This page had been redirected to a new URL, please update any bookmarks.
Disclaimer
Comment Standards
Subscribe by E-mail
Subscribe by RSS
All Atlanta Fed RSS
Other Fed Web Sites
Useful Links Beige Book Central Bank Research Hub, BIS Economic Indicators Calendar, New York Fed Economics Roundtable Glossary of Economics Terms NBER Information on Recessions and Recoveries Regional Economic Information Network (REIN), Atlanta Fed Government Resources BLS Handbook of Methods Bureau of Economic Analysis Bureau of Labor Statistics Congressional Budget Office Economic Data - FRED® II, St. Louis Fed Office of Management and Budget Statistics: Releases and Historical Data, Board of Governors U.S. Census Bureau Economic Programs White House Economic Statistics Briefing Room« Keeping an eye on Europe | Main
July 09, 2010 How close to deflation are we? Perhaps just a little closer than you thoughtSince last October, the consumer price index (CPI) has gone up an annualized 0.7 percent. On an ex-food and energy basis, the number is a little lower, at 0.5 percent. And the Cleveland Fed's trimmed-mean and median CPIs, at 0.7 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively, also put the recent trend in consumer prices in pretty low territory.
And this is before we take into account any potential mismeasurement, or "bias," in the construction of the CPI.
How big is the CPI's bias? Well, in 1996, the Social Security Administration commissioned a study on the accuracy of the CPI as a measure of the cost of living. This so-called "Boskin Commission Report" said the CPI was overstated by about 1.1 percentage points per year. The commission identified several sources of potential bias, but about half of the 1.1 percentage points resulted from new products and quality changes that were slow or otherwise imperfectly introduced into the price statistic.
Since that time, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has initiated a number of methodological changes that have reduced the CPI's mismeasurement. In a 2001 paper, Federal Reserve Board economists David Lebow and Jeremy Rudd put the CPI bias at only about 0.6 percentage points. And again, of this amount, the big share of the bias (about 0.4 percentage points) resulted from the imperfect accounting of new and improved goods.
Now, in an article (available to all in its working paper version) appearing in the latest issue of the American Economic Review, Christian Broda and David Weinstein say the earlier estimates of the new goods/quality bias may be a bit understated. The authors examine prices from the AC Nielsen Homescan database and conclude that between 1996 and 2003, new and improved goods biased the CPI, on average, by about 0.8 percentage points per year. If this estimate is accurate, consumer price increases since last October would actually be around zero, or even slightly negative, once we account for the mismeasurement of the CPI caused by new and improved goods.
But (oh, you just knew there was going to be a "but" in here, right?) the authors also point out that, because new goods are introduced procyclically, this bias tends to be larger during expansions and smaller during recessions. In other words, given the severity of the recession and the modest pace of the recovery, there may not be a whole lot of innovation going on right now in consumer goods. This is a bad thing for consumers, of course, but it would be a good thing for the accuracy of the CPI.
By Mike Bryan, vice president and senior economist at the Atlanta Fed
July 9, 2010 in Deflation, Inflation | Permalink
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef013485523b02970c
Listed below are links to blogs that reference How close to deflation are we? Perhaps just a little closer than you thought:
Comments hostName = '.typepad.com'; Post a commentComments are moderated and will not appear until the moderator has approved them.
checkLocal();If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign in
Name:
Email Address:(Not displayed with comment.)
