The old market wisdom says investors shouldn't fight the Fed. But these days, what China does matters a whole lot more than what Bernanke's crew says.
"Don't fight the People's Bank of China," is my new mantra for investing in today's global financial markets.
It replaces that old Wall Street saw "Don't fight the Fed."
Right now, what China's central bank does on currency exchange rates, money supply and interest rates is way more important to the global economy and global markets than interest rates and quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve or sovereign debt purchases and bailouts engineered by the European Central Bank.
The People's Bank of China, China's central bank, drives the world's financial markets.
But before I ship "Don't fight the Fed" off to the Valhalla for old slogans to drink mead with "Remember the Maine" and "Kilroy was here," I want to extract some lessons for how to turn this new mantra into investing profits. No mantra works all the time Just as "Don't fight the Fed" worked very profitably most of the time, I think "Don't fight the People's Bank" will produce good profits most of the time.
How central banks operate
All you've got to do to turn good profits into great profits is avoid some of the explosions.
And that's where "Don't fight the Fed" can give us some important clues for when to follow "Don't fight the People's Bank" and when to ignore it.Msn.Video.createWidget('PlayerAd1Container', 'PlayerAd', 300, 213, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "player-money-articles-16x9", "player.vcq": "videoByUuids.aspx?uuids=194e420d-121a-4368-a349-a761b217face,693e3332-fd65-4473-a88b-18438da73f79,e246e92a-90c3-4a84-8ef8-5e339fa24b5a,9376f180-702a-4c1d-ac92-687f1869fdfb,b2e251e5-20cd-4234-ba20-55c8d6a71d44,f0a9c7a8-ddda-4d97-9c16-1c73abb37df7,980dbda0-1fde-4c24-870a-e8eb0955c708,dae34ed8-a679-4049-b66c-a039ce5fcd92,17823b1c-f083-4a59-8656-5875e152bad9,4e96e2af-164a-4d64-9ea3-7194bc6589df", "player.fr": "iv2_en-us_money_article_16x9-xxx-xxx"}, 'PlayerAd1');Msn.Video.createWidget('Gallery4Container', 'Gallery', 304, 150, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "gallery-money-articles", "gallery.linkbackLocation": "bottom_left", "gallery.numColsGrid": "3", "gallery.categoryRequests": "videoByUuids.aspx?uuids=194e420d-121a-4368-a349-a761b217face,693e3332-fd65-4473-a88b-18438da73f79,e246e92a-90c3-4a84-8ef8-5e339fa24b5a,9376f180-702a-4c1d-ac92-687f1869fdfb,b2e251e5-20cd-4234-ba20-55c8d6a71d44,f0a9c7a8-ddda-4d97-9c16-1c73abb37df7,980dbda0-1fde-4c24-870a-e8eb0955c708,dae34ed8-a679-4049-b66c-a039ce5fcd92,17823b1c-f083-4a59-8656-5875e152bad9,4e96e2af-164a-4d64-9ea3-7194bc6589df;videoByTag.aspx%3Ftag%3Dmoney_dispatch%26ns%3DMSNmoney_Gallery%26mk%3Dus%26vs%3D1;videoByTag.aspx%3Ftag%3Dbest%2520of%2520money%26ns%3DMSNmoney_Gallery%26mk%3Dus%26vs%3D1"}, 'Gallery4');For example, "Don't fight the Fed" was a winning strategy in 1997, 1998 and 1999.
The technology-dominated Nasdaq Composite ($COMPX) climbed 22% in 1997 and then accelerated to a 40% gain in 1998. Stocks rose because the Federal Reserve, rather than acting to let air out of the bubble, was pumping it in.
Money supply, as measured by M2, rose by 8.5% from December 1997 to December 1998, according to data from the Federal Reserve.
And in 1999? The Fed still didn't throttle back -- much. Money supply grew by 6% that year, providing plenty of cash to drive stock prices even higher. The Nasdaq climbed 86% that year.
