Over the years, I have described myself politically as a â??Jacob Javits* Republican.â? For those of you unfamiliar with the Senator from NY, Javits was a social progressive, a fiscal conservative, â??a political descendant of Theodore Rooseveltâ??s Progressive Republicanism.â?
After he â??retiredâ? in 1980, the GOP took a very different turn: The emphasis on Fiscal conservatism was lost. Balanced budgets were no longer a priority. In terms of electoral politics, the embrace with the Religious Right was a deal with the devil. It married the party to a backwards combination of social regressiveness and magical thinking. Ideology trumped facts, and conflicting data and science was ignored.
In short, the party became more focused on Politics than Policy.
I bring this up as an intro to David Stockmanâ??s brutal critique of Republican fiscal policy. Stockman was the director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan. His NYT OpEd â?? subhed: How the GOP Destroyed the US economy â?? perfectly summarizes the most legitimate critiques of decades of GOP economic policy.
I can sum it up thusly: Whereas the Democrats have no economic policy, the Republicans have a very bad one.
The details are what makes Stockmanâ??s take so astonishing. Here are his most important observations, of which I find little to disagree with:
"? The total US debt, including states and municipalities, will soon reach $18 trillion dollars. That is a Greece-like 120% of GDP.
"? Supply Side tax cuts for the wealthy are based on â??money printing and deficit finance â?? vulgar Keynesiansism robed in the ideological vestments of the prosperous classes.â?
"? Republicans abandoned the belief that prosperity depended upon the regular balancing of accounts "â? government, trade, central banks private households and businesses.
"? Once fiscal conservatism was abandoned, it led to the serial financial bubbles and Wall Street depredations that have crippled our economy.
"? The Nixon administration defaulted on American obligations under the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement.
"? Who is to blame? Milton Friedman. In 1971, he persuaded President Nixon to unleash on the world paper dollars no longer redeemable in gold.
"? According to Friedman, â??The free market set currency exchange rates, he said, and trade deficits will self-correct.â? What actually occurred was â??impossible.â? Stockman calls it â??Friedman's $8 trillion error.â?
"? Ideological tax-cutters are what killed the Republicans' fiscal religion.
"? Americaâ??s debt explosion has resulted from the Republican Party's embrace, three decades ago, of the insidious Supply Side doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts.
"? The GOP controlled Congress from 1994 to 2006: Combine neocon warfare spending with entitlements, farm subsidies, education, water projects and you end up with a GOP welfare/warfare state driving the federal spending machine.
"? It was Paul Volcker who crushed inflation and enabled a solid economic rebound â?? not the Reagan Supply Side Tax cuts."? Republicans believed the â??delusion that the economy will outgrow the deficit if plied with enough tax cuts.â?
"? Over George W. Bush 8 years in office, non-defense appropriations gained 65%."? Fiscal year 2009 (GWB last budget): Tax-cutters reduced federal revenues to 15% of GDP â?? lower than they had been since the 1940s.
"? The expansion of our financial sector has been vast and unproductive. Stockman blames (tho but not by name): 1) Greenspan, for flooding financial markets with freely printed money; and 2) Phil Gramm, for removing traditional restrictions on leverage and speculation.
"? The shadow banking system grew from a mere $500 billion in 1970 to $30 trillion by September 2008 (see Gramm, above).
"? Trillion-dollar financial conglomerates are not free enterprises â?? they are wards of the state, living on virtually free money from the Fed's discount window to cover their bad bets.
"? From 2002 to 2006, the top 1% of Americans received two-thirds of the gain in national income.
I find it fascinating that the most incisive criticism of the irresponsible GOP policies has comes from two of its former stars: Bruce Barlett and now David Stockman. Sure, Krugman, Stiglitz, DeLong and others have railed against Bush policies for years. But it seems to take an insiderâ??s critique to really give the debate some punch.
Its funny, but when I criticize Bush, I get accused of being a liberal Democrat (I am not). I am simply giving my honest perspective of an utterly ruinous set of irresponsible policies that did lasting damage to America. The critiques of Obama does not generate the same sort of reaction. I suspect brain damaged partisans of the left suffer from somewhat different cognitive deficits than brain damaged partisans of the right.
