The Real Situation Behind the Fake Recovery

Credit Writedowns February 4, 2010

Home » Archives » Financial Institutions » The Fake Recovery

Digg it

Bookmark it

Stumble it

I last posted on Thursday before the Easter Holidays in two posts very much at odds with one another. The overall thrust of the first post was that the financial services industry in the United States was due to gain from some very advantageous circumstances in 2009. Meanwhile, the later re-post pointed out the continued fragility of the U.S. economy and banking system and focused on liquidity and solvency as unresolved issues. I would like to bring these two posts together here because I believe the concept behind the dichotomy is best described as the Fake Recovery.

Why ‘Fake’? This is a fake recovery because the underlying systemic issues in the financial sector are being papered over through various mechanisms designed to surreptitiously recapitalize banks while monetary and fiscal stimulus induces a rebound before many banks’ inherent insolvency becomes a problem. This means the banking system will remain weak even after recovery takes hold. The likely result of the weak system will be a relapse into a depression-like circumstances once the temporary salve of stimulus has worn off. Note that this does not preclude stocks from large rallies or a new bull market from forming because as unsustainable as the recovery may be, it will be a recovery nonetheless.

The real situation In truth, the U.S. banking system as a whole is probably insolvent. By that I mean the likely future losses of loans and assets already on balance sheets at U.S. financial institutions, if incurred today, would reveal the system as a whole to lack the necessary regulatory capital to continue functioning under current guidelines. In fact, some prognosticators believe these losses far exceed the entire capital of the U.S. financial system. Witness a recentpost by Nouriel Roubini:

The RGE Monitor new estimate in January 2009 of peak credit losses (available in a paper for our RGE clients) suggested that total losses on loans made by U.S. financial firms and the fall in the market value of the assets they are holding would be at their peak about $3.6 trillion ($1.6 trillion for loans and $2 trillion for securities). The U.S. banks and broker dealers are exposed to half of this figure, or $1.8 trillion; the rest is borne by other financial institutions in the US and abroad. The capital backing the banks' assets was last fall only $1.4 trillion, leaving the U.S. banking system some $400 billion in the hole, or close to zero even after the government and private sector recapitalization of such banks and after banks' provisioning for losses. Thus, another $1.4 trillion would be needed to bring back the capital of banks to the level they had before the crisis; and such massive additional recapitalization is needed to resolve the credit crunch and restore lending to the private sector.

Now, obviously, if we were to face up to this situation, there would be no chance of recovery as the capital required to recapitalize the banking system would mean a long and deep downturn well into 2010 and perhaps beyond. This is not politically acceptable as 2010 is an election year. Nor is the nationalization of large financial institutions acceptable to the Obama Administration. Moreover, bailing out banks to the tune of trillions of dollars while the economy is in depression is equally unacceptable to the American electorate. The Obama Administration is keenly aware of this fact.

These constraints, some artificial and others very real, leave the Administration with limited options.

Engineer recovery With the preceding constraints in mind, we should remember that the first priority of elected officials in Washington is not necessarily to make the best long-term choices for the American people, but rather to get re-elected in order to have the opportunity to make those choices. It should be patently obvious that a downturn which began in December 2007 would be fatal to many politicians if allowed to continue well into 2010. This is why recovery of some sort must take place before that time – irrespective of whether it is sustainable.

How to engineer recovery is another question altogether. Here again there are a set of political constraints which make things more challenging. First, there are large swathes of the population that are uncomfortable with the huge debt load and deficit spending that a stimulus-induced recovery creates. Moreover, a government-sponsored nationalisation or recapitalisation plan would only increase this deficit spending and these debts.

As a result, the Obama Administration has crafted a plan to circumvent these obstacles.

The stimulus to come from these measures is still in the pipeline and, by the end of this year, will probably add a big kick to the economy. You should note that only the fiscal stimulus required legislative approval. All of the other ’stimulus’ has been done without Congressional approval and largely without Congressional oversight. These activities have been specifically designed to be opaque. The government’s claims of wanting to increase transparency ring hollow (see my post on Bloomberg’s suit against the Fed as an example of what is really happening).

