By Robert Higgs Sunday December 5, 2010 at 8:46:49 PM PST
Consider the following commentary on the economic situation:
Foolhardy procedures which are divorced from economic realities, or whose economic implications are not understood by their promoters, do not perforce become sanctified and wise merely by designating them as "action"; tilting at windmills does not draw water.
[W]hen a recovery program, which, while it may appear effective, depends for its efficacy upon much the same kind of "cheap money" inflation which . . . was the main cause of the recession from 2007 to 2009, then the present recovery must ultimately prove as illusory as the boom from 2001 to 2007, and it is the duty of economists to pierce the veil of illusion.
Certainly the recovery movement to the date of this writing [December 2010] is a peculiar one: it is shot through with anomalies. With [more than 15 million estimated to be] unemployed . . . with governmental relief rolls still at high levels, . . . there very obviously is something wrong, somewhere.
The fact would seem to be that the authorities who are undertaking the "management" of the current recovery, and congratulating themselves that prosperity is returning because they "planned it so," are utterly oblivious of the fact that recovery is being engineered largely by the same means which produced the last boom "“ and recession. With this difference: whereas the banking system during the recent boom was producing an investment credit inflation by extending credit to business men and corporations, Government is now assuming the role of inducing new deposit currency in the banking system and thereby producing a consumption credit inflation. The Federal Government, instead of private corporations, is issuing the bonds which the banks are now purchasing, thereby inflating the deposit currency structure all over again. These "created" funds are in this instance being used principally to finance consumption expenditures through relief disbursements, make-work projects, and the like. . . . [T]he current inflation tends to conceal and to preserve the fundamental disequilibria which so prolonged the recession after 2007 and which we are now carrying over therefrom without having once squarely faced the problem of correcting them.
Notice, however, that the foregoing commentary, except for the terms in bold font, was written not yesterday, but, in its final form, in 1937. The authors, C. A. Phillips, T. F. McManus, and R. W. Nelson, placed this commentary, along with a wealth of related evidence and analysis, in their unjustly neglected book Banking and the Business Cycle: A Study of the Great Depression in the United States (New York: Macmillan, 1937). The quoted passages, which appear on pp. 212-14, originally read as follows:
Foolhardy procedures which are divorced from economic realities, or whose economic implications are not understood by their promoters, do not perforce become sanctified and wise merely by designating them as "action"; tilting at windmills does not draw water.
[W]hen a recovery program, which, while it may appear effective, depends for its efficacy upon much the same kind of "cheap money" inflation which . . . was the main cause of the Great Depression, then the present recovery must ultimately prove as illusory as the New Era of the "?twenties; and it is the duty of economists to pierce the veil of illusion.
Certainly the recovery movement to the date of this writing [February 1937] is a peculiar one: it is shot through with anomalies. With [8 million to 12 million estimated to be] unemployed . . . with governmental relief rolls still at high levels, . . . there very obviously is something wrong, somewhere.
The fact would seem to be that the authorities who are undertaking the "management" of the current recovery, and congratulating themselves that prosperity is returning because they "planned it so," are utterly oblivious of the fact that recovery is being engineered largely by the same means which produced the last boom"”and depression. With this difference: whereas the banking system during the "?twenties was producing an investment credit inflation by extending credit to business men and corporations, Government is now assuming the role of inducing new deposit currency in the banking system and thereby producing a consumption credit inflation. The Federal Government, instead of private corporations, is issuing the bonds which the banks are now purchasing, thereby inflating the deposit currency structure all over again. These "created" funds are in this instance being used principally to finance consumption expenditures through relief disbursements, make-work projects, and the like. . . . [T]he current inflation tends to conceal and to preserve the fundamental disequilibria which so prolonged the Great Depression and which we are now carrying over therefrom without having once squarely faced the problem of correcting them.
When policy makers repeat in the early twenty-first century the same mistakes they made in the 1920s and 1930s, and when mainstream economists fail to understand that these policies are misguided now, just as they were then, one can scarcely argue that the mainstream understanding of business fluctuations has advanced at all during the past eighty years. Indeed, the typical macroeconomist today is much inferior to Phillips, McManus, and Nelson, in no small part because today's economists, owing to the high level of aggregation they employ in their theoretical and empirical work, miss what is most important for understanding business booms and busts: policy-induced structural disequilibria and malinvestments.