In 1998 and 1999, studiously bearish investors questioned stock market valuations and called the run-up in stocks unsustainable. They argued that what was then called the "Greenspan put," a virtual guarantee from the Fed that it would pump money into the markets if any crisis threatened the markets, was encouraging reckless investing in stocks with wildly unrealistic valuations.
They were right, of course. Eventually. But if you shorted on that wisdom in 1998 or 1999, you got killed. The bottom didn't fall out of stocks until 2000. The Nasdaq fell 39% in 2000, an additional 21% in 2001 and an additional 32% in 2002. Investors who had been arguing that stocks were overvalued for years were totally vindicated, although many of them had pulled out of the market to lick their wounds. (As John Maynard Keynes put it, "Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent.")
These bears had fought the Fed, and the Fed won. Which illustrated aptly the mantra's cynical view of the financial world: You can be oh, so right, and the Fed oh, so wrong, and for much of the time all your superior knowledge, wisdom and smarts don't matter. The Fed, even if it's dead wrong, will win, because it's got the trillions to back up its point of view.
Remember this history as we look at the present. How wrong is the Bank of China? I think there's a good chance that the People's Bank of China is going to turn out to be disastrously wrong about how to run China's economy.
The country's central bank has apparently decided that it's OK to let bank lending run wild, to rely on price controls to fight inflation, to keep the yuan cheap versus the dollar and to discourage saving by keeping deposit rates well below the rate of inflation. The bank's monetary policy risks letting inflation get so far out of control that there won't be any way to gently step on the brake.
And that wouldn't be good. Even thinking about it as an investor makes me want to run for the hills.
But not yet, my mantra says. While the People's Bank may be wrong, its moves will still move the markets. And it would be foolish to bet against the People's Bank.
For a while at least. What, China worry? China's government is apparently much less worried about inflation than are overseas investors and market analysts.
On Dec. 14, in the first official statement after the weekend meeting of the Central Economic Work Conference, Zhang Ping, the head of the National Development and Reform Commission, told state television that Beijing plans to set a 4% target for consumer price inflation next year, up from 3% in 2010.
And the government doesn't seem to be worried at all that inflation, at 5.1% in November, is running way above its targets for 2010 and 2011.
Reports out of Beijing suggest the government will set the 2011 quota for new bank lending at 7.5 trillion yuan, about $1.1 trillion. That's the same quota that the government set for 2010 and that banks will almost certainly exceed by the end of this month. 2010 was supposed to be the year that China reined in bank lending from the stunning doubling in new loans in 2009 from 2008 in response to the global financial crisis. Instead, once you add in off-balance-sheet lending, the total for 2010 will be essentially unchanged from 2009. And the new target will continue that pace.
The effects have been huge. The money supply has climbed by 50% in the last two years. Even for a country growing as fast as China, that's wildly inflationary.
Continued: Don't fight the inflationMore from MSN Money and MoneyShow.com
10 reasons the bond crunch mattersJubak on video: US Fed facing difficult new dilemmaTax deal says we're deadbeatsChina-backed stock winners for 2011 The new market norm: VolatilityThe 3 blue chips you must own1 | 2 | next >
Rate this Article Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowThank you for rating.UGR('ratCntrl')High var avgRating=0;avgRating=8; if(avgRating!=0){avgRating=avgRating/2;avgRating=Math.round(avgRating*100)/100;var sDisplayText="Average rating: " + avgRating + " from ";var usersCount=38;sDisplayText = sDisplayText + usersCount;if (usersCount==1)sDisplayText=sDisplayText + " user";else sDisplayText=sDisplayText + " users";avgRatingElem=document.getElementById("averageRating");avgRatingElem.innerText=sDisplayText;} View all top-rated articlesE-mail us your comments on this article Discuss in a message board Stock PicksJubak's PicksCheck out Jim's top stocks for the next 12 months.
Jubak's How To StartRead how to invest with Jubak's showcase portfolio.
Jubak Picks 50Follow the long-term portfolio from Jim's book "The Jubak Picks."
