An article yesterday bragged about what an efficient profit engine the Fed is (and therefore implied how much money WE make – that’s just not how a modern monetary system works, however). It went like this:
“The most profitable bank in the United States of America isn’t Jamie Dimon’s JP Morgan Chase or the rejuvenated Bank of America. In fact, it doesn’t have any ATMs, and it pays out almost all its earnings to you and your neighbors.
It’s the Federal Reserve, which is expected to post another year of record profits in 2010.”
They went on to blame the Fed for missing the crisis and reacting late (all correct) and then the article took a staggering turn for the worse:
Once the crisis hit, the Fed intervened in unprecedented and expensive ways that have weakened the dollar and punished savers with rock-bottom interest rates. Bernanke vastly increased the size of the Fed’s balance sheet, which now stands at $2.3 trillion vs. about $800 billion before the crisis began.
But as much as it may have contributed to our financial problems, the Fed may also be part of the solution "” by helping to keep the deficit from growing even larger.
They go on to explain how the Fed is effectively an arm of the U.S. government in that all profits are turned over to the Treasury. But then they start describing the Federal Reserve as though it is some great engine of profits and symbol of thriving capitalism. The problem is, government exists to advance the prosperity of its citizenry – not to profit at its expense.
What occurred in 2009 when the Fed expanded their balance sheet was essentially one giant asset swap. The Fed bought private sector assets in exchange for reserves, alleviated the pressures in the credit markets and essentially helped to shore up the banking sector. This helped normalize the banking system of course, but did little to nothing for Main Street. Hence, why we’ve seen an incredible rebound in bank profits and little to no rebound in Main Street’s profits.
This policy might have made some sense in 2009, however, it makes little sense now. What the Fed is essentially doing is stealing income streams from the private sector. By the estimates of the Fed this could total $75B this year. So, the banks are getting what many call a “free lunch” via interest on reserves (which will amount of about $2.5B), but the truth is that the Fed is now debiting the private sector. There are no credit markets to fix now. There are no bank balance sheets to fix. You could easily argue that the Fed is acting to the detriment with these purchases now as their operations have little impact on reducing rates and have a marginal impact (if any) on Main Street.
The article wraps up by saying that this reduction in the deficit is good:
The U.S. government’s 2010 fiscal year closes on Thursday (fiscal years run from October to September). The books will close with the federal deficit at about $1.3 trillion. But without the Fed’s earnings, which could approach $75 billion, the deficit picture would be noticeably worse.
Of course, regular readers know this is nonsense. Public sector surplus is private sector deficit (net household financial income = current account surplus + government deficit + ÃŽ”business non-financial assets). The truth of the matter here is that the deficit reduction caused by the Fed is not good. Now don’t get me wrong. I am not in favor of the banks getting this money and the interest back. But if Treasury were wise (or understood how our monetary system worked) they’d do something more creative with these funds – call it the “Wall Street to Main Street Wealth Transfer Fund” or something like that.  We’re taking $75B a year from the banks and putting it to good use by investing in Main Street!
Instead, we have (mostly) men in control who continue to misdiagnose our problems and therefore continue to apply the wrong solutions. At a time of low inflation an extra $75B isn’t exactly making or breaking the U.S. budget situation and with no solvency risk in the USA (we are a monopoly supplier of currency in a floating exchange rate system) the government doesn’t need that extra $75B. You wonder why the economy is such a mess? Look no further than the men in charge of Treasury and the Fed.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————
The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.
A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.
“the wall street to main street transfer fund”. That is actually a great idea.
[Reply]
“Instead, we have (mostly) men in control who continue to misdiagnose our problems and therefore continue to apply the wrong solutions.”
Agree. Actually two cases:
1. They know the real problem, but they tried to find a easy way out, thinking they may be lucky.
2. They really misdiagnosed it.
I tend to believe case 1. They know what the real problem is, but there is political will to deal with it, as it is painful.
[Reply]
making sense Reply:September 30th, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Meant to say there is NO political will to deal with it.
[Reply]
I vote £75B in payroll tax cuts!
[Reply]
Blobby Reply:September 30th, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Make that $75B
[Reply]
It was correct in 2009, it is wrong in late 2010. This we agree.
But claiming the Fed is stealing from the private sector to support the banking system shows a blatant lack of understanding of the mandate of the Fed.
Again, I agree on the correct in 2009 and wrong in late 2010 — but the rest of this article is just whining drivel. The Fed cannot control the economy and it shouldn’t try to do things it cannot accomplish — all it can do is influence monetary conditions. This is ultimately up to the private sector to get healthy again, future prosperity does not depend on the Fed ‘creating’ it.
[Reply]
TPC Reply:September 30th, 2010 at 11:13 AM
I wish that I could agree that an unemployement rate of 9.6% and a mandate of full employment made my comments mere “drivel”.
[Reply]
Just to clarify…
This is bullish and we need to buy stocks, correct?
[Reply]
Darrell Reply:September 30th, 2010 at 10:37 AM
It appears at this point that all is bullish and we should, to quote a somewhat popular TV shrill, “Buy, Buy, Buy!!”
Guess the screw will turn someday.
[Reply]
TPC Reply:September 30th, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Isn’t everything bullish these days?
[Reply]
re: “the Fed is effectively an arm of the U.S. government in that all profits are turned over to the Treasury….The problem is, government exists to advance the prosperity of its citizenry "“ not to profit at its expense.”
They seem to have forgotten that 97% of the money supply was created by private banks and our entire monetary system is debt-based. If they ever understood and agreed that “government exists to advance the prosperity of its citizenry”, they would join us in the proposals to end fractional (and now fictional) reserve lending and return the money creation power back to the people.
Read Full Article »