I should also mention that the Federal Reserve has been a large factor here. It is acting in concert with the executive branch in a non-arms length fashion which I believe will have consequences regarding Fed independence down the line.

Other positive economic factors

There are a number of so-called green shoots (a phrase coined by Norman Lamont) of note.

I linked to the first two bullets of these other factors. And I wanted to spend a little time on factor number three because I think it is important. Niels Jensen of Absolute Capital Partners has a very solid write-up on this in his most recent newsletter: (do sign up for his free newsletter because it is quite informative. Click here to see the newsletters and sign up.)

Turning my attention to the global economy, after a rather muted beginning, manufacturers around the world have now begun to react aggressively to the economic downturn and inventories are falling aggressively. Chart 5 below depicts US manufacturing inventories as published recently by the Census Bureau. Inventory changes can have a meaningful impact on GDP. There is one example from the 1981-82 recession where the inventory correction subtracted 5% (annualised) from GDP in just one quarter. The current inventory correction is very negative for GDP in Q1 and possibly also in Q2, but it is very difficult to quantify the effect it is going to have. We will have to wait and see.

However, as we must remind ourselves, the stock market is not trading on what is going to happen in Q1 and Q2 of this year. Projecting at least 6-9 months ahead, the stock market is probably already looking ahead to Q4 and possibly even Q1 of next year. And the inventory adjustment currently underway is very bullish for GDP growth later this year and into next. The reason is simple. Manufacturers always overreact. Come Q3 or Q4, they will suddenly sit up and realise that inventories have fallen too much and that they need to produce more. There is no reason to believe that this recession will be any different.

Obviously, this means that U.S. Q1 and perhaps even Q2 GDP will be very low due to the subtraction of inventories now being purged. However, when we get to Q3 and Q4, this effect will be gone and quarterly and yearly comparisons will look favourable. So the inventory purge may mean a huge upside surprise to GDP in the second half of the year and early 2010 – potentially enough to see positive GDP numbers.

A brief reminder of what lurks beneath Despite the positives from the previous section, there are significant headwinds which may even preclude a positive GDP number. They include:

Moreover, credit availability –and hence GDP will be constrained by numerous factors including the following:

All of this means that a cyclical rebound is not a foregone conclusion at all.

Tying the threads together You should be under no illusion that the coming rebound is permanent. Much of it is not. What we are seeing is the makings of a cyclical recovery that might begin as early as Q4 2009 or Q1 2010. How long or robust that recovery is remains to be seen. Moreover, it is still questionable whether we will get any meaningful recovery at all in spite of the ‘green shoots’ because the banking system in the United States is severely undercapitalised and more asset writedowns are coming due. This is a fake recovery underneath which many problems remain.

Nevertheless, banks are going to earn a lot of money and that is bullish for their shares – at least in the medium-term. Yes, the stock market is overbought right now. However, if banks put together some decent earnings reports over the next few quarters, their shares will rise.

Furthermore, if the banks can earn enough, this cyclical recovery will have legs as banks will then have enough capital to resume lending and that is supportive of the broader market as well. It is still too early to tell how this will play out over the longer-term. For now, I am much more positive on financials, and somewhat positive on the broader market as well.

Related postsLooking beyond the fake recoveryWhat Home-Loan Banks reveal about the effects of mark-to-marketDiscerning a real from a fake, technical, statistical, or partial recoveryStephen Roach sees a W-shaped recovery for ChinaMark to market is beside the point