Dividend stocks for income investorsSee Jim's new portfolio to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment.
Connect with JimBecome a fan on FacebookSubscribe to his e-mail newsletterDecision CentersStart InvestingMutual FundsFind Hot StocksSimple StrategiesPower ToolsInvesting for IncomeReal Estate InvestingRecent Articles by Jim Jubak10 reasons the bond crunch matters 12/13/2010Tax deal says we're deadbeats 12/09/2010The new market norm: Volatility 12/06/2010More...Jim's Most Recent Top Stocks PostsJoy Global's ride far from overBoeing gets its groove backCopper miner showers investors with cashFund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.Msn.Video.createWidget('Gallery8Container', 'Gallery', 500, 230, {"configCsid": "MSNmoney", "configName": "gallery-money-article-site-wide"}, 'Gallery8'); 1CommentNewestOldestBestWorstControversialFun-bags23 hours agoJim..Jim.. Jim (Jubak)
Once again my head slammed on my desk from the absolute boredom of your articles. C'mon buddy--I believe your heart is in the right place--trying to guide us with our investments. But, Jim--You can spice it up once in awhile. You know--get out of the missionary position and mix it up a little.
Last week you wrote a piece--- that for once--didn't immediately start sleep mode--it was on Spain and silver. You seemed to have fun. I could imagine your little fingers gliding across the keys as if you were playing a grand piano. Your viewers were applauding you, Jim. That article was, well uh, interesting!
Jimmy, for the new year do us a favor; Think outside of the cubicle.
P.S.
Thanks for the invite to meet you at The Money show. But, I still have articles of yours to put me to sleep and I don't want to snore in public.
0 0ReportSpamAdd a commentReportPlease help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.CategoriesSpamChild pornography or exploitationProfanity, vulgarity or obscenityCopyright infringementHarassment or threatThreats of suicideOtherAdditional comments(optional) 100 character limitAre you sure you want to delete this comment? var initData = {"partnerId":"54bd59b2-6179-4753-ac3f-009a75d55388","jsUrl":null,"strings":{"lc_shw":"true","lc_dtf":"%M/dd/yyyy %h:mm tt","lc_dtf2":"ddd %h:mm tt","lc_gmt":"-5","lc_erg":"Comments are currently unavailable. Try again later.","lc_det":"Comments are unavailable on this page.","lc_pgf":"{0} of {1}","lc_1ach":"Comment","lc_ach":"Comments","lc_newm":"Newest","lc_oldm":"Oldest","lc_bestm":"Best","lc_worstm":"Worst","lc_mixedm":"Controversial","lc_prv":"Previous page","lc_nxt":"Next page","lc_pageNumTooltip":"Enter a page number, and then press the Enter key","lc_first":"First page","lc_last":"Last page","lc_rpl":"Reply","lc_rbs":"Report","lc_edt":"Edit","lc_del":"Delete","lc_pstthanks":"Thanks for posting to","lc_pstand":"{0} and {1}","lc_seemore":"See more . . . ","lc_seeless":"See less . . .","lc_rpttxt":"Thank you for reporting.","lc_msg2mod":"Send note to moderator . . .","lc_cc0":"Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates the","lc_cc1":"Code of Conduct","lc_cc2":"Please use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.","lc_cat":"Categories","lc_spa":"Spam","lc_che":"Child pornography or exploitation","lc_pro":"Profanity, vulgarity or obscenity","lc_cor":"Copyright infringement","lc_har":"Harassment or threat","lc_usrpic":"Inappropriate user picture","lc_oth":"Other","lc_abc":"Additional comments","lc_opt":"(optional)","lc_atl":"100 character limit","lc_rep":"Report","lc_1hourm":"1 hour ago","lc_1minm":"1 minute ago","lc_recomm":"You recommend this","lc_recomdontm":"You don\u0027t recommend this","lc_voted":"You have voted on