COMMENT
Breadcrumb trail navigation:
By Arvind Subramanian
Published: August 16 2010 22:29 | Last updated: August 16 2010 22:29
As India enters its 64th year since independence, its economic dynamism presents a paradox. On most measures of market friendliness, it lags behind Latin America, and even sub-Saharan Africa. It is still more closed to trade and foreign capital than most other countries; still hampered by extensive controls on economic activity, including onerous labour laws; and still dominated by a large public sector. In short, it should be growing at 5 per cent, not 8½ per cent, a year.
Long-run growth depends on the quality of supporting public institutions. True, the India of today is less of a regulatory nightmare than before the opening-up in 1991. Some institutions "“ those that hold elections, preserve financial stability and regulate telecommunications, for example "“ have worked well. But these exceptions apart, the state is weak and fraying. Policy reforms do not deserve the spectacular acceleration in growth that the economy has delivered.
You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.
Read Full Article »