There will be no Weekly Commentary for the week of XXXXXX. Scott’s most recent commentary is available below.
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 20,000 last month, not a big miss relative to expectations and not as bad as some had feared. Annual benchmark revisions to the establishment survey data received more attention than usual. That was due largely to the fact that the payroll revision was much larger (-1.0%) than is typical (± 0.2%). The Bureau of Labor Statistics already told us that job losses in the recession were more severe than the previous data had indicated. However, the downward revision to payrolls was more severe than the BLS had estimated back in October. Still, there was encouraging news in the report.
Payrolls averaged a 35,000 monthly decline over the last three months – still negative, but nowhere close to what we were seeing a year ago (payrolls fell by an average of 753,000 per month in 1Q09, and by 620,000 in 4Q08).
Click here to enlarge
Once a year, the BLS re-anchors payroll estimates to figures derived from the administrative records of the unemployment insurance tax system. The revised figures show that private-sector payrolls have fallen by 8.5 million since the recession began. However, revised data also show the downtrend flattening considerably in the last few months. That’s consistent with other evidence indicating a slower pace of job losses.
The unemployment rate fell unexpectedly in January (to 9.7%), and for once that was not due to a drop in labor force participation (in fact, the size of the labor force increased). The broad U-6 measure, which includes discouraged workers and those working part time but preferring full-time employment, dropped to 16.5%, vs. 17.3% in December. One month does not a trend make, and seasonal adjustment can add a lot of noise in January, but it’s moving in the right direction.
Click here to enlarge
The labor market is still working through a period of structural change. Many of the jobs lost during the recession will not be coming back. This is reflected in the high level of permanent layoffs (which appears to have begun trending lower) and the elevated ranks of the long-term unemployed (41% of those unemployed have been without work from half a year or more). Construction payrolls continued to fall (-75,000 in January, about the average monthly loss in 2009), with nonresidential accounting for most of the decline since early 2009.
What was encouraging in the report? Average weekly hours rose to 33.9 overall (vs. 33.8 in December), with gains in most industries (manufacturing at 39.9, vs. 39.6). Payroll growth was reported in manufacturing (+11,000, the first increase in three years), retail (+42,100), and temp-help services (+52,000). The increase in hours and the rise in temp-help jobs are traditional precursors to new hiring. Also, productivity growth has been very strong, which hints at some new hiring ahead.
President Obama summed things up nicely in suggesting that the report is “not cause for celebration, but does provide hope.” Government efforts to stimulate jobs and spur the flow of credit to small firms should help reinforce the economic recovery, but it will still be a long haul for a full labor market recovery.
The advance figure for fourth quarter growth surprised to the upside, although the story was largely as anticipated. The GDP data will be revised at the end of February and again in late March (and in perpetuity, in annual benchmark revisions). Don’t get too wedded to the numbers. However, the story is unlikely to change much in revision. The fourth quarter data tell us little about what to expect for the current quarter and beyond. Still, the monthly figures suggest an unevenness and lackluster momentum heading into the new year. That doesn’t mean that the recovery is in doubt. Rather, improvement is likely to be gradual in the face of so many headwinds, building over the course of the year. That’s good news relative to where the economy was a year ago, but it’s bad news for those hoping for greater and more immediate improvement in the labor market.
Real GDP rose at a 5.7% annual rate in the advance estimate for 4Q09. More than half of that was due to a slower rate of inventory reduction. Consumer spending growth was moderate. Business fixed investment was mixed, but mostly positive.
Click here to enlarge
The one major surprise in the data was net exports. Exports continued to improve, as anticipated. That’s good news for the U.S. economy. However, imports rose more slowly than anticipated. The result was that net exports added 0.5 percentage point to the headline GDP figure rather than subtracting a moderate amount. The Bureau of Labor Statistics had to make assumptions about December trade, so these figures are almost sure to be revised. The trade deficit still widened significantly in nominal (current-dollar) terms, but it’s the real (inflation-adjusted) figure that matters for GDP growth.
The government also had to make assumptions about December inventories. However, revisions should not change the story much at all. Inventories fell sharply in 2Q09, subtracting significantly from overall GDP growth, and the pace of inventory decline was somewhat slower in 3Q09. The monthly figures have suggested that the inventory completion is nearing an end. Inventories fell much more slowly in 4Q09. The level of inventories is now more in line with the pace of final sales – and should begin rising more or less with the pace of final sales over the next few quarters (adding moderately to overall GDP growth). The end of the inventory correction is good news, but it’s not enough to fuel stronger GDP growth going forward. That will depend on improvement in underlying demand. A strengthening in job growth will be critical to that.
Last week, President Obama proposed a new stimulus package. Congress, reflecting the will of the American public is dead set against further stimulus. However, this is an election year and it will be very difficult to vote against a “jobs” bill. The jobs bill will create new incentives for firms to hire new workers and the bill is expected to include some efforts to improve the flow of credit to small businesses, which typically account for a third of net job creation during economic expansions. The sticking point will be how to pay for it.