this","lc_suicide":"Threats of suicide","lc_joi":"Be the first to comment","lc_shwm":"Show comments","lc_hidem":"Hide comments","lc_hourm":"{0} hours ago","lc_minm":"{0} minutes ago","lc_secm":"{0} seconds ago","lc_add":"Add a comment","lc_dmg":"Are you sure you want to delete this comment?","lc_dok":"Delete","lc_dca":"Cancel","lc_pna":"There\u0027s a problem creating posts right now. Please try again later.","lc_clt":"This discussion is closed. New comments cannot be posted.","lc_fta":"Be the first to comment","lc_fsg":"Be the first to add a comment. To add a comment, please","lc_sgn":"sign-in","lc_lnk":"Read comments","lc_spell_gen_err":"Could not check spelling. Please try again later.","lc_spell_no_mist":"No spelling errors found.","lc_spell_num_mist":"Spell check detected {0} mistake(s).","lc_spell_in_prog":"Spell check in progress...","lc_spell_check":"Check Spelling","lc_post_gen_err":"There's a problem creating posts right now. Please try again later.","lc_post_long":"Post cannot be longer than {0} characters.","lc_post_empty":"Your post cannot be empty.","lc_cmnt_day_max":"You already reached the daily limit for posts today. Please post again tomorrow.","lc_post_prog":"Post in progress...","lc_post":"Post","lc_save":"Save","lc_not_auth":"You are not signed in.","lc_no_suggest_paren":"(No suggestions)","lc_ignore_paren":"(Ignore)","lc_insrt_emot":"Insert Emoticon","lc_cancel":"Cancel","lc_ok":"OK","lc_fmt_quote":"Format as Quote","lc_incr_indnt":"Increase Indent","lc_decr_indnt":"Decrease Indent","lc_bullets":"Bullets","lc_numbering":"Numbering","lc_italic":"Italic (CTRL+I)","lc_bold":"Bold (CTRL+B)","lc_post_dirty":"Edits you have made to your post will be lost.","lc_rte":"Rich Text Editor","lc_ip_banned":"The computer or device you are using is temporarily banned from posting on this site. People or automated programs have recently used this computer or device to create unwanted posts. You may still browse the site and read other people's posts, but you can't create, edit, or delete posts.","lc_chk_msg_spell":"Check message for spelling errors (F7)","lc_post_msg":"Post this message (CTRL+ENTER)","lc_perm_ban":"This Windows Live ID was banned for violating the Code of Conduct. You may still read other people's posts, but you can't create, edit, or delete posts.","lc_temp_ban":"This Windows Live ID is banned from posting on this site until {0}. You may still read other people\u0027s posts, but you can\u0027t create, edit, or delete posts. ","lc_also_pst_fb":"Facebook","lc_also_pst_wl":"Windows Live","lc_also_post_to":"Also post to:","lc_idnt_settings_err":"Could not save your settings. Try again later.","lc_idnt_nick_prohibited":"The nickname you requested is not allowed. It may contain a reserved name or profanity. Please enter another nickname.","lc_idnt_nick_unavail":"The nickname you requested is not available. Please enter another nickname, or select one of these suggestions:","lc_idnt_nick_empty":"Nickname cannot be empty","lc_idnt_nick_max_len":"Nickname cannot be longer than {0} characters","lc_idnt_nick_allowed_chars_err":"You nickname may only contain letters, numbers, hyphens, underscores, and periods. Please enter another nickname.","lc_idnt_lnk_msn_wl":"Link your MSN posts to your profile on Windows Live","lc_idnt_posting_name":"Now when you post with your \u003cstrong\u003ename\u003c/strong\u003e, all of your past and future MSN posts link to your profile on \u003ca href=\"{0}\"\u003eWindows Live\u003c/a\u003e so your friends can read them.","lc_idnt_posting_nick":"If you keep posting with your \u003cstrong\u003enickname\u003c/strong\u003e, your posts aren't connected to your profile on Windows