GS_googleAddAdSenseService("ca-pub-9637142192954691"); GS_googleEnableAllServices(); GA_googleAddSlot("ca-pub-9637142192954691", "AmericanProspect_sidebar_Top_160x600"); GA_googleFetchAds(); GA_googleFillSlot("AmericanProspect_sidebar_Top_160x600");
SUBSCRIBER LOG IN: Remember Me Forgot your password? Current Issue Download the PDF
The symbol identifies content for paid subscribers only.
GA_googleAddSlot("ca-pub-9637142192954691", "AmericanProspect_Sidebar_Middle_Top"); GA_googleFetchAds(); GA_googleFillSlot("AmericanProspect_Sidebar_Middle_Top");
if (typeof ord=='undefined') {ord=Math.random()*10000000000000000;} document.write('');
GA_googleAddSlot("ca-pub-9637142192954691", "AmericanProspect_Sidebar_middle_160x600"); GA_googleFetchAds(); GA_googleFillSlot("AmericanProspect_Sidebar_middle_160x600"); GA_googleAddSlot("ca-pub-9637142192954691", "AmericanProspect_sidebar_160x240"); GA_googleFetchAds(); GA_googleFillSlot("AmericanProspect_sidebar_160x240");
GA_googleAddSlot("ca-pub-9637142192954691", "Sidebar_Bottom_160x600_Before_Adsense"); GA_googleFetchAds(); GA_googleFillSlot("Sidebar_Bottom_160x600_Before_Adsense");
Dean Baker's commentary on economic reporting « David Brooks' Celebration: The U.S. Is Richer Than Chad! | MainCalifornia Gets a Bad Rap on Pensions in NYT
California has done some really really stupid things (like a tax credit for first time homebuyers), but the NYT did the state and its readers a disservice in going after California's pension fund liabilities. The basic story is that if you assume a 4.14 nominal rate of return on pension fund assets, then the state's pension liabilities look really really bad.
The big question that readers should ask is, so what?
There have been few people who have been more critical of assuming exaggerated market returns than me, but 4.14 percent nominal? Anyone want to take a bet that California's pension funds will do better than this?
Look, the market has plummeted from its prior levels. This is good news for future returns. Lower price to earnings ratios open the door for higher future returns. The logic is simple: you are paying much less for each dollar of profits. For this reason, the assumption of 4.14 percent average nominal returns (that gives us just over 2.0 percent real, assuming a 2.0 percent inflation rate) is ridiculously low.
Suppose we assume that pension liabilities grow at the nominal rate of 5 percent a year. If we sum the liabilities over 40 years, using a 4.14 percent discount rate gives a 70 percent higher cost than using a 7.0 percent discount rate. Stocks have historically provided a real return of 7 percentage points above the inflation rate, so assuming a nominal return of 7.0 percent for the mixed portfolio is hardly unreasonable.
In short, the story of outsized pension liabilities in this article is driven largely by a ridiculous assumptions about pension returns. There is no reason whatsoever that the state of California should use this 4.14 percent discount rate in assessing its pension liabilities. This calculation would lead it to exaggerate its pension liabilities and therefore raise taxes or cut pensions and/or other spending unnecessarily.
--Dean Baker
COMMENTS (1)Look, the market has plummeted from its prior levels. This is good news for future returns. cheap christian louboutin shoes
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)
if ( typeof(mtCaptchaVisible) != "undefined" ) mtCaptchaVisible = true; else if ( typeof(commenter_name) != "undefined" ) { var div = document.getElementById("recaptcha_script"); if (commenter_name) div.style.display = "none"; else div.style.display = "block";}Search Beat the Press for:
About Beat the PressDean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, including Plunder & Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy, The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer and The United States Since 1980. Read more about Dean.
Email | RSS
_qacct="p-da12qeST0GrE6";quantserve(); var _rsCI="us-bpaww"; var _rsCG="0"; var _rsDN="//secure-us.imrworldwide.com/"; var _rsPLfl=0; var _rsSE=1; var _rsSM=1.0; var _rsCL=1;California Gets a Bad Rap on Pensions in NYT
California has done some really really stupid things (like a tax credit for first time homebuyers), but the NYT did the state and its readers a disservice in going after California's pension fund liabilities. The basic story is that if you assume a 4.14 nominal rate of return on pension fund assets, then the state's pension liabilities look really really bad.
