Sign in
Become a MarketWatch member today
David Weidner's Writing on the Wall
Jan. 5, 2010, 12:01 a.m. EST · Recommend (12) · Post:
View all David Weidner's Writing on the Wall "º
"¹ Previous Column
The bank that couldn't shoot straight
First Take "º
Buffett slams the brakes on Kraft
By David Weidner, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Regular readers of this column know that it rarely, if ever, dispenses investment advice. That's a big reason why it's still around after all these years.
There is, however, a difference between investment advice and investing principles.
After hanging around Wall Street for so long, I've learned a few investing principles that stand the test of time. They're just as true in bear markets as they are in bull markets.
Some are maxims you hear every quarter from your broker. Some aren't talked about very much. Maybe it's because Wall Street wants us to believe the markets are something they're not.
This brings us to our first investing principle:
The markets are little more than legitimized casinos. They aren't safe. If investors really wanted safety, they would invest in FDIC-insured savings accounts, certificates of deposit or municipal bonds.
Sure, many of those "safe" investments carry risk, but they are the modern-day equivalent of mattress-stuffing compared to investing in stocks, bonds, commodities, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and all of their derivatives.
Some people will tell you that you can hedge these bets. You can invest in options or futures or take short positions. But insuring trades has never made sense to me. If you have to spend money to hedge a bet, it probably means you can't afford to invest the money.
Most of us who invest in the stock market are well aware of the risk. We take that risk because we want to beat inflation or the anemic returns of some of the aforementioned safer investments. Wall Street makes investing sound complicated, but it really comes down to our second principle:
When the Dow Jones Industrial Average /quotes/comstock/10w!i:dji/delayed (INDU 10,535, -48.67, -0.46%) soared above 14,000 and the S&P 500 Index /quotes/comstock/21z!i1:in\x (SPX 1,132, -0.58, -0.05%) climbed to 1,500, they did so because investors got greedy.
Through the middle of the last decade, real gross-domestic-product growth was around 3%. Yet, in just a span of seven years, the Dow rose 40%. It was speculative greed. Investors didn't want to miss the easy money. It was 1928 all over again.
Reuters Warren Buffett
So, what happened to cause the collapse? A massive decline in industrial output? Of course not.
When the first few subprime loans began to go sour, everyone rushed to the exits. It wasn't just fear -- it was panic. The market sold off 50%.
- breath999 | 1:26 a.m. Today1:26 a.m. Jan. 5, 2010
Kraft CEO Irene Rosenfeld gets an earful, being told that her costly pursuit of Cadbury amounts to biting off more than her company can chew -- by none other than Warren Buffett.
57 min ago1:46 p.m. Jan. 5, 2010
Behavioral Economics
12 Dr. Dooms shred 2010 investing optimism
Tech Tales
Unisys, NCR: Tale of two old-school stocks
On the Markets
First trading day of year may mean little
ROI
Money for nothing
The Economist's Corner
End of 2009's ultra-low rates is coming
Writing on the Wall
Four investing principles for 2010 and beyond
China still offers opportunities
Marsh on Monday
Read Full Article »