Live.","lc_idnt_name_nxt_psts":"The name you choose appears next to all of your past and future MSN posts.","lc_idnt_post_w_name":"Post with my name","lc_idnt_kp_post_w_nick":"Keep posting with my nickname","lc_idnt_chs_name":"Choose the name that appears next to your posts","lc_idnt_name_lnk_wl":"If you post using your name, your posts link to your profile on \u003ca href=\"{0}\"\u003eWindows Live\u003c/a\u003e so your friends can read them.","lc_idnt_nick_no_wl":"If you create a nickname, your posts are not publicly connected to your profile on Windows Live.","lc_idnt_post_w_nick":"Post with a nickname","lc_idnt_enter_nick":"Enter nickname","lc_idnt_post_w_yr_name":"Post with your name","lc_idnt_mst_use_name":"You must now use your name when you post here.","lc_idnt_note_post_w_name":"Note: When you post using your name, your posts link to your profile on \u003ca href=\"{0}\"\u003eWindows Live\u003c/a\u003e so your friends can read them.","lc_continue":"Continue","lc_idnt_create_nick":"Create a nickname","lc_idnt_nick_nxt_pst":"Your nickname appears next to your posts on MSN.","lc_idnt_nick_allowed_chars":"Nicknames may contain letters, numbers, hyphens, underscores, and periods.","lc_cmnt_unavail":"Commenting is currently not available. Try again later.","lc_loading":"Loading...","lc_signin":"Sign in","lc_signin_create":"Sign in with your Windows Live ID, or create a new one.","lc_spam_msg":"Your post was blocked because it appears similar to spam or automated messages. If this is not the case, revise your post and try again.","lc_wrt_cmnt":"Write a comment...","lc_avtr_pic":"User Picture","lc_edit_cmnt_err":"Could not load comment for editing. Try again later."},"isCommentShow":"true","_p":"","locale":"en-us","forumId":"00120065-0000-0000-0000-000000000000","forumTitle":"MSN Money","boardId":"00000065-02a6-0000-0000-000000000000","boardTitle":"ArticleComments","threadId":"9752e419-54b8-4fc5-91a1-8b962c8dfed4","title":"Article Comment","userId":"b5e44170581cc833","contentId":"0s9sis85uuen3gdanqv9q2h5dgdmvq7g","pageUrl":"http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/JubaksJournal/focus-on-bank-of-china-not-the-fed.aspx?page=2","appUri":"http://social.msn.com/boards","cssBaseUrl":"http://blstc.msn.com/br/scp/css/15/","emoticonBaseUrl":"http://us.social.s-msn.com/s/","responseBridgeUrl":"http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/scp.aspx","cmntSharingOn":true,"cmntSharingNetworks":[{"id":0,"locKey":"lc_fb","tooltipLocKey":"lc_also_pst_fb"},{"id":1,"locKey":"lc_wl","tooltipLocKey":"lc_also_pst_wl"}],"omniAccount":"MSNPORTALSCP","currentPage":1,"totalPages":1,"sortOrder":0,"isAuth":false,"signInUrl":"https://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=11&ct=1292584821&rver=5.5.4177.0&wp=LBI&wreply=http:%2F%2Farticles.moneycentral.msn.com%2FInvesting%2FJubaksJournal%2Ffocus-on-bank-of-china-not-the-fed.aspx%3Fpage%3D2&lc=1033&id=250710","genericAvatarUrl":"http://us.social.s-msn.com/s/images/bluemann.png","settingsCookieDomain":"msn.com"}; scpjs.Comments.init(initData , false, true); /*MSN PrivacyLegalAdvertiseRSSHelpFeedbackSite mapAbout our ads© 2010 Microsoft/*The technology-dominated Nasdaq Composite ($COMPX) climbed 22% in 1997 and then accelerated to a 40% gain in 1998. Stocks rose because the Federal Reserve, rather than acting to let air out of the bubble, was pumping it in.
Money supply, as measured by M2, rose by 8.5% from December 1997 to December 1998, according to data from the Federal Reserve.
And in 1999? The Fed still didn't throttle back -- much. Money supply grew by 6% that year, providing plenty of cash to drive stock prices even higher. The Nasdaq climbed 86% that year.
