Battle Royale Between Fundamentals and Technicals

Freshly squeezed market commentary & analysis

During the past few weeks, the bulls and bears have been in a battle royale at the precipice of the February 2010 support level. The S&P 500 index has finally broken above the range with a positive close at today’s high. It also regained the 200 day moving average.

The two camps are mostly divided along ideological lines. If you’re bearish on the stock market, I’d wager that you give more weight to fundamental considerations like:

And if you’re bullish, you probably give more weight to technical analysis, like:

Meet the Bears Nouriel Roubini (RGE), Bob Janjuah (RBS), Dylan Grice and Albert Edwards (Societe Generale), David Rosenberg (Gluskin Sheff), etc. The names are familiar to you already and so are their opinions. These are the bears and for the most part, they build their convictions on fundamental analysis. The two camps are divided and pitted against each other with a few exceptions. Richard Russell who is widely recognized as the most exceptional student of Dow Theory is now bearish citing technical breakdowns and the fear of deflation. Robert Prechter, the recognized authority in Elliott Wave analysis is also bearish, expecting the continuation of the secular bear market to take prices back to March 2009 levels. And finally, Mark Steele (BMO Quant/Technical Research) who told clients to “Go to Cash - In Plain English“.

Among the reasons for issuing a “Get out!” message, Russell pointed to the break down in leadership stocks like Google (GOOG). But if I may be so bold as to quibble with the oracle of the Dow a bit, I would like to point out that the while Google has been showing weak relative strength for some time, other leadership stocks - including Apple (AAPL) which he specifically pointed out - are doing just fine. In fact, the advance decline breadth (see above link) demonstrates that the majority of stocks are in fact much stronger than the superficial numbers on the indexes.

I do not have a monopoly on truth nor do I pretend to know what will happen. I’m simply pointing out that for the most part, the bulls and the bears are split along how they approach the market. And I don’t disagree that if you look at the fundamentals, things look absolutely horrendous right now.

Sentiment But isn’t that reflected in the sentiment and posture of investors and traders? We’ve already look at sentiment during this decline so I won’t go over that again. You can find the weekly overviews here: Week of May 28th, June 4th and July 11th.

As well, while Market Semiotics continues to be bearish long term (who isn’t?) but in the short term a bounce would not be a surprise since their proprietary sentiment indicator (Semiotics Sentiment) has collapsed to just 1% after bumping its head on the ceiling at 100% in late April.

Smart vs. Small Option Traders In contrast to the “smart” option players who trade in S&P 100 index options and are leaning into this decline, the smallest option traders are buying protective puts at a very high rate. Referring to the ROBO option sentiment indicator, Jason Goepfert of SentimenTrader.com wrote recently:

Last week, small traders spent 24% of all of their option volume buying protective puts - at the worst of the worst times during the prior bear markets, that amount only reached 28%, so we’re not too far off from that.

After only a ~14% decline, small option traders are spooked enough to load up on puts to almost the same degree that they did during the darkest days of a harrowing bear market. IF that doesn’t tell you all you need to know, consider that last week the S&P 500 index closed up by about 2.5%. So this shift in retail option sentiment becomes even more contrarian. That tells me that we have washed out a lot of weak hands, making the case for higher stock prices in the short to intermediate term.

Click to see larger chart in a new tab:

Lowry Research Update Pimm Fox sat down with Richard Dickson again last Thursday and for the most part, the Senior Market Strategist at Lowry Research reiterated his view that this is a correction, not a new bull market.

Dickson also mentioned that we would need to see confirmation of the 90%-90% upside day on June 10th. We got that the following day, last Friday and we also got it again with today’s close. This took us above the range and the long term moving average. Another important point that Dickson touches on is the light volume accompanying the rally from the lows. In his views this is not necessarily a negative as it means that supply has been exhausted.

Press play and let it buffer, then jump ahead to the X minute mark to listen to the complete interview:

Survey Says… A few of you may have noticed an unobtrusive pop-up in the corner of your screen asking if you would like to take a reader survey. In case you haven’t, it is because it is shown to very small sample of the total visitors so as to not be annoying. If you do see the survey invitation, I would appreciate it very much if you would fill it out so that I can get to know my readers a bit better.

The responses are anonymous and your privacy is respected. There are about a dozen basic questions which will take you less than 2 minutes to complete as well as a spot for you to give me general feedback or to request specific topics you’d like to see more of in the blog.

Enjoyed this? Don't miss the next one, grab the feed  or                                subscribe through email:  

A lot of my friends have sold their mutual fund holdings. My sister asked me about bearish ETF. So many people were spooked by the flash crash. It is time to go long again!

Have you ever seen this, “lack of supply” happen in the past? If we don’t get a good follow through on real nice volumn then I would be inclined to get bearish again. Another question: How much have the quants, (and perhaps the PPT), do you think contributed to the extreme readings of the TRIN, Vix, etc? I have never seen a market act this much out of character before.

Babak, I’d be happy to fill out the survey but when I tried clicking on it, it disappeared. I don’t know if others are having this problem, though. Would you care to provide a link to the survey?

A battle is a good way to describe, it implies a conflict between 2 equal forces perhaps, net result, the market goes sideways for a considerable period of time, neither bull nor bear?

A few days ago I suggested a counter trend rally was due.

The more influential main trend remains bearish though.

The equity global uptrend since March 2009 was a bear market rally contained within a much larger downtrend that started in 2000.

According to my indicators the March 2009 lows will not hold.

The proprietary indicators I use in my technical analysis can identify trend changes before they occur.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

    Or subscribe through email:

Read Full Article »


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments


Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes