If you've been paying attention this past decade, it won't surprise you to learn that the country's policy elites are in the midst of a destructive, well-nigh unhinged discussion about the future of the nation. But even by the degraded standards of the Washington establishment, the growing panic over government debt is shocking.
Christopher Hayes responds to Joan Walsh's claim that recently published JournoList e-mails prove his "Obama worship."
Despite public outrage and thirst for justice, there's a decent chance that BP will escape from the catastrophe relatively unscathed.
First, the facts. Nearly the entire deficit for this year and those projected into the near and medium terms are the result of three things: the ongoing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Bush tax cuts and the recession. The solution to our fiscal situation is: end the wars, allow the tax cuts to expire and restore robust growth. Our long-term structural deficits will require us to control healthcare inflation the way countries with single-payer systems do.
But right now we face a joblessness crisis that threatens to pitch us into a long, ugly period of low growth, the kind of lost decade that will cause tremendous misery, degrade the nation's human capital, undermine an entire cohort of young workers for years and blow a hole in the government's bank sheet. The best chance we have to stave off this scenario is more government spending to nurse the economy back to health. The economy may be alive, but that doesn't mean it's healthy. There's a reason you keep taking antibiotics even after you start to feel better.
And yet: the drumbeat of deficit hysterics thumping in self-righteous panic grows louder by the day. Judging by its schedule and online video, this year's Aspen Ideas Festival was an open-air orgy of anti-deficit moaning. The festival is a good window into elite preoccupations, and that its opening forum featured ominous warnings of future bankruptcy from Niall Ferguson, Mort Zuckerman and David Gergen does not bode well. Nor does the fact that there was a panel called "America's Looming Fiscal Emergency: How to Balance the Books." This attitude isn't confined to pundits. The heads of Obama's fiscal commission have called projected deficits a "cancer."
The hysteria has reached such a pitch that Republican senators (joined by Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson) have filibustered an extension of unemployment benefits because it was not offset by spending cuts. Keep in mind, the cost of the extension for people unlucky enough to be caught in the jaws of the worst recession in thirty years is $35 billion. The bill would increase the debt by less than 0.3 percent.
This all seems eerily familiar. The conversation—if it can be called that—about deficits recalls the national conversation about war in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. From one day to the next, what was once accepted by the establishment as tolerable—Saddam Hussein—became intolerable, a crisis of such pressing urgency that "serious people" were required to present their ideas about how to deal with it. Once the burden of proof shifted from those who favored war to those who opposed it, the argument was lost.
We are poised on the same tipping point with regard to the debt. Amid official unemployment of 9.5 percent and a global contraction, we shouldn't even be talking about deficits in the short run. Yet these days, entrance into the club of the "serious" requires not a plan for reducing unemployment but a plan to do battle with the invisible and as yet unmaterialized international bond traders preparing an attack on the dollar.
Perhaps the most egregious aspect of the selling of the Iraq War was its false pretext. It never really was about weapons of mass destruction, as Paul Wolfowitz admitted. WMDs were just "what everyone could agree on." So it is with deficits. Conservatives and their neoliberal allies don't really care about deficits; they care about austerity—about gutting the welfare state and redistributing wealth upward. That's the objective. Deficits are just what they can all agree on, the WMDs of this manufactured crisis. Senator John Kyl of Arizona, speaking on Fox, has come out and admitted as much. All new spending increases must be offset, he said, but "you should never have to offset the cost of a deliberate decision to reduce tax rates on Americans." So there you have it.
Remember that the Iraq War might have been prevented had more Congressional Democrats stood up to oppose it. Instead, many of those who privately knew the entire enterprise was a colossal disaster in the making buckled to right-wing pressure and pundit hawks and voted for it. That mistake is being repeated. Despite White House economists' full realization of the need for stimulus in the face of astronomically high unemployment, the New York Times has reported that the political minds inside the White House, David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel, have decided that the public has no appetite for increased spending. "It's my job to report what the public mood is," Axelrod explained. He then showed up on ABC's This Week to wave the white flag, saying that the president would continue to press to extend unemployment benefits; conspicuously omitted was any mention of aid to state governments, which had originally been included in the president's June letter to Congress asking for a new stimulus package.
