Fed chairman Ben Bernanke needs your help. Bernanke is looking for a word that means longer than extended to tell people how long he plans to keep interest rates low. And what he is looking for is a word that means a really, really long time--really, really. Superextended. Overextended. Superduper-extended.
So this is what the economic science of central banking has become? A bunch of ivy league phds sitting around playing a high stakes game of Mad Libs. That's one of the points Alan Blinder makes today in a very good editorial in the Wall Street Journal. Blinder's editorial is about the fact that the Fed by lowering short-term interest rates to nearly zero, and expanding its balance sheet by buying Treasury bonds and mortgage bonds and other assets has already used its main tools of rejuvenating the economy. Now it has to take the nontraditional routes. Blinder runs through what those moves could be, and raises some doubts about whether any of them will be all that successful. But one of the potential moves Blinder points to looks very promising. Plus, here at the Curious Capitalist we are devoted to giving Bernanke every helping hand we can. He was, after all, our Main Squeeze last year. So he's got that going for him. I don't think the reality is as dire as Blinder paints for the Fed and its ability to further stimulate the economy. Here's why:
It's mainly because the Fed has one major policy lever at its finger tips, and it is one that Blinder points out.
In October 2008, the Fed acquired the power to pay interest on the balances that banks hold on reserve at the Fed. It has been using that power ever since, with the interest rate on reserves now at 25 basis points. Puny, yes, but not compared to the yields on Treasury bills, federal funds, or checking accounts. And at that puny interest rate, banks are voluntarily holding about $1 trillion of excess reserves.So the third easing option is to cut the interest rate on reserves in order to induce bankers to disgorge some of them. Unfortunately, going from 25 basis points to zero is not much. But why stop there? How about minus 25 basis points? That may sound crazy, but central bank balances can pay negative rates of interest. It's happened.
This is the third policy option that Blinder mentions and even though he clearly thinks it is the best option for the Fed, Blinder still downplays it. And I am not sure why. I have wondered for a long time why the Fed continues to grant banks what is essentially interest on their risk-free savings accounts. When the Fed first started paying the interest on the bank reserves it hit me as a backdoor bailout for the banks, which made some sense at the time. But not now. Blinder says there is no guarantee that banks even if they were charged money to put reserves at the Fed would start lending. They may invest in other safe areas, like money market funds. Yes, but banks would only be happy with those low-interest rates for so long. They would eventually either loan out the money or put it into corporate bonds or municipal bonds, which lowers the cost of borrowing for others. What's more, it's not just banks that park money at the Fed. Foreign investors and other central banks do that too when they buy Treasuries. What about charging a fee to foreign investors who only buy US Treasuries? That might cause some of those investors to put their money more directly into our economy by buying corporate bonds, or even equities. Again, lowering the cost of capital for borrowers other than the Fed.
You could argue that pushing banks to lend money they don't naturally want to could produce bad loans and send us right back to where we started. But Blinder's own suggestion for what Bernanke could do, but he is not thinking about is this:
There is a fourth weapon, which the Fed chairman has not mentioned: easing up on healthy banks that are willing to make loans. Given bank examiners' record of prior laxity, it is understandable that they have now turned into stern disciplinarians, scowling at any banker who makes a loan that might lose a nickel. That tough attitude keeps the banks safe, but it also starves the economy of credit.
That to me seems like a clearer path to bad loans. One we tried in the past decade and don't want to try again. By removing the incentive for banks to do nothing with their money could produce some bad loans, it will probably produce a number of good ones as well, as long as bank examiners are on the job.
Lastly, there's the part that you can help out with.
The FOMC has been telling us repeatedly since March 2009 that the federal-funds rate will remain between zero and 25 basis points "for an extended period." This phrase is intended to nudge long rates lower by convincing markets that short rates will remain near zero for quite some time. The Fed's second option for easing is to adopt new language that implies an even longer-lasting commitment to a near-zero funds rate. Frankly, I'm dubious there is much mileage here. What would the new language be? Hyperextended? Mr. Bernanke is a clever man; perhaps he can turn a better phrase.
Yes. The past year has shown that Bernanke is clever. But not nearly as you the clever as the readers and commenters on Curious Capitalist. So what say you? The suggestion box is open. What word means longer than extended?
On the one hand we have the debt-hawks, the politicians, the media and the vast majority of the bloggers worried about the size of the federal debt. The word most often bandied about is "unsustainable." . The (wrong) belief is that the government has borrowed too much and will not be able to service its debts. So, they say, the government should borrow less and cut its debts, thereby removing money from this money-starved economy. . On the other hand, we have those same debt-hawks, politicians, media and bloggers trying to figure out how to get the banks to lend more -- in short, to get the public sector to borrow more. This is the same public sector that is starved for money, going bankrupt in droves, and does not have access to the unlimited funds the fed has -- so the proposed economic solution is more public sector borrowing and less federal borrowing !! . In any other science this sort of madness would be labeled for exactly what it is -- madness. In economics, it's one of the subjects for serious discussion by leading economists. The other subject: Tax increases to further remove money from the economy. . And people think our average of one recession every five years is just an accident. It isn't. It's the result of madness. . Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Stephen, how about "Enroned" or "Fastowed"? That former company and CFO were really good at extending deals, etc. and putting off problems forever "¦or almost forever, until everything blew up, but I digress. Or since Bernanke is so clever, he should honor himself with "Bernanked": to extend infinitely without consequences by the good grace of God Bernanke.
