COMMENT
Breadcrumb trail navigation:
By Martin Wolf
Published: December 9 2010 21:54 | Last updated: December 9 2010 21:54
The Bank of England's monetary policy committee confirmed its 0.5 per cent base rate of interest on Thursday. Thus the UK remains, with the Federal Reserve of the US, the Bank of Japan and even the European Central Bank in the very low interest rate club. Critics argue that this policy "“ even more than quantitative easing, in which the Federal Reserve is now engaged and the Bank of England may engage again "“ is unfair and inefficient. Are they right? "Yes and no" is the answer. These are bad policies. But alternatives are worse.
Ros Altmann, a well-known British expert on pensions, has sounded the charge in the UK. She has argued that the policy amounts to an unfair tax on savers in general, and the old in particular, undermines pension plans and distorts the market for long-term government bonds. To this, Andrew Smithers of London-based Smithers & Co adds, in a critique of quantitative easing published in October, that the policy can work only by creating new and perhaps even more damaging asset bubbles in future.
You have viewed your allowance of free articles. If you wish to view more, click the button below.
Read Full Article »
