I C K E N S * I N * E V E R Y * P O T ************************************************************
Is 2010 an election year with all this jobs talk ?
War on deficits and the Campaigner in Chief ?
Jobs programs now to be focused on ?
Will we forget about : CAP & TAX and ObamaCARE ?
Do we care about our freedoms being lost to socialism ? **********************************************************************
It is an election year . . . . H O O R A Y * T W E N T Y * T E N * 2 0 1 0
Well you two lets see what he has to say and his plans for Jobs and the Budget.
HAHAHAHAH I had heard his plan today to take TARP money and pay down the deficit. OK so let me get this straight, he is going to borrow from Peter to Pay Paul. Brilliant. This is why he went to Harvard and I went to State. I just don't understand either economics or math, all those negative numbers, oh wait to the Whitehouse that is negative growth not losses.
http://bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1211459
http://bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1211459
http://bostonherald.com/bus...
Gee they own it now.. No more blaming the party of NO..
It's always easier to run and election than it is to run a Country.
But again you democrats have the honer of having the highest Monthly deficet.
Here is another Boston article.. for all you viewers and posters who think anything is going to change...
http://bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20091113honest_mistakes_martha_coakley_failed_to_disclose_all_assets/
http://bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20091113honest_mistakes_martha_coakley_failed_to_disclose_all_assets/
http://bostonherald.com/new...
Gee Iand I thought it was those nasty republicans who cheated on thier taxes.. Boy I bet this is no suprise , That a Democrats forgot to file the proper paper work while running for Senate..
And please before the left defends her.. ummm She is the State Attorney General... she actually is over seeing this type of crime.
Obama is the last person to address deficits. His administration is killing this economy.
On the political side, Obama can help moderate Democrats avoid some tough votes in an election year and, perhaps more importantly, calm the nerves of independent voters who are voicing big concerns with the big spending and deficits.
Read Full Article »