There is hope, however: the public is nowhere near as obsessed with the deficit as are those in Washington. According to a USA Today/Gallup poll, 60 percent of Americans support "additional government spending to create jobs and stimulate the economy," with 38 percent opposed. A Hart Research Associates poll published in June showed that two-thirds of Americans favor continuing unemployment benefits. There is also very little public appetite for "entitlement reform," a k a cutting Social Security.
The lesson of the Iraq War is that over the long haul, good politics and good policy can't be separated. If the White House is tempted to support bad policy in the short term because it seems less risky politically, it should give John Kerry a call and ask him how that worked out for him with Iraq.
If you like this article, consider making a donation.
Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.
Whoo buckaroos, if wmds was never a concern then we have committed war crimes and lied before the United Nations... not a trivial pursuit!!! And Wall Street excess sending countries into bankruptcy is also a sign of bankrupt morality... might be a sign of a country begginf ofr decline and letting the poor go into free-fall is not to wise at a time when we believe there is not need for the rule of law... it is an open invitation to anarchy and a sign of aa banana republic about to slip on it's own lack of appeal...
Pontificus-I like your line that American wealth was built on economic and political liberty.With the explosion of lobbyists and a conservative Supreme Court you are right.The wealthy will continue to manipulate politics and the multi national corporations "personhood" will keep that status quo humming along.
Unfortunately since you and your fellow free marketeers sold out America on your trade tour it has a huge imbalance in our economy and overall lives as Americans.The Gilded Age led to a Depression and so did the Deregulation Age.Which next set of circumstances do you want to tie your wagon to.
Hey Chris, when are you going to apologize to your readers for intellectual dishonesty? Or apologize to Palin?
rafael bolero, You are describing all of America's poor, not just migrant workers.
We're still stuck with Reaganomics, and we keep repeating the same economic cycle. Consider the flat indifference of Americans when Clinton removed funding from welfare to use it to pay for ongoing corporate welfare. We saw that these "reform" policies strip the poor of fundamental rights while violating international human rights standards (per the UN's UDHR). We're OK with that.
"Workfare" is a replacement workforce; companies will lay off a portion of their workforce, alleging financial hardship, and simply replace the workers with workfare labor, at a fraction of the wages. With each round of layoffs, more laid-off workers end up becoming cheap workfare labor, themselves. Few of these people are immigrants.
Workfare is a powerful tool for suppressing wages, stripping out workers' protections, and blocking unionizing efforts. Too bad. Trickle down economics was an utter failure, but trickle-up poverty is working very well.
Logically, to get the economy back on track, we would cut our greatest costs and least necessary expenses. That would be our ongoing wars/military spending, the wild growth of the prison industry and handouts to the rich. Instead, government is getting us accustomed to the idea of allowing them to swipe all the money we paid into Social Security, and reallocate it to cover the costs of ongoing war, corporate tax relief, etc.
Thanks to our welfare "reform," the infant mortality rate among our poor now exceeds that of most Third World nations, and the life expectancy of our poor has fallen below that of most Third World countries. That is a stunning change in America, but Americans remain indifferent. As long as they remain indifferent, there will be no change.
America as a scene from Blade Runner is fast approaching. I believe the first Mellon said that depression is nothing more than the national assets returning to thier rightfull owners. That should tell you something.Remember also that Cheney said that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. Where are all the Republican nut jobs now? Running around screaming about "the deficit". Doing again what they do best, scare the ignorant american public into voting for the exact same people who will eventually take everyfreakingthing from them. The're coming after your Social Security and Medicare next people and they're going to get it. And the final irony will be that a Democratic president will deliver it to them. The start will be raising the retirement age to 70. If your working class and below 55 you can bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.
Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC
Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana
Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York
North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania
Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah
Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Read Full Article »
