A shocking report from Brookings exposes just how massive America's poverty problem is. While substantial reductions in poverty were made during the 1990's, America's poor have been rocked by the dual economic downturns since 2000.
The result is that poverty grew at twice the rate of U.S. population growth from 2000 - 2008, and now encompasses 39.1 million Americans.
If one were to expand the definition of poverty to merely 'poor' (yet still very poor), then a eye-popping 30% of the nation lives no higher than twice the poverty base line.
Brookings: In 2008, 91.6 million people—more than 30 percent of the nation’s population—fell below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. More individuals lived in families with incomes between 100 and 200 percent of poverty line (52.5 million) than below the poverty line (39.1 million) in 2008. Between 2000 and 2008, large suburbs saw the fastest growing low-income populations across community types and the greatest uptick in the share of the population living under 200 percent of poverty.
Here's where it gets even more ridiculous -- If you break down the data to individual areas, then there's at least ten U.S. cities with poverty rates of around 30%. Moreover, Brookings latest research highlights how poverty has been getting worse especially fast in the suburbs, thus the U.S. is faced with the challenges of suburban poverty like never before:
California and Florida have been hit especially hard:
Finally, this bad news has likely become far worse already. This research doesn't include 2009 since full data hasn't come out yet. When it does, expect a huge up-tick in poverty rates given since that's when the real brunt of the recent crisis hit 'Main St.'.
Unfortunately, our regression analyses suggest that these metro areas are not likely to see such decreases in 2009, a year in which no metro area proved exempt from increased unemployment rates. Although the Census will not officially release poverty rates for 2009 until fall of next year, job losses alone foretell a substantially larger increase in the metropolitan poverty rate than the 0.3 percent reported from 2007 to 2008, when unemployment increases were just beginning to accelerate.
Read the full report here > What's This? xTo embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.
600px wide (preview) <iframe src="http://www.businessinsider.com/embed?id=4b5e42b10000000000d2468d&width=600&height=430" width="600" height="430" border="0" frameborder="0"></iframe> 400px wide (preview) <iframe src="http://www.businessinsider.com/embed?id=4b5e42b10000000000d2468d&width=400&height=430" width="400" height="430" border="0" frameborder="0"></iframe> 300px wide (preview) <iframe src="http://www.businessinsider.com/embed?id=4b5e42b10000000000d2468d&width=300&height=430" width="300" height="430" border="0" frameborder="0"></iframe> // setup button event listeners // embed post loadButton('embed-button','embed-info'); loadButton('embed-close','embed-info'); loadButton('button-preview1','embed-preview1', ""); loadButton('button-preview2','embed-preview2', ""); loadButton('button-preview3','embed-preview3', ""); Share: Buzz Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit StumbleUpon LinkedIn Short URL Sponsored Link: See Also: 1-in-3 Old Brits Live In Freezing 'Fuel Poverty' Hoping For Global Warming Gartman: Blame Democratic Mayors For Nationwide Poverty You're Making Less Than You Used To And 40 Million Americans Are Now Poor $(".related a").mousedown(function() { $.post("/ws/heatmap", { homepage: '4b5e42b10000000000d2468d', uri: $(this).attr("href") }); }); Vincent Fernando a writer for The Business Insider. Contact: e-mail: var dw = function(s) { document.write(s); };dw('v');dw('fern');dw('ando');dw('@bus');dw('ines');dw('sins');dw('ider');dw('.com');dw('');use contact page AIM: marked2market Subscribe to his twitter feed Recent Posts Asian Stocks Rocked By Sudde... Japan's Shrinking Population... Tony Blair Commits Political... 70 Comments kp on Jan 25, 8:38 PM said: 1 1 The definition of poverty is? Income , Net worth ? Bankruptcies? thanks Reply Vincent Fernando on Jan 25, 8:44 PM said: 0 8 @kp: It's based on the government's poverty threshold calculations done each year. It also depends on the number of people living in a household and where they live. (living costs vary by location) For 2009, this threshold was an income of $10,830 for a person living by themselves, nationwide. Some believe, as Brookings does, that the threshold is set too low: ... Developed in the 1960s, the federal poverty thresholds provide a longstanding benchmark with which to measure changes in the economic wellbeing of families and individuals across the country. However, researchers have argued that this outdated measure does not adequately capture eco- nomic hardship, in part because it does not reach far enough up the income scale given the costs of basic necessities in today's economy.10 Some research has found that setting the definition of "low- income" at twice the federal poverty line is a much more accurate reflection of the income families need to afford essentials, including food, housing, transportation, and health care.11 Other research has used 150 percent of the poverty level, which falls more in line with international measures of the low-income population based on 50 percent of median income.12 In this study, we use the traditional poverty measure"”or 100 percent of the federal thresholds"”as the primary measure of poverty. However, in view of the varied approaches in the literature, we also explore trends using the alternative measures of 150 and 200 percent of the poverty line. Reply kp on Jan 25, 8:58 PM said: 0 3 @Vincent Fernando: thanks Reply jonas on Jan 26, 12:40 AM said: 4 1 @kp: The definition of poverty is any American city where Democrats have been in charge long enough to destroy the place - Detroit, Cleveland, Oakland, Newark, Baltimore, Hartford, Bronx, Compton etc etc Reply zzzzzzzzzz on Jan 25, 8:44 PM said: 4 Read Full Article »