The Surprising Resilience of New Europe

Anders Aslund Project Syndicate December 16, 2010

larger | smaller

comments: 0

KIEV "“ Two years ago, five of the ten new East European members of the European Union "“ the three Baltic states, Hungary, and Romania "“ appeared to be devastated by the global financial crisis. Social unrest, huge devaluations, and populist protests loomed.

And then nothing. Today, all of these countries are returning to financial health and economic growth without significant disruption. No country has even changed its exchange-rate regime. Old Europe should learn from New Europe's untold success.

The cause of the East European financial crisis was a standard credit boom-and-bust cycle. East European countries attracted large international capital flows, owing to loose global monetary policy and accommodating business conditions. In the end, short-term bank lending became excessive and was used to finance a splurge on real-estate investment and consumption, while inflation took hold.

Moreover, current-account deficits piled up into substantial private-sector foreign debt, while public finances were in good order everywhere but Socialist-led Hungary. This crisis of success and overheating was reminiscent of East Asia in 1997-1998.

East Asia's nations, as well as Russia in 1998 and Argentina in 2001, exited their crises through devaluation. A choir of prominent American economists, including Paul Krugman, Kenneth Rogoff, and Nouriel Roubini, claimed that Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania must also devalue. None of them did, yet they raised themselves out of the crisis.

The Baltic states had many reasons not to devalue. Their aim is to adopt the euro as soon as possible, which devaluation would have complicated. As their small and open economies were already heavily "euro-ized," the pass-though of higher foreign prices into inflation would have been huge following any devaluation, which would also have broken their otherwise reasonably healthy banking systems.

Instead, the three Baltic governments opted for "internal devaluation," reducing public-sector wages and costs. In 2009, all three countries cut public expenditures by 8-10% of GDP, which "“ remarkably "“ was politically easier than marginal cuts. When cuts are big, people realize how severe the crisis is, and the politically impossible becomes necessary. Small cuts are usually delivered evenly, aggravating all public services, while deep cuts have to be selective and structural. Therefore, they may improve economic efficiency.

All the countries in crisis cut their public administration and wages. Latvia slashed state salaries by 35% and the number of public agencies by half. It also closed half of its excessive number of hospitals and sacked superfluous teachers, of which there was one for every six children before the crisis.

Estonia, Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria have carried out similar reforms, though not quite as radical. (Lithuania, for example, pursued a higher-education reform to enhance efficiency and quality.) And, though state revenues have fallen with recession, forcing a few countries to hike value-added taxes, none has increased income taxes, and none of the seven countries that had in place a flat-rate income tax has abandoned it. As a result, these countries exit the crisis more productive.

Contrary to expectations "“ and to the Greek and French experiences "“ social unrest has been minimal. Extremists on neither the right nor the left have benefited. In the European Parliament elections in June 2009, center-right parties won a majority in all ten eastern EU countries, and center-right parties now govern in nine of them, with Slovenia the sole exception.

The liberal right has never been stronger in Eastern Europe. The communists have been wiped out and the socialists badly weakened. The extreme right has lost support everywhere but Hungary.

This year, responsible center-right parties have won three surprise victories "“ in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Latvia. The new Czech foreign minister, Karel Schwarzenberg, stated: "We won by telling the truth. Populism is no longer popular."

Most remarkable was the victory of Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis on October 2. His coalition increased its share of parliamentary seats from 45% to 63%, although GDP fell last year by a shocking 18%. Dombrovskis blamed his irresponsible predecessors, and voters clearly saw him as the most credible problem solver.

Three countries in the region "“ Hungary, Latvia, and Romania "“ required emergency standby programs with the International Monetary Fund. The IMF had learned from East Asia, posing fewer conditions and offering more budget financing, because the problems were temporary and not structural. In addition, the EU provided financing, whereas the European Central Bank, which could have given swap credits, played no helpful role.

As a result of their successful crisis resolution, the EU's East European members look better both fiscally and structurally than the old eurozone members. Of the 12 members of the eurozone in 2001, only two (Finland and Luxembourg) have public debts of less than 60% of GDP to compare with nine of the ten new eastern members. Only Hungary has a large public debt. East Europeans suffered from high private-sector debt, which they largely avoided transforming into public debt.

All of this, together with post-crisis improvement in EU institutions (such as financial regulators) contributes to greater European convergence. Whereas Eastern Europe's economies look healthier than the eurozone countries, they are not abandoning the EU project. On the contrary, this year Estonia qualified to enter the eurozone in January 2011.

Anders Ã?slund, a senior fellow of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, is the author of The Last Shall Be the First: The East European Financial Crisis, 2008-10.

You might also like to read more from Anders Ã?slund or return to our home page.

Share Tweet

Reprinting material from this website without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact distribution@project-syndicate.org. var OB_langJS = 'http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js'; var OBITm = '1292502431965';var OB_raterMode = 'none';var OB_recMode = 'rec'; var OutbrainPermaLink='http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/aslund25/English'; if ( typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined' )OutbrainStart(); else { var OB_Script = true; var str = unescape("%3Cscript src=\'http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js\' type=\'text/javascript\'%3E%3C/script%3E"); document.write(str); } print recommend Send link clip secure rights COMMENTS

You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.

COMMENTS

You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.

Username Password New registration Forgotten password AUTHOR INFO Anders Ã?slund Anders Ã?slund is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. His latest book, with Andrew Kuchins, is The Russia Balance Sheet. MOST READ MOST RECOMMENDED MOST COMMENTED The Irrepressible 1930's Robert Skidelsky Europe's Inevitable Haircut Barry Eichengreen The Retreat of Macroeconomic Policy J. Bradford DeLong Alternatives to Austerity Joseph E. Stiglitz The Euro at Mid-Crisis Kenneth Rogoff A New World Architecture George Soros No Time for a Trade War Joseph E. Stiglitz Avatar and Empire Naomi Wolf Let A Hundred Theories Bloom George Akerlof and Joseph E. Stiglitz The Risky Rich Nouriel Roubini Europe's Inevitable Haircut Barry Eichengreen Alternatives to Austerity Joseph E. Stiglitz Thinking the Unthinkable in Europe Dani Rodrik Land for Peace in Kosovo Charles Tannock The Euro at Mid-Crisis Kenneth Rogoff ADVERTISEMENT PROJECT SYNDICATE

Project Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.

Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 53 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.

PROJECT SYNDICATE War and Peace Shlomo Ben-Ami Is an Islamic civil war underway? Can democracy take root in the Middle East? Is the "war on terror" winnable? ...read more The Ethics of Life Peter Singer Is human life really always sacred? Is Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection right - or left? Is charity a virtue or an obligation? ...read more Roads to Prosperity Dani Rodrik Is free trade always the best policy? Did the global financial crisis of 2008 prove that developing countries should not open their financial systems? ...read more © Project Syndicate 1995 - 2010 How to become a member | Member papers | Support us | About us | Contact us _qoptions={ qacct:"p-f8E80KYHdFRZg" }; var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10108778-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} _bizo_data_partner_id = 790 var OBCTm='1292510578203';

You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.

Read Full Article »

Comment

Show comments

The Surprising Resilience of New Europe

Related Articles