Hereâ??s to hoping that reality-based economic policies are somewhere in our future.
>
Note: Brain damaged partisan comments will be unceremoniously deleted
>
Source: Four Deformations of the Apocalypse DAVID STOCKMAN NYT, July 31, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html
____________
* If you want a better idea of Javitâ?? politics, he was an early advocate of civil rights and an opponent of discrimination and segregation. Javits was against government involvement in medical decisions â?? he oppsoed legislation on birth control, abortion, etc. â?? unlike some of todayâ??s so-called Libertarians hypocrites. He was unhappy with the witch hunt atmosphe during the Cold War, and publicly opposed funding the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Fiscally conservative, he was for low taxes, a balanced budget, but also supported modest regulation to prevent the private sector from running amuck. He supported low taxes, a balanced budget, reduced military spending, no overseas wars unless absolutely necessary to defend the country. He supported the initial foray into Viet nam, but switched, becoming an early Senatorial opponent of the war in 1967.
Most of all, he was a pragmatic, bi-partisan Senate member, who worked across the aisle with both sides to produce legislation for the public good. The Javits Convention Center in NYC is named after him, as are numerous buildings in various SUNY campuses, as well as a Federal Fellowship Program.
In 1979, he was diagnosed with Lou Gehrigâ??s disease, and lost the GOP primary to political sleazeball Alfonse Dâ??Amato.
You wonâ??t get an argument from me that the GOP fumbled the fiscal football
Bravo!
Great Post. We surely need to hope that one day soon we can have some leadership that lives in economic reality. After watching GWB spend so much money and increase the deficit, no balancing of the budget, I will never forget how sick to my stomach I felt watching McCain and Obama during the Presidential debates. Both men were so clueless when it came to economic policy. I knew we were in trouble whoever won the election.
I am a former Red State GOP supporter who helped raise significant money for George W. Bushâ??s campaign in 2,000.
I left the party because of Bushâ??s fiscal policies. He has done lasting damage to the nation, but I am forced to agree with Stockman that it was a long time coming.
Bruce Bartlett was the first Republican to call him out Bush for his irresponsibility, and was vilified by the party for it.
(This post got me to finally comment)
â??Here's to hoping that reality-based economic policies are somewhere in our future.â?
Now THAT IS â??magical thinkingâ?.
Dream on, BR. Before we can have such a renaissance in Bananamerica, we would first have to see a rebirth of critical thinking and honest debate, instead of partisan demonizing and polarization of the sheeple.
We are A Very Long Way from that happy situation.
Your blog is one of the few remaining places where such activities are taking place. Thanks.
Good stuff from both Stockman and Barry. I also recall Senator Javitz, he was too legit to succeed in todays world . ..I would add the press is also quilty of politics over policy. Can you imagine Stockman or Barry on the Glenn Beck show ? Both would most likely call the man a buffoon and walk off. I would love to see it !
Move over St Paul, rosey scenario Stockman also had an epiphany. 30 years after being one of the authors, along with Kudlow and Laffer, of Reaganâ??s tax and trade policies, he now says it wasnâ??t a good idea to cut taxes and increase spending because the budget deficits will be huge. He now recognises that free trade policies have resulted in a lower living standard for the woking classes, He bemoans the huge wealth gap but doesnâ??t point out that the Reagan tax cuts,lowering the top marginal rates, went mostly to the wealthy and the Reagan tax increases, social security and user fees, were paid by the working classes. He should of titled his editorial â??Mistakes were made but no by meâ?, it appears to be working for Greenspan.
Not much to add on Stockmanâ??s piece but I will say I read it before noticing who the author was. I nearly fell off the chair when I finally checked who wrote it.
re: Sen. Javitz â?? a true statesman while still alive. Although I leaned Dem in my younger days, growing up in RI there was no more of a statesman than John Chafee. How I wish these guys were still around.
Read Full Article »