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments:
commentSignIn(); Google Search WWW macroblog.typepad.com Recent Posts How close to deflation are we? Perhaps just a little closer than you thought Keeping an eye on Europe Increasing hours worked versus increasing hiring Another look at consumer sentiment and consumer spending Another view of the structural versus cyclical unemployment question The recovery: Job rich or job poor? How "discouraged" are small businesses? Insights from an Atlanta Fed small business lending survey Sticky-price CPI up slightly in April... Wait, what? Regulatory reform via resolution: Maybe not sufficient, certainly necessary Return of the swap lines July 2010 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Archives July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 Categories Africa Americas Asia Australia Banking Business Cycles Capital Markets Data Releases Deficits Deflation Economic Growth and Development Employment Energy Europe Exchange Rates and the Dollar Fed Funds Futures Federal Debt and Deficits Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy Financial System Fiscal Policy Forecasts Health Care Housing Immigration Inequality Inflation Interest Rates Katrina Labor Markets Latin America/South America Monetary Policy Money Markets Productivity Regulation Sarbanes-Oxley Saving, Capital, and Investment Small Business Social Security Taxes The "Landing" Strip This, That, and the Other Trade Trade Deficit Powered by TypePad var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3353208-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} widenThreeColumnCenter() Back To Top Disclaimer & Terms of Use : Privacy Policy : Contact Us : Home Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30309-4470 Beige Book Blogs Economic & Financial Highlights Economists Publications Research Centers Seminars Statistical Releases Business Continuity Check Relay Circular Letters Publications Retail Payments Risk Forum Reporting Supervision & Regulation Conferences Press Kit Press Releases Speakers Bureau Speeches Teacher Workshops Education Assessment FedFAQ Personal Financial Education Publications Resources for Teachers Visitors Centers & Tours Consumer Help & Complaints Frauds & Scams Publications Resources Contacts Foreclosure Resource Center Publications REsource Analytics Resources Overview Banking Economic Research Education & Consumer Resources The Federal Reserve Resources Subscriptions The Atlanta Fed Careers Federal Reserve System FedFAQ Holidays Visitors Centers & Tours var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3353208-2"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} _qoptions = { tags:"typepad.core" }; _qacct="p-fcYWUmj5YbYKM"; quantserve(); var captchaImgAttempts = 0; var allowAnonComments = '0'; var registrationRequired = 0; var registrationOptional = 1; var emailRequired = 1; var useAvatars = 1; var showSignInMessaging = 0; var jsonURL = "/.services/json-rpc"; var captchaSrc = "/.services/captcha?code_encrypted="; var alertCommentCannotBeBlank = "You can not leave anSubscribe by E-mail
Subscribe by RSS
All Atlanta Fed RSS
Other Fed Web Sites
« Keeping an eye on Europe | Main
Since last October, the consumer price index (CPI) has gone up an annualized 0.7 percent. On an ex-food and energy basis, the number is a little lower, at 0.5 percent. And the Cleveland Fed's trimmed-mean and median CPIs, at 0.7 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively, also put the recent trend in consumer prices in pretty low territory.
And this is before we take into account any potential mismeasurement, or "bias," in the construction of the CPI.
How big is the CPI's bias? Well, in 1996, the Social Security Administration commissioned a study on the accuracy of the CPI as a measure of the cost of living. This so-called "Boskin Commission Report" said the CPI was overstated by about 1.1 percentage points per year. The commission identified several sources of potential bias, but about half of the 1.1 percentage points resulted from new products and quality changes that were slow or otherwise imperfectly introduced into the price statistic.
Since that time, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has initiated a number of methodological changes that have reduced the CPI's mismeasurement. In a 2001 paper, Federal Reserve Board economists David Lebow and Jeremy Rudd put the CPI bias at only about 0.6 percentage points. And again, of this amount, the big share of the bias (about 0.4 percentage points) resulted from the imperfect accounting of new and improved goods.
Now, in an article (available to all in its working paper version) appearing in the latest issue of the American Economic Review, Christian Broda and David Weinstein say the earlier estimates of the new goods/quality bias may be a bit understated. The authors examine prices from the AC Nielsen Homescan database and conclude that between 1996 and 2003, new and improved goods biased the CPI, on average, by about 0.8 percentage points per year. If this estimate is accurate, consumer price increases since last October would actually be around zero, or even slightly negative, once we account for the mismeasurement of the CPI caused by new and improved goods.
But (oh, you just knew there was going to be a "but" in here, right?) the authors also point out that, because new goods are introduced procyclically, this bias tends to be larger during expansions and smaller during recessions. In other words, given the severity of the recession and the modest pace of the recovery, there may not be a whole lot of innovation going on right now in consumer goods. This is a bad thing for consumers, of course, but it would be a good thing for the accuracy of the CPI.
By Mike Bryan, vice president and senior economist at the Atlanta Fed
July 9, 2010 in Deflation, Inflation | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef013485523b02970c
Listed below are links to blogs that reference How close to deflation are we? Perhaps just a little closer than you thought:
Comments are moderated and will not appear until the moderator has approved them.
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign in
Name:
Email Address:(Not displayed with comment.)
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments:
Read Full Article »