Not sure what a good tem for it would be. I understand what he means by extended though. What they mean is when Americans are finely back on their feet and ready to make that big purchase the fed will pull the rug out.
Thanks to Sarah Palin, who refudiated basic grammar rules, we can make up words and get away with it. Therefore, can "extendiate" define "to extend further"? Or thanks to Wile E. Coyote (and that evil little bast@rd Road Runner) we can use "cliffhanging" "“ . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpGHDX5KIhk . "¦and Stephen, Barbara, and other CC teammates, what are your definitions?
Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.
The Curious Capitalist Favorite Links Barry Ritholtz Brad DeLong Calculated Risk Econbrowser Econlog Ezra Klein Felix Salmon Floyd Norris Greg Mankiw Growthology James Pethokoukis John Gapper Justin Fox Marginal Revolution Mark Thoma Megan McArdle Nicholas Carr Paul Kedrosky Paul Krugman Philip Coggan Planet Money Roger Parloff Ryan Avent Swampland The Stash adFactory.getCmAd(300, 250, "global", "tout").write(); adFactory.getCmAd(300, 100, "article", "tout").write(); ArchiveAugust 2010SMTWTFS1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 More News from Our Partners CNN MIT unveils swimming, oil-cleaning robots The new Digg: Don't believe the snipe What does your 'digital reflection' show? Huffington Post Karen Mills: SBA Disaster Assistance: Then and Now Olivier Blanchard: A Problem Shared Is a Problem Halved: The G-20's "Mutual Assessment Process" SCVNGR Launches Rewards DailyFinance.com Dell Beats Out HP to Acquire 3Par What's Apple Planning for Next Month? Federal Reserve Is Running Out of Options Rotten Tomato Comic-Con Ketchup: Guillermo Del Toro to helm Haunted Mansion flick RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Clash of the Titans and Repo Men Dude! It's the 15 Manliest Movies Ever! Life Adolf Hitler: Up Close Paris Liberated: Rare, Unpublished Pakistan Floods: Disaster Mounts More on TIME.com » Three Ways to Fix Social Security The First Victims of Health Care Reform Is the Dow Sniffing a Big Slowdown? Quotes of the Day » "Throw a backpack of cash over the fence into Mexico, and what are we going to do? Charge someone with littering in a foreign country?" T.J. BONNER, president of the union representing Border Patrol agents, explaining the challenges of keeping Mexican drug cartel money from crossing the border More Quotes » var ad = adFactory.getAd(88, 31); ad.setPosition(13) ad.write(); Today in Pictures » Reunion Stay Connected with TIME.com Learn More » Subscribe to RSS Feeds Sign Up for Newsletters Add TIME Widgets Read TIME Mobile on Your Phone Become a Fan of TIME Get TIME Twitter Updates adFactory.getCmAd(115, 42, "homepage", "tout").write(); © 2010 Time Inc. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | RSS | Newsletter | TIME For Kids | LIFE.com Subscribe | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Reprints & Permissions | Opinion Leaders Panel | Help | Site Map TiiAdTrackRevSci(); function tiQuantcast() { } _qoptions={ qacct:"p-5dyPa639IrgIw", labels:tiQuantcast() } var _sf_async_config={uid:3088,domain:"time.com",pingServer:"ptimeinc.chartbeat.net"}; (function(){ function loadChartbeat() { window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime(); var e = document.createElement('script'); e.setAttribute('language', 'javascript'); e.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript'); e.setAttribute('src', (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://s3.amazonaws.com/" : "http://") + "static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat.js"); document.body.appendChild(e); } var oldonload = window.onload; window.onload = (typeof window.onload != 'function') ? loadChartbeat : function() { oldonload(); loadChartbeat(); }; })(); Powered by WordPress.com VIP var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10268691-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} var _sf_async_config={uid:3088,domain:"curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com",pingServer:"ptimeinc.chartbeat.net"}; (function(){ function loadChartbeat() { window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime(); var e = document.createElement('script'); e.setAttribute('language', 'javascript'); e.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript'); e.setAttribute('src', (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://s3.amazonaws.com/" : "http://") + "static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat.js"); document.body.appendChild(e); } var oldonload = window.onload; window.onload = (typeof window.onload != 'function') ? loadChartbeat : function() { oldonload(); loadChartbeat(); }; })(); _qoptions={qacct:'p-18-mFEk4J448M',labels:'language.en,posttag.ben-bernanke,posttag.macroeconomics,posttag.federal-reserve,vip.timecuriouscapitalist'}; try{COMSCORE.beacon({c1:2,c2:7518284});}catch(e){} st_go({'blog':'5320466','v':'wpcom','user_id':'0','post':'11547','subd':'timecuriouscapitalist'}); ex_go({'crypt':'RDZ8LFkxbXF2TVluJVFmT0xoZkVaUCVrM3R3cCU2Wi10dT9ta3VEZG89N3pwOFdMRVB3Rls4VHhUemlpOFY0W1V+X0prOW16LU5rfktuc29XPUtiMXlVUyY9aiszRzc2T3lKJnlXcEpSOTBkQVRYd3xWYVIvZEN+MV9fflpoNTlBSFk2aTRSUGRiUy1XWGFGK0pJU0xHUkFUX3BWWXFlWTBrOHF0My01ZkJxT1VYQm8ld01qQmZOZWxERm1TaDJaXSZ3NEpCfCZNR1ZxM2tkZiVJZysmajdbWy0vTFU='}); addLoadEvent(function(){linktracker_init('5320466',11547);}); Read Full Article »