COMMENT
Breadcrumb trail navigation:
By Stephen Roach
Published: November 22 2010 18:53 | Last updated: November 22 2010 18:53
The Federal Reserve's grand experiment is a flop. Not only has the second round of quantitative easing roiled markets, but it has become a lightning rod for debate in Washington, academia, and in policy and political circles around the world. The US central bank's uncharacteristic defensiveness has only deepened the suspicion "“ putting over 30 years of hard-won credibility and independence at risk. Sadly, this backlash is well founded. The Fed is running a real risk of destabilising a still precarious post-crisis world.
Unable to cut the price of overnight money any further, America's monetary authority has turned, instead, to the quantity dimension of its arsenal. While the efficacy of this approach is debatable for a US economy in the throes of a protracted deleveraging, a deeper question arises when probing the Fed's motivation. Justification is offered in the form of a new buzz-phrase "“ "mandate-deficient" growth.
You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.
Read Full Article »