Categories: American History, Business, Economics, Employment, Great Depression, Inflation, Money and Banking, Unemployment
2 Comment(s)I agree completely, and I will present our current situation in another way.
Shrinking employment occurs because business owners are being rational. It is better to miss some business by expanding later, or shrinking now, than to expand early and risk bigger losses if sales drop. Ironically, stimulus interferes with the sales signals and market stability that would encourage businesses to expand. This slows expansion and reduces employment.
The current stimulus is being distributed over a period of years, so it will interfere with business decisions and employment for years. Promises of higher taxes are also increasing risk and decreasing employment.
We have recently emerged from a four year experiment in giant stimulus. The housing bubble WAS a stimulus bubble. The government borrowed through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to loan to people to buy houses (construction, consumer goods, appliances) and to re-finance housing to buy everything.
The $2 trillion in sub-prime financing in the last four years delivered dollars to the people who spent it immediately on all types of stuff. That is a $2 trillion stimulus.
We are living now in the “post stimulus” economy produced by that giant stimulus. How do we like it?
That was the result when people promised to pay it back. What will happen now when more money is being handed out, with no hope of repayment? We have only the prospect of higher taxes on productive people, or high inflation, and probably both. Tax the rich, tax the middle class, and tax the poor.
A Tested Stimulus Plan We just tried a giant stimulus through housing policy.
Andrew_M_Garland | Dec 5, 2010 | Reply
Thank you, Professor Higgs, for the quote from a book I had never heard of, but must now read.
Michael Smith | Dec 6, 2010 | Reply
1 Trackback(s) Dec 6, 2010: from Some Links Post a CommentName (required)
E-mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
« Previous Post YouTube RSS Authors Alvaro Vargas Llosa (1)Anthony Gregory (190)Art Carden (57)Carl Close (37)David Beito (92)David Theroux (124)Edward Lopez (4)Emily Skarbek (5)Gabriel Gasave (2)James A. Montanye (1)James L. Payne (5)Jeffrey Rogers Hummel (1)Jonathan Bean (77)Josh Kaplan (2)Karen Kwiatkowski (9)Lindsay Boyd (6)Mary Theroux (94)Melancton Smith (11)Paul Theroux (1)Peter Klein (55)Randall Holcombe (96)Robert Higgs (180)Roland de Beque (1)Wendy Honett (11)William Shughart (35)William Watkins (3) Also Available Free Email Updates New Books
Free Shipping On Orders Over $60! (Within U.S.A.)
SECURING CIVIL RIGHTS: Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms By Stephen P. Halbrook THE NEW HOLY WARS: Economic Religion vs. Environmental Religion in Contemporary America By Robert H. Nelson HOUSING AMERICA: Building Out of a Crisis Edited by Randall G. Holcombe, Benjamin PowellRACE AND LIBERTY IN AMERICA: The Essential Reader Edited by Jonathan J. Bean
THE DECLINE OF AMERICAN LIBERALISM By Arthur A. Ekirch, Jr.
PARTITIONING FOR PEACE: An Exit Strategy for Iraq By Ivan Eland
DEPRESSION, WAR, AND COLD WAR: Challenging the Myths of Conflict and Prosperity By Robert Higgs
RECARVING RUSHMORE: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty By Ivan Eland
THE FOUNDERS’ SECOND AMENDMENT: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms By Stephen P. Halbrook
THE CHE GUEVARA MYTH: And the Future of Liberty By Alvaro Vargas Llosa
More Books
Categories Select Category Afghanistan Africa Agriculture American History Art Audio Austrian School of economics Bailouts Books Budget and Tax Policy Business California Canada Charity China Civil Liberties Civil Society Constitution Corporatism Corruption Criminal Justice Culture Defense Disaster Management Drugs Economics Education Elections Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Europe Family Fascism Federal Reserve Food Free Market Georgia Germany Global Warming Government subsidies Great Depression Gun Control Healthcare Housing Humor Immigration Imperialism Inflation Insurance Integrity Intellectual Property Iran Iraq Japan Labor Land use Latin America Law Liberty Media Mercantilism Middle East Military Money and Banking Monopoly and Antitrust Morality Nanny State Nationalization Natural Law Nuclear Weapons Pakistan Peace Personal Liberty Philosophy Police Politics Poverty Power Presidential Power Price control Privacy Privatization Propaganda Property Rights Racism Regulation Religion Russia Science Read Full Article »