China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin and his counterpart Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung sign documents during a signing ceremony on June 29, 2010.
China and Taiwan signed a historic pact earlier today that opens the way to reducing trade barriers between these two neighbors. The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement is more than a trade agreementâ??it is a symbol of the strengthening ties between Taiwan and China.
But what is not yet clear is what the long-term implications of this bond may be and how it could affect the chances of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait between the two neighbors.
There are three primary scenarios that we could expect. The increasing economic interdependence could help to cement the political status quo, it could begin a slow move toward reunification, or it could cause public backlash in both neighbors. The risk of armed conflict is reduced in the first two scenarios, which is something that the United States, China, and Taiwan should all welcome. But the third is less positive, and it is perhaps the scenario that all three should work to avoid.
The pact signed today is another step toward warmer relations between the two neighbors. The pace of increased economic cooperation over the last few years has been phenomenal. There were no direct flights between Taiwan and China just two years ago, and now there are over 300 flights every week. There are now also direct postal links.
China is now Taiwanâ??s largest trading partner, with Taiwanese exports to China amounting to over $80 billion. A million Taiwanese now work on the mainland managing Taiwanese businessâ?? multi-billion dollar investments in China. The new pact can only accelerate thatâ??it promises to eliminate trade barriers on around $14 billion of Taiwanese exports to China and $3 billion worth of trade in the other direction within two years.
That does not mean that relations are â??normalâ?â??China does not recognize Taiwan, and no country that does so is able to have diplomatic relations with China. Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations or many other international fora. And where Taiwan is a member or an observer, there is a constant debate about the right name to use when referring to Taiwanâ??â??Chinese Taipei,â? â??Taiwan, China,â? or â??Taiwan, Province of Chinaâ? are all alternatives that Beijing prefers.
The reduced trade barriers could further deepen economic interdependence between China and Taiwan. There are already significant trade flows between the neighbors, but the pact accelerates the process further with greater investment flows, and an increasing number of tourists and workers helping both economies prosper.
There will be also be increased adjustment costsâ??especially in Taiwanâ??as more firms locate operations on the mainland. The Taiwanese authorities will need to help its economy move up the value chain, retraining workers for new roles and supporting them through the human transition of job loss and finding new work.
It would become increasingly clear as the two economies integrate further that it serves neither China nor Taiwanâ??s interest to disturb the political status quoâ??even if itâ??s a norm that they would not choose. Rising political tensions would just heighten the risk of undermining the economic investment that both neighbors have made in each otherâ??s economies. Both neighbors would have to find ways to avoid touching on the more sensitive political issues, and Taiwan would remain in the halfway house between independent nation and province of China.
But the status quo would slowly change in one respect. If China can sign an agreement to reduce trade barriers with Taiwan, then it is hard to see why other countries cannot, as well. Many countries have shied away from similar pacts with Taiwan because they are fearful of Chinaâ??s reaction. But that risk neutralizes itselfâ??and as a result, trade pacts would emerge with regional economic partners as well as other countries, including the United States. All that would help Taiwanâ??s economy prosper further.
This scenario is in many ways similar to the previous one. But the key difference is that the deepening economic links between China and Taiwan would have a spillover effect on political relations between the two neighbors. They would, in effect, build a unified economy and people would begin to wonder whether that should be the basis of a more unified political system.
The Taiwanese would perhaps believe that reunification is not such a bad thing as the number of Taiwanese residents on the mainland increases. And perhaps China is able to offer unification that is consistent with the Taiwanese people maintaining their way of lifeâ??in particularly maintaining the strong democratic system that has emerged and offering genuine autonomy to Taiwan.
Reunification would lead to Taiwan becoming part of China, but self-governing with its own legislature and executive branches. Aspects of foreign and defense policy might be run from Beijing, but everything else might remain the same.
This scenario is quite different. The process of acceleration in economic interdependence leads to a significant backlash in both neighbors in this scenario.
There could be increased joblessness in Taiwan as companies accelerate the process of relocating operations to the mainland where labor is cheaper. With little policy to address that risk, rising unemployment could lead to public anger. There could be confusion in China about why the fruits of the Chinese workersâ?? labor should lead to ever-increasing profits for Taiwanese-owned businesses.
Worker discontent in both neighbors would lead political leaders to adopt stronger protectionist stances, and the process of increasing economic interdependence would go into reverse gear. Flights would be suspended between the two neighbors, and rows would flare up in international fora at an ever-increasing frequency. The risk of military conflict in the Taiwan Strait would be heightenedâ??and the United States would find that it is left having to make difficult choices. To what extent will it protect its friend and ally Taiwan? And how would that affect relations with China, which has become a very important trading partner?
It has been about 60 years since Chiang Kai-Shek fled mainland China for Taiwanâ??leading to one of the worldâ??s most enduring political standoffs. That standoff has at times threatened to spillover into military action. But the immediate risk of military conflict seems somewhat reduced with the thawing of tensions and a new pact to reduce trade barriers that will accelerate economic interdependence. The key looking forward will be for the two neighborsâ??and their allies, including the United Statesâ??to continue to work toward maintaining reduced tensions.
Jitinder Kohli is a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Suzi Emmerling (foreign policy and security, energy, education, immigration)202.481.8224 or semmerling@americanprogress.org
Print: Megan Smith (health care, economic policy)202.741.6346 or msmith@americanprogress.org
Radio: Nicole Murphy202.478.6345 or nmurphy@americanprogress.org
TV: Andrea Purse202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org
Web: Erin Lindsay202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org
Site-Wide and Issue-Specific RSS Feeds
Chinese Strikes Put Virtuous Circle in Motion, by Anne Paisley
Improving a Critical Partnership between the United States and Taiwan, by Scott Lilly
China's Clean Energy Push, by Julian L. Wong
President Obama's Progressive China Policy , by Nina Hachigian, Winny Chen
Recovering, Restructuring, and Rebalancing. Oh My!, by Sabina Dewan
Scaling New Heights, July 1, 2010
Capital Ideas, July 1, 2010
Government Is Only as Good as Its Goals, June 9, 2010
Read Full Article »