The package will add to the budget deficit, but that should not be a worry in the near term. The bigger concern is the long-term budget outlook. There will be plenty of time to put the country on a course toward a more balanced budget (which will entail some very tough choices in terms of taxes and spending) once the recovery becomes well entrenched.
In the near term, the economy will continue to face a number of headwinds: a continued hangover in the housing sector (with a possible fading in government support), troubles in commercial real estate, great strains on state and local government budgets, and legislative uncertainty (which may be restraining business investment). The recovery will remain susceptible to a major shock, such as a natural disaster or a sharp rise in oil prices. However, despite the current headwinds, the outlook for a gradual economic recovery, building over time, remains in place.
Federal Reserve policymakers meet this week to set monetary policy. While nobody expects the Fed to raise short-term interest rates anytime soon, the Fed will have a variety of new tools available to tighten policy in this cycle. In the months ahead, we’re likely to hear more details about which tools the Fed will use and in what order (sequentially or in combination). The Fed has time to gauge the expected strength of the recovery, but will also have to incorporate uncertainties.
Recessions are not merely the economy slowing down and then speeding back up. There is substantial structural change going on. Most jobs that are lost are unlikely to return. Consumer spending habits and inventory management are also changing. Figures on retail sales suggest a shift to a lower consumption path, which corresponds to an increase in the personal savings rate. Surveys indicate that households have cut back on discretionary spending, increasing savings or paying down debt. The adjustment to the new spending path is transitory. The new path appears slower than before, but that’s partly a consequence of a weak labor market.
Click here to enlarge
Inventories tend to grow in line with sales over time. Improvements in inventory management and a push toward holding inventories overseas has dampened the inventory cycle in the U.S. Inventories have been a smaller factor in recent recessions. However, in the recent recession, the inventory cycle has been much more apparent. As sales slow, inventories rise, then fall to be more inline with the pace of sales. This inventory cycle appears to have come full circle. Inventory to sales ratios are nearing their pre-crisis levels.
On Friday, the government will report its initial estimate of fourth quarter growth. The advance estimate will be based on assumptions regarding December foreign trade, inventories, and other components. A slower rate of inventory reduction will make a large contribution to 4Q09 GDP growth. Remember, it’s the change in inventories that contributes to the level of GDP. The change in the change in inventories contributes to GDP growth. Inventories don’t have to rise to add to GDP growth, they simply have to fall at a slower rate. There’s some chance that we could see a small inventory build in the inflation-adjusted numbers, in which case the GDP estimate will be even higher (some estimates on the Street are more than 5%). However, excluding inventories, fourth quarter GDP growth is likely to be relatively lackluster. So don’t get too excited about the headline figure. Domestic Final Sales (GDP less inventories and net exports) are a better measure of underlying demand.
The fourth quarter GDP figures tell us little about growth in the current quarter and beyond. The recovery should continue to build over time, but there are still a number of significant headwinds in the near term. Fed officials realize this, which will keep them from raising short-term interest rates anytime soon.
There are a number of uncertainties in the outlook, which makes it difficult to set monetary policy. Inflation should not be a problem. There’s no pressure coming through the labor market, the widest channel for inflation. High government budget deficits do not cause inflation (see: the Reagan years).
Importantly, the Fed will have a number of new tools at its disposal as it tightens. Officials have already begun to unwind the special liquidity and lending facilities. The Fed now pays interest on bank deposits held at the Fed and can discourage bank lending by raising that rate (but why would they do that in the foreseeable future?). If inflation were to become a more immediate concern, the Fed could sell its holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, but that would likely be disruptive to the financial markets. It would be easier to do reverse repos (something that the Fed has already tested). An increase in the Fed funds rate is likely to come later. The Fed’s decision to tighten will be driven by job growth, and the trend in core inflation (which has remained low).
The opinions offered by Dr. Brown should be considered a part of your overall decision-making process. For more information about this report – to discuss how this outlook may affect your personal situation and/or to learn how this insight may be incorporated into your investment strategy – please contact your financial advisor or use the convenient Office Locator to find our office(s) nearest you today.
All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Research Department of Raymond James & Associates (RJA) at this date and are subject to change. Information has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing report is accurate or complete. Other departments of RJA may have information which is not available to the Research Department about companies mentioned in this report. RJA or its affiliates may execute transactions in the securities mentioned in this report which may not be consistent with the report's conclusions. RJA may perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking business from, any company mentioned in this report. For institutional clients of the European Economic Area (EEA): This document (and any attachments or exhibits hereto) is intended only for EEA Institutional Clients or others to whom it may lawfully be submitted. There is no assurance that any of the trends mentioned will continue in the future. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Read Full Article »