In 1998 and 1999, studiously bearish investors questioned stock market valuations and called the run-up in stocks unsustainable. They argued that what was then called the "Greenspan put," a virtual guarantee from the Fed that it would pump money into the markets if any crisis threatened the markets, was encouraging reckless investing in stocks with wildly unrealistic valuations.
They were right, of course. Eventually. But if you shorted on that wisdom in 1998 or 1999, you got killed. The bottom didn't fall out of stocks until 2000. The Nasdaq fell 39% in 2000, an additional 21% in 2001 and an additional 32% in 2002. Investors who had been arguing that stocks were overvalued for years were totally vindicated, although many of them had pulled out of the market to lick their wounds. (As John Maynard Keynes put it, "Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent.")
These bears had fought the Fed, and the Fed won. Which illustrated aptly the mantra's cynical view of the financial world: You can be oh, so right, and the Fed oh, so wrong, and for much of the time all your superior knowledge, wisdom and smarts don't matter. The Fed, even if it's dead wrong, will win, because it's got the trillions to back up its point of view.
Remember this history as we look at the present. How wrong is the Bank of China? I think there's a good chance that the People's Bank of China is going to turn out to be disastrously wrong about how to run China's economy.
The country's central bank has apparently decided that it's OK to let bank lending run wild, to rely on price controls to fight inflation, to keep the yuan cheap versus the dollar and to discourage saving by keeping deposit rates well below the rate of inflation. The bank's monetary policy risks letting inflation get so far out of control that there won't be any way to gently step on the brake.
And that wouldn't be good. Even thinking about it as an investor makes me want to run for the hills.
But not yet, my mantra says. While the People's Bank may be wrong, its moves will still move the markets. And it would be foolish to bet against the People's Bank.
For a while at least. What, China worry? China's government is apparently much less worried about inflation than are overseas investors and market analysts.
On Dec. 14, in the first official statement after the weekend meeting of the Central Economic Work Conference, Zhang Ping, the head of the National Development and Reform Commission, told state television that Beijing plans to set a 4% target for consumer price inflation next year, up from 3% in 2010.
And the government doesn't seem to be worried at all that inflation, at 5.1% in November, is running way above its targets for 2010 and 2011.
Reports out of Beijing suggest the government will set the 2011 quota for new bank lending at 7.5 trillion yuan, about $1.1 trillion. That's the same quota that the government set for 2010 and that banks will almost certainly exceed by the end of this month. 2010 was supposed to be the year that China reined in bank lending from the stunning doubling in new loans in 2009 from 2008 in response to the global financial crisis. Instead, once you add in off-balance-sheet lending, the total for 2010 will be essentially unchanged from 2009. And the new target will continue that pace.
The effects have been huge. The money supply has climbed by 50% in the last two years. Even for a country growing as fast as China, that's wildly inflationary.
Continued: Don't fight the inflationMore from MSN Money and MoneyShow.com
1 | 2 | next >
Check out Jim's top stocks for the next 12 months.
Read how to invest with Jubak's showcase portfolio.
Follow the long-term portfolio from Jim's book "The Jubak Picks."
See Jim's new portfolio to help navigate the treacherous interest-rate environment.
Jim..Jim.. Jim (Jubak)
Once again my head slammed on my desk from the absolute boredom of your articles. C'mon buddy--I believe your heart is in the right place--trying to guide us with our investments. But, Jim--You can spice it up once in awhile. You know--get out of the missionary position and mix it up a little.
Last week you wrote a piece--- that for once--didn't immediately start sleep mode--it was on Spain and silver. You seemed to have fun. I could imagine your little fingers gliding across the keys as if you were playing a grand piano. Your viewers were applauding you, Jim. That article was, well uh, interesting!
Jimmy, for the new year do us a favor; Think outside of the cubicle.
P.S.
Thanks for the invite to meet you at The Money show. But, I still have articles of yours to put me to sleep and I don't want to snore in public.
Read Full Article »