Amazon.com WidgetsPollsSorry, there are no polls available at the moment.Polls ArchiveMost ViewedCredit Crisis TimelineSwitzerland threatened with bankruptcyLetterman’s Top 10 George Bush momentsIs the State of California bankrupt?The Dummy’s Guide to the US Banking CrisisMarc Faber: I advise every American to hold his gold outside of the United StatesTop ten predictions for the 2009 global economyByron Wien: Ten Surprises for 2009Chart of the day: Dow 1928-1932The recession is over but the depression has just begunThe Swedish banking crisis response – a model for the future?Quantitative easing: printing money like mad to ward off deflationAboutThe top 25 European banks by assetsLehman Brothers: a primer on Credit Default SwapsMarc Faber: China’s numbers are fakeChart of the day: Total US DebtCalifornia will go bankruptCurrency crisis is gathering stormThe TED Spread Tweet Blender if (typeof(TB_config.widgets) == 'undefined') { TB_config.widgets = new Array(); } TB_config.widgets['tweetblender-3'] = { 'sources': '@edwardnh', 'refreshRate': 0, 'tweetsNum': 5 } TB_allSources = TB_allSources.concat(["@edwardnh"]); edwardnh: @cenedella on $YHOO to $MMW sale, I bet you there will be no FTC 2nd request on this one. 13 hours agoedwardnh: Eliot Spitzer on Stephen Colbert: Credit Writedowns http://bit.ly/d77CzY 14 hours agoedwardnh: Harold Ford Jr. | ColbertNation.com: http://bit.ly/axT9kM This guy looks like a major flip-flopper. Can you vote for him? 14 hours agoedwardnh: RT @cenedella: $MWW acquires HotJobs.com from $YHOO for $225 mm in cash: http://bit.ly/9ezzmC -8% return on investment over 8 yrs. 14 hours agoview more » TB_addLoadEvent(TB_start); jQuery(document).ready(TB_start); TranslateTranslate to:ArabicBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishFilipinoFinnishFrenchGermanGreekHebrewHindiIndonesianItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianNorwegianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwedishUkrainianVietnamese/*= mystrlen) { document.write( ' ' ); document.write( 'return to original' ); }else{ document.write( '' ); }/*]]>*/Powered by Google Translate.Tip Jar

Donation Amount: (Currency: USD)

Repeat Donation: Do not repeatDailyWeeklyMonthlyYearly x

Research

Casey Research: What's a Company's Gold Worth?

Casey Research: How to Talk to a Nincompoop

Casey Research: The Other Oil Play You Simply Can't Ignore

INO: Crude Oil...what does the chart say?

INO: Stock Trading in 90 Seconds

INO: Forex Trading in 90 Seconds

Recent PostsEliot Spitzer on Stephen ColbertAmerica's Incredible Consumer Confidence IndexSpain’s Incredible Consumer Confidence IndexIncreasing layoffs could spell trouble for economyLinks: 2010-02-03Jim Chanos still bearish on China, talks malinvestmentGlobal manufacturing continued its expansion In JanuaryISM manufacturing survey points to more inventory gainsOn depreciation, malinvestment and GDP as a gross numberChart of the Day: Personal Income and Outlays sr_adspace_id = 3985507; sr_adspace_width = 160; sr_adspace_height = 600; sr_ad_new_window = true; sr_adspace_type = "graphic"; Popular PostsAfter Greece and Portugal, does Spain come next?GDP up 5.7%, fastest rate since 2003Links: 2010-01-29Chart of the day: Clusterstock - How the AIG bailout workedBreaking: Darrell Issa asks for a subpoena in AIG bailout cover-upRe-interpreting recession dating committee’s double-dip language for debt deflation dynamicsConstruction in China’s Ghost TownsThe week in review at Credit Writedowns: 2010-01-30Barack Hoover ObamaChris Matthews on Obama's SOTU : “I forgot he was black”Comments

automobiles bailout banking bankruptcy bankruptcy and foreclosure Barack Obama bear market investing behavioral economics blog bond investing bonds Britain budget business media capital capital markets Caroline Baum cds China consumer credit credit and credit cards credit cards credit crisis crisis solutions data debt deflation Democrats depression derivatives derivatives trading distraction economic economic depression economic indicators economic recovery economic stimulus election employment Europe FDIC federal reserve finance charts financial bubbles financial history financial leverage financial media financial news financial statements foreclosure foreign exchange trading forex Germany global economy government government bonds homes house prices inflation interest rates international investing investment Japan jobs law and justice legal lending loans manufacturing market wizards mergers money mortgages news oil outlook Paul Volcker political media property psychology RBS real estate recession recovery regulation regulatory capitalism saving social issues Spain stimulus stock market stocks unemployment United Kingdom United States vehicles video Willem Buiter

The Real Situation Behind the Fake Recovery

Related Articles