The big question that readers should ask is, so what?
There have been few people who have been more critical of assuming exaggerated market returns than me, but 4.14 percent nominal? Anyone want to take a bet that California's pension funds will do better than this?
Look, the market has plummeted from its prior levels. This is good news for future returns. Lower price to earnings ratios open the door for higher future returns. The logic is simple: you are paying much less for each dollar of profits. For this reason, the assumption of 4.14 percent average nominal returns (that gives us just over 2.0 percent real, assuming a 2.0 percent inflation rate) is ridiculously low.
Suppose we assume that pension liabilities grow at the nominal rate of 5 percent a year. If we sum the liabilities over 40 years, using a 4.14 percent discount rate gives a 70 percent higher cost than using a 7.0 percent discount rate. Stocks have historically provided a real return of 7 percentage points above the inflation rate, so assuming a nominal return of 7.0 percent for the mixed portfolio is hardly unreasonable.
In short, the story of outsized pension liabilities in this article is driven largely by a ridiculous assumptions about pension returns. There is no reason whatsoever that the state of California should use this 4.14 percent discount rate in assessing its pension liabilities. This calculation would lead it to exaggerate its pension liabilities and therefore raise taxes or cut pensions and/or other spending unnecessarily.
--Dean Baker
COMMENTS (1)Look, the market has plummeted from its prior levels. This is good news for future returns. cheap christian louboutin shoes
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)
if ( typeof(mtCaptchaVisible) != "undefined" ) mtCaptchaVisible = true; else if ( typeof(commenter_name) != "undefined" ) { var div = document.getElementById("recaptcha_script"); if (commenter_name) div.style.display = "none"; else div.style.display = "block";}Search Beat the Press for:
About Beat the PressDean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, including Plunder & Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy, The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer and The United States Since 1980. Read more about Dean.
Email | RSS
Archives April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 Blog Roll Angry Bear Brad DeLong Brad Setser Calculated Risk Econbrowser Economist's View Economonitor Econospeak Greg Mankiw Macroblog Marginal Revolution New Economist Rational Irrationality Nouriel Roubini Real Time Economics Tim Worstall Links FAIR Economic Policy Institute Center for American Progress Bureau of Economic Analysis Congressional Budget Office Bureau of Labor Statistics Support independent media with a tax-deductible donation. Renew your print subscription or e-subscription. Get an e-subscription for $14.95. Give the gift of political insight. Send The American Prospect to a friend. Change your email address or street address. YES! I want to receive The American Prospect — the essential source for progressive ideas. Explore The American Prospect's award-winning investigative journalism and provocative essays in a free trial issue. Continue receiving The American Prospect at only $19.95 for a one-year subscription - a savings of 60% off the newsstand price! First Name Last Name Address 1 Address 2 City State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY ZIP Email Should you decide not to continue receiving the magazine after the initial free issue, simply write "cancel" on the invoice and you will not be billed. Advertise | Donate | Subscribe | Archive | About The American Prospect | Privacy Policy© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Permissions and Reprints
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3812902-1"); pageTracker._initData(); pageTracker._trackPageview(); _qacct="p-f5EylkOYLD59Y";quantserve(); _qacct="p-da12qeST0GrE6";quantserve(); var _rsCI="us-bpaww"; var _rsCG="0"; var _rsDN="//secure-us.imrworldwide.com/"; var _rsPLfl=0; var _rsSE=1; var _rsSM=1.0; var _rsCL=1;Look, the market has plummeted from its prior levels. This is good news for future returns. cheap christian louboutin shoes
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)
Search Beat the Press for:
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He is the author of several books, including Plunder & Blunder: The Rise and Fall of the Bubble Economy, The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer and The United States Since 1980. Read more about Dean.
Email | RSS
© 2010 by The American Prospect, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Permissions and Reprints
Read Full Article »