The Federal Reserve was already making a high-stakes economic bet with QE2. Now it's also a political bet, and that doesn't bode well for Bernanke or the Fed.
What happened to the independent central bank?
I started to write an ironic, playful column comparing the Federal Reserve's decline to that of the Yankees' shortstop, Derek Jeter. Both are still pretty good compared to what else is out there, but they're sure not what they used to be.
But the more I thought about the problems the Fed is having these days, the more I realized that what's going on isn't funny. It's creepy.
A group composed largely of Republicans is running an advertising campaign against the Fed's program of buying $600 billion of Treasury securities, and some Democrats are defending the program. Just before that ad campaign was announced, one of the Fed's highest-profile governors, Kevin Warsh (of whom more later), who'd voted for the program, publicly questioned it—something I've never seen happen before.
All of this threatens to make the Fed look both uncertain and enmeshed in partisan politics, which would be devastating for its economic clout and moral authority. I'm no Fed worshipper, and am more than a little dubious about its "Quantitative Easing 2" program. But we need an independent central bank, not an organization that sticks its finger in the air to test the political winds before it moves.
Even before the Republican attack, our central bank was rapidly losing influence in the world, relative to other players. Part of that is because our country's influence is shrinking—but another, big part of the problem is QE2, which is econ-speak for "printing money."
The Fed board of governors was split publicly about whether to embark on QE2, making the Fed vulnerable right off the bat. The policy is being opposed publicly by other governments and central banks. That's a problem, because we don't want them dumping dollars. Financial markets—including the currency and commodities markets and parts of the long-term bond market—are sending a "no confidence" vote.
The first round of quantitative easing consisted of the Fed buying securities to forestall a financial panic last year by showing that it wouldn't let major financial institutions run out of cash. That was imaginative and clever, and it worked.
No easy fix
But QE2 is a whole different game than QE1—and a riskier one. It's a gamble on something that's never been tried before. The idea is to goose the economy by reducing long-term rates by buying Treasury securities, supporting asset prices, and letting the dollar decline gradually in order to create jobs here by making our exports cheaper and imports more expensive.
First, it's not clear if the Fed can get those rates down—or whether it would help the economy much if it does.
Second, it won't take much to turn the intended gradual decline in the dollar into a rout, given how financial markets tend to pile on when they smell a profit opportunity. "The trend is your friend," as they say on trading desks.
This brings us to Kevin Warsh, a former Morgan Stanley mergers-and-acquisitions guy who's been the Fed's liaison with Wall Street since George W. Bush appointed him in 2006. In a striking speech last week, Warsh said that, "I am less optimistic than some that additional asset purchases [by the Fed] will have significant, durable benefits for the real economy." He raised the prospect of QE2 being ended before the Fed meets its goal of buying $600 billion of securities.
Hello? What on earth is up with Warsh, who's friendly with Bernanke? Beats me. Warsh declined comment. If I had to guess, my bet would be that Warsh's speech wasn't coordinated with the Republican attack, even though Warsh is a Republican (as is Bernanke).
But the Republican attacks, Warsh coming out against a policy he supported, and all that other opposition have put Bernanke in a tough position.
He was already making a high-stakes economic bet with QE2—and now it's a political bet, as well. If QE2 succeeds, which might happen, it could help the economy. If it doesn't work and Bernanke decides to pull the plug on it, it will look like he bowed to political pressure. If QE2 fails badly, it could imperil the dollar and our financial system—and protecting them is the Fed's primary responsibility.
The Fed has been the world's preeminent central bank for decades, and Derek Jeter has given the Yankees 15 great years. Jeter's days as a star are numbered. I sure hope the Fed's aren't.
Also from Fortune.com:
How the banks can save Bernanke's bacon
I think this sums it up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpOvrVbEwl0 enjoy
"First, it's not clear if the Fed can get those rates down—or whether it would help the economy much if it does." Down?? Down to what, zero? Where were long term rates when housing prices were going straight up? Anybody who thinks our financial troubles are due to high interest rates...is high!!
Ben Bernanke/FED are simply not intelligent. They are paid full time to study the economy. They have all the data in the world. Yet Bernanke denied there was a bubble until it popped. And now he is spending trillions (printing them of course, not his own money) to re inflate that same bubble. The idea that he will give money to the banks so that they will lend to us benefits.... the Banks! Banks use his money to give themselves bonuses first. And cheap money is what created the bubble in the first place. And not a word on what caused the crisis. As if it was an act of God. It isn't. The housing bubble and the credit crisis are both man-made, -and the Fed could help us understand what happened. Instead Bernanke is busy printing money. Bernanke is either really stupid or in league with GoldmanSachs. Depending on what he is, he should be either replaced or tried. But he got re-appointed and kept doing the same thing.
Couldn't agree more....independence is critical to maintaining a viable Fed or any other institution that is relied upon for clear, honest direction.
"...moral authority."
You jest of course, Mr. Sloan.
Screen name (Select one with 3-12 characters; Numbers and letters only)
Enter your e-mail address below and we will send you an e-mail with a link and code to reset your password.
Already have the reset code?
Reset code
New password
Password
Forgot password?
Not a member yet?
Screen name
Password
Type what you see in the grey box
CNNMoney will use the information you submit in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. By clicking on "sign up" you agree with CNNMoney's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and consent to the collection, storage and use of this information in the U.S. subject to U.S. laws and regulations. (learn more)
This service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Thanks!
Please check your e-mail and click the link to confirm your membership. Then, you'll be ready to participate in all activities and conversations on our site.
Go to your Profile page
Be the first to know when there is breaking financial news with timely alerts delivered straight to your inbox.
Fortune's Philip Elmer-DeWitt brings you Mac news from outside the reality distortion field.
Fortune columnist Anne Fisher answers your career-related questions.
Read Full Article »