Tax Fairness Reaches a Tipping Point

Go to PDF Version | Go to Recent Issues

To save time in the future, you may select one of the preferences below. You may update your eIBD preferences at any time by going into My IBD and selecting Update Your eIBD Preferences.

Set Web-Based Version as Default Set PDF Version as Default Set Recent Issues as Default

Get QuoteSearch Site

Daily Graphs Online

 View Enlarged Image

Fiscal Policy: The latest data show a record number of people with no tax obligation. We also have the highest-earning nontaxpayers ever. With more riding the wagon and fewer pulling, it should soon break down.

A record number of the 142 million tax returns filed in 2008 resulted in no taxes owed, according to the Tax Foundation's analysis of the latest IRS data. About 51.6 million returns, or 36.3%, were filed by those whose deductions, exemptions and tax credits wiped out any federal income-tax obligation.

These aren't people who have overpaid their taxes or had so much withheld from their paychecks that they'll get refunds. Those people owe taxes and merely provided the government with a zero interest loan until accounts are settled. These are people who pay no taxes at all.

There's been a 59% increase in the number of nonpayers since 2000, growing from 32.6 million in 2000 to 51.6 million in 2008. In the same period, the total tax filers grew by only 10%.

Not only are fewer people paying any taxes, but also the income levels for these nonpayers have steadily risen. A family of four earning more than $50,000 can have no income tax liability after taking the standard deduction and the child tax credit.

According to the Tax Foundation, "The major elements of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 boosted the maximum income for nonpayers to more than $56,700" — the highest ever.

The government has continually expanded the value of benefits such as the earned income tax credit to the point where you get a check from Uncle Sam even if you paid no taxes during the year. That's what made it so laughable when the administration claimed it was cutting taxes for most Americans when nearly 40% pay no taxes to start with. These are in essence welfare checks.

The tax code was originally intended to raise sufficient revenues to pay for the essential functions of government. It has morphed into a tool for social engineering, to incentivize or even punish certain behavior, and even to redistribute wealth. That's why we call it a "progressive" tax code.

We have applauded each time taxes have been cut, most recently under President George W. Bush.

We urge that these tax cuts not be allowed to expire this year as they are scheduled to do. That would be a huge tax increase at a time we can least afford it. But each cut has been obtained through deals removing more and more Americans from the tax rolls.

Media: In changing times the old guard can either adapt or they can react bitterly. As the old world of elite journalists crumbles, the latter kind of outburst is predictable. But some outbursts are astonishingly clueless. Take Howell Raines. No journalist was more elite — or more ...

There are any number of good reasons for House Democrats to vote against health care reform. Abortion isn't one of them. At least, it shouldn't be. There is scant difference between the House bill that anti-abortion advocates deem acceptable and the Senate version they claim would allow federal ...

'What's driving passions right now," President Obama said last fall on CBS' "Face the Nation," "is that health care has become a proxy for a broader set of issues about how much government should be involved in the economy." The president was indeed accurate in his description of the debate. It is ...

The final outcome of the health care reform debate is uncertain — who can predict where a writhing eel will land? — but we have learned a few things already. First, we know that President Obama and the Democratic congressional leadership could not persuade a majority of Americans of the ...

Surprise, surprise. Sen. Chris Dodd's financial regulation proposal raises the possibility of substantial progress on the road to ending "too big to fail" (TBTF) and bailout nation for banks and other financial institutions. How the Dodd bill will play out in the final details remains to be seen. ...

Posted By: IAmNemo(5) on 3/17/2010 | 12:30 AM ET

No taxation without representation? Consider no representation without taxation.

Posted By: Star20(5) on 3/16/2010 | 11:16 PM ET

321blastoff, I agree with you, in spirit. Unfortunately, I don't think your way will get us anywhere. If we continue as usual, the freeloaders will take more and you and I will have to carry more. I'm all for a more defensive action of looking for every tax break and every handout. That sounds counterintuitive, but it is the only way to put a stop to this madness, sooner, rather than later, when it will be much worse.

Posted By: 321blastoff(60) on 3/16/2010 | 10:15 PM ET

If citizens and workers do not pay taxes why does the government represent those people? Add the question to the census- do you pay even one dime in taxes? If not then they don't count. Be an American- pay taxes like the rest of us.

To participate in Community areas, please Sign In or Register

Register

Diversifying can cut off risk.  But too much can cut off profit.

Get QuoteSearch Site

Read Full Article »


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments


Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes