Fiscal Bliss by Hiking Retirement Age to 70

Sign in

Become a MarketWatch member today

Robert Powell

July 2, 2010, 12:01 a.m. EDT · Recommend (3) · Post:

View all Robert Powell "º

New rules on target date funds fall short

Apple giving comedy writers more material

By Robert Powell, MarketWatch

BOSTON (MarketWatch) -- The time has come for the nation to face some facts and, according to Republican Rep. John Boehner, the House minority leader, that means fixing Social Security by hiking the normal retirement age to 70 for future retirees, from the current 67.

Boehner wants to increase the retirement age to 70 for people who have at least 20 years until retirement, plus tie cost-of-living increases to wages rather than the consumer price index, and limit payments so they only go to people who need them, according to published reports. The current Social Security "normal retirement age" for those born in 1960 or later is 67.

"We need to look at the American people and explain to them that we're broke," Boehner was quoted as saying in The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. "If you have substantial non-Social Security income while you're retired, why are we paying you at a time when we're broke? We just need to be honest with people." Read that story at this Web site.

"Boehner is taking a gutsy, and in my view, absolutely correct stance," said Olivia S. Mitchell, a professor at the Wharton School, executive director of the Pension Research Council and director of the Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Research.

"As Americans live longer and fewer young workers are around to tax so the government can pay retiree benefits, the system is becoming increasingly unaffordable," she said. "Revenues fell below benefit costs this year with the economic crisis, as more people retired early and fewer workers were paying in benefits. So the Social Security system urgently needs reform."

Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Boston College's Center for Retirement Research and a professor at that school's Carroll School of Management, though more circumspect, also favors the notion of raising the normal retirement age.

"It merits consideration," she said. "Because retiring later is the best way to achieve a secure retirement. It all makes sense to work longer."

Working longer has many benefits: It increases the amount of money people can save for retirement, reduces the amount of money people need for retirement, and helps save Social Security, Munnell said.

But while Boehner's remedy might be gutsy, it still falls short of what could be and should be done, according to Mitchell and Munnell. Here are their ideas for other ways to help fix the Social Security shortfall.

"I wouldn't stop at age 70," Mitchell said. "I'd suggest we do what Sweden and other countries have already done, which is to index the retirement age thereafter to future changes in life expectancy."

Social Security reform is all the rage in Europe right now, Mitchell added. France recently announced plans to raise the retirement age from 60 to 62 in 2018 as part of an effort to get the country's spiraling public finances under control. Similar discussions are going on in Germany and Spain. "People are grumbling -- and striking -- all over Europe on this," Mitchell said. "Yet some progress is being made, which is encouraging."

According to Munnell, indexing the normal retirement age to life expectancy is a good idea, but it only solves some of the problem. It won't make people work longer.

She noted that in the 1930s, when Social Security set 65 as the normal retirement age, life expectancy for those aged 65 was 77. Today, life expectancy for those aged 65 is 82.

Robert Powell writes about retirement issues and produces the "Retirement Weekly" subscription newsletter.

Apple Inc. seems to be growing its presence in show business, as it just handed late-night comedians a fresh batch of new material.

19 min ago1:05 p.m. July 2, 2010 | Comments: 9

I don't disagree with moving the retirement age.. but the comment of "If you have substantial non-Social Security income while you're retired, why are we paying you at a time when we're broke?" is infuriating.. who the !#$!#$! is "we"???? "We", the American people didnt empty the Social Security fund through mismanagement or ridiculous congressional appropriations..."

- dfg1971 | 5:55 a.m. Today5:55 a.m. July 2, 2010

"Fix Social Security by hiking retirement age - MarketWatch - http://on.mktw.net/cvm1Ji" 8:01 a.m. EDT, July 2, 2010 from RJPIII

"Moves to make with your portfolio right now - MarketWatch - http://on.mktw.net/dzCycJ" 11:50 a.m. EDT, June 30, 2010 from RJPIII

"SEC falls short with proposed target-date fund rules - MarketWatch - http://on.mktw.net/d2lvCz" 8:26 a.m. EDT, June 24, 2010 from RJPIII

"Required reading.... A brother's prognosis puts life in focus - MarketWatch - http://on.mktw.net/9MJHsF" 8:03 a.m. EDT, June 24, 2010 from RJPIII

"Five common investing mistakes to avoid - MarketWatch - http://on.mktw.net/aDsfQg" 6:08 a.m. EDT, June 23, 2010 from RJPIII

John Prestbo

Indexed Investor

Global stock markets pay heavy toll

John Dvorak

Digital Dvorak

Microsoft is doomed in the mobile market

Jon Friedman

Media Web

Chaos News Network, where turmoil reigns

Al Lewis

Al's Emporium

Song remains the same for the economy

Robert Powell

On Retirement

Fix Social Security by hiking retirement age

Mark Hulbert

On the Markets

Contrarian reaction to gold's big plunge

Read Full Article »


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments


Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes