Deflation Fears, Federal Reserve and Volatility

The growing fear of falling prices is exactly why we need to protect ourselves from rising ones -- and the money printing that produces them.

"Helicopter" Ben Bernanke appeared before Congress for his semiannual visit July 21. Given the near hysteria sweeping the financial world about possible deflation, I expected to see the Federal Reserve chief's feet put to the fire more than they were regarding when the next round of quantitative easing might begin.

Why Bernanke is called 'Helicopter' Ben

The only thing we have to fear . . . What many people seem to be missing is that the fear of deflation itself is perhaps the main reason more money printing by the Fed -- that's in essence what quantitative easing is -- is all but guaranteed. And that money printing will lead to inflation, not deflation (but for now, that is not the conventional wisdom).

Inflation does not mean the price of everything must go up uniformly. For example, let's pretend the Fed instantly doubled the amount of dollars everywhere. You don't have to be very clever to realize that the value of those dollars ought to have dropped in half. In reality, that would not precisely be the case, as all markets, and products, would respond differently.Msn.Video.createWidget('PlayerAd1Container', 'PlayerAd', 300, 213, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "player-money-articles-16x9", "player.vcq": "videoByUuids.aspx?uuids=9af6d252-c9b9-44ce-bb92-82f06cd996fa,5a1bfbc1-35be-4bfc-99ef-613d6a0f4b63,ce0429cc-f423-4ae3-9d41-dfdff7c9f0da,ad5c4197-afeb-403f-ae6b-117e409ccfeb,7057f895-f38e-4ac4-851c-e8ea1bd8d977,3e1dadd1-d627-4c73-9bd6-6ca635b7877a,86100b88-ee05-4aca-b30b-ea2cab7c8af4,97b30799-900b-4936-8f24-105b31a53edb,91260fda-1038-42c9-808d-917eeae9cc01,e88a871a-cd95-4974-9797-30d758f16e2d,a007f52c-c2b1-496e-bdfa-f3da6477a3f4,572391e9-a8dd-4a67-8ad7-695a4e739d82,a1a3b642-e0ee-42c8-86dc-057e20b0b2de,1378075f-6127-4e13-94ea-adc5f410c992", "player.fr": "iv2_en-us_money_article_16x9-Investing-ContrarianChronicles"}, 'PlayerAd1');Msn.Video.createWidget('Gallery4Container', 'Gallery', 304, 150, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "gallery-money-articles", "gallery.linkbackLocation": "bottom_left", "gallery.numColsGrid": "3", "gallery.categoryRequests": "videoByUuids.aspx?uuids=9af6d252-c9b9-44ce-bb92-82f06cd996fa,5a1bfbc1-35be-4bfc-99ef-613d6a0f4b63,ce0429cc-f423-4ae3-9d41-dfdff7c9f0da,ad5c4197-afeb-403f-ae6b-117e409ccfeb,7057f895-f38e-4ac4-851c-e8ea1bd8d977,3e1dadd1-d627-4c73-9bd6-6ca635b7877a,86100b88-ee05-4aca-b30b-ea2cab7c8af4,97b30799-900b-4936-8f24-105b31a53edb,91260fda-1038-42c9-808d-917eeae9cc01,e88a871a-cd95-4974-9797-30d758f16e2d,a007f52c-c2b1-496e-bdfa-f3da6477a3f4,572391e9-a8dd-4a67-8ad7-695a4e739d82,a1a3b642-e0ee-42c8-86dc-057e20b0b2de,1378075f-6127-4e13-94ea-adc5f410c992;videoByTag.aspx%3Ftag%3Dmoney_dispatch%26ns%3DMSNmoney_Gallery%26mk%3Dus%26vs%3D1;videoByTag.aspx%3Ftag%3Dbest%2520of%2520money%26ns%3DMSNmoney_Gallery%26mk%3Dus%26vs%3D1"}, 'Gallery4');For instance, wealthy people with lots of cash have different buying patterns than people who live paycheck to paycheck. So while co-ops in New York City, rare wine and fine art might become much more expensive, Volkswagens, midlevel real estate and goods at Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) might not. Meanwhile, the resulting increase in corporate cash would not necessarily cause businesses to hire more people, though some might.

When money is printed, it works itself through the system in odd ways. It can ultimately create jobs, but doesn't necessarily. The irrefutable fact is that the value of our lovely green paper has been reduced. That is what inflation is, the printing of money and consequent debasement of that same currency, not what the badly flawed Consumer Price Index shows.

The CPI is, of course, influenced by money printing, but anyone expecting to see inflation show up in there, given how tortured that statistic is, might be waiting for a long time, even as the price of goods and services in general ratchets up.'Eek' Pluribus Unum Looking at the stock market action from more of a week-to-week, rather than minute-to-minute, perspective, I'm reminded that quite often during the tail end of the real-estate bubble, in 2007 and 2008, I used to refer to the stock market as "all one trade." That is, it was going to be able to levitate until it collapsed, which is essentially what happened.

Since the 2009 low, it seems to me the all-one-trade phenomenon has become even more pronounced. The motion precipitated by computer-driven quantitative trading, trend-following systems and fast-money types makes the daily machinations noticeably more schizophrenic than in the past, and I think folks who try to interpret what the market's moves mean have to be much more judicious in drawing conclusions.

On July 16, when the market plunged more than 3%, it looked like the world was coming to an end. That carried over into the next week, when it seemed we would fall into the abyss as the market opened Tuesday. But by the time the closing bell rang, happy days were here again. Then Wednesday and Thursday saw some more wild Jekyll-and-Hyde action. Good luck ferreting out what all that motion meant.

In any case, I expect we will see more mindless careening about for a while, and I also think there is a high probability that the market will continue to trade in a wide range, frustrating both bulls and bears. Over time, the manic volatility in a market that ultimately goes nowhere will chew up lots and lots of quant funds, and I believe that eventually the math-oriented types will go out of business, leaving Wall Street safer for investors. But that is probably quite a way down the road, and in the interim the noise level is liable to stay extraordinarily high.

As for deflation versus inflation, in the near term we will probably continue to find ourselves in a period where we have symptoms of both.

At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein did not own or control shares of any company mentioned in this column.More from MSN Money

Chinese lesson: Better red than Fed

Will falling prices sink the economy?

The market's best bet right now

The housing bubble hangover, part 2

What's next: Inflation or deflation?

Rate this Article Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowThank you for rating.UGR('ratCntrl')High var avgRating=0;avgRating=8.111111; if(avgRating!=0){avgRating=avgRating/2;avgRating=Math.round(avgRating*100)/100;var sDisplayText="Average rating: " + avgRating + " from ";var usersCount=18;sDisplayText = sDisplayText + usersCount;if (usersCount==1)sDisplayText=sDisplayText + " user";else sDisplayText=sDisplayText + " users";avgRatingElem=document.getElementById("averageRating");avgRatingElem.innerText=sDisplayText;} View all top-rated articlesE-mail us your comments on this article Discuss in a message board MSN Money InsightNew Investor CenterMarket DispatchesJubak's JournalTop Stocks blogCompany FocusContrarian ChroniclesSmart Spending blogFast AnswersDecision CentersStart InvestingMutual FundsFind Hot StocksSimple StrategiesPower ToolsInvesting for IncomeReal Estate InvestingRecent Contrarian Chronicles ArticlesChinese lesson: Better red than Fed 07/16/2010The market's best bet right now 07/09/2010The housing bubble hangover, part 2 07/02/2010More . . .Contrarian ChroniclesAbout Contrarian ChroniclesLearn the Contrarian Chronicles lingoSubscribe to Market Rap on Fleckenstein CapitalFund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.Msn.Video.createWidget('Gallery8Container', 'Gallery', 500, 230, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "gallery-money-article-site-wide"}, 'Gallery8');msft.msn._ic.cid='ahjk5w59quehxh999uhgku8ek7vs5ya2';msft.msn._ic.pst=false;msft.msn._ic.pgn=1; Join the discussion!Be the first to add a comment.To add a comment, pleasesign in /*MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertiseRSSHelpFeedbackSite mapAbout our ads© 2010 Microsoft/*

When money is printed, it works itself through the system in odd ways. It can ultimately create jobs, but doesn't necessarily. The irrefutable fact is that the value of our lovely green paper has been reduced. That is what inflation is, the printing of money and consequent debasement of that same currency, not what the badly flawed Consumer Price Index shows.

The CPI is, of course, influenced by money printing, but anyone expecting to see inflation show up in there, given how tortured that statistic is, might be waiting for a long time, even as the price of goods and services in general ratchets up.'Eek' Pluribus Unum Looking at the stock market action from more of a week-to-week, rather than minute-to-minute, perspective, I'm reminded that quite often during the tail end of the real-estate bubble, in 2007 and 2008, I used to refer to the stock market as "all one trade." That is, it was going to be able to levitate until it collapsed, which is essentially what happened.

Since the 2009 low, it seems to me the all-one-trade phenomenon has become even more pronounced. The motion precipitated by computer-driven quantitative trading, trend-following systems and fast-money types makes the daily machinations noticeably more schizophrenic than in the past, and I think folks who try to interpret what the market's moves mean have to be much more judicious in drawing conclusions.

In any case, I expect we will see more mindless careening about for a while, and I also think there is a high probability that the market will continue to trade in a wide range, frustrating both bulls and bears. Over time, the manic volatility in a market that ultimately goes nowhere will chew up lots and lots of quant funds, and I believe that eventually the math-oriented types will go out of business, leaving Wall Street safer for investors. But that is probably quite a way down the road, and in the interim the noise level is liable to stay extraordinarily high.

As for deflation versus inflation, in the near term we will probably continue to find ourselves in a period where we have symptoms of both.

At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein did not own or control shares of any company mentioned in this column.More from MSN Money

Read Full Article »