The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is better than its reviews but still very disappointing. Its 545-page report represents a powerful, fact-filled indictment of the financial system and the leading players and institutions that produced the national catastrophe. But there is one glaring omission—the massive fraud that occurred on Wall Street.
When the Democratic Party fails to use government’s extensive powers to reverse economic disorder, it must be the end of the line for the governing ideology inherited from Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson.
The payroll tax cut sounds attractive, but the consequences could prove deadly for the federal government's most popular program.
Some leading economists and former regulators (not to mention citizens at large) think fraud is a central explanation for what went wrong. The commission’s conclusions skip lightly over the matter—both civil fraud and go-to-jail criminal fraud.
In this regard, the FCIC report resembles a giant haystack sprinkled with sharp needles. Somewhere in the FCIC’s daunting details are explosive revelations. But can citizens find or understand them? Not very likely; the six Democratic commissioners who produced the final report don’t mention any needles or provide any clues about how to find them. Instead, the commission blandly states that it has referred “potential violations” to “appropriate authorities.” But it won’t say how many cases were passed along to prosecutors or whether they involve big-name bankers or low-level clerks forging mortgage documents.
“Our job is to bring out the facts. It is the prosecutor’s job to prosecute the facts,” commission chair Phil Angelides insisted when I badgered him on this point. With some outside prompting from bloggers and other informed observers, I was able to locate a couple of needles amid the voluminous text. They implicate some of the best names on Wall Street. But for whatever reasons, the commission Democrats framed their findings in broadly critical accusations about the financial industry, government regulators, the Federal Reserve and others whose failures caused the eventual collapse. “We conclude this financial crisis was avoidable,” the commissioners declare. The FCIC’s facts confirm that judgment. Read the report or graze the 1,200 documents posted on the FCIC website (fcic.gov). You will doubtless come away dizzy but enlightened and angry.
For instance, I choked on this language: “As a nation, we must also accept responsibility for what we permitted to occur. Collectively, but certainly not unanimously, we acquiesced to or embraced a system that…gave rise to our present predicament.” That sounds like the same self-serving baloney the establishment can be counted on to deploy to avoid blame.
If everyone is to blame, then no one can be blamed. This reminds me of when the Iraq War went bad, and the Bush administration couldn’t find the WMDs. People who had led cheers for war started saying, “Well, we were all fooled, weren’t we?” No, we were not. Congress and the Obama administration took a similar tack on the financial crisis. It would be wrong and vengeful, they said, to point fingers at major miscreants. In this complacent milieu, referring cases to the Justice Department is not exactly comforting. Angry citizens want to know why more people didn’t go to jail.
For one example of the FCIC’s buried treasures, turn to page 165 and read about the true meaning of “due diligence.” In 2006–07, an auditing firm, Clayton Holdings, was hired to examine some 900,000 mortgages. It found that 255,000 (28 percent) were flawed and should not have been packaged as mortgage-backed securities. Clayton’s president delicately described the high deficiency rate as “a quality control issue.” But the banks went ahead and included nearly 100,000 of the dubious loans in new securities anyway, without informing the buyers. “They knew a significant percentage of the sampled loans did not meet their own underwriting standards or those of the originators,” the FCIC concluded. “Nonetheless, they sold those securities to investors. The Commission’s review of many prospectuses provided to investors found that this critical information was not disclosed.”
This smells like old-fashioned investor fraud. The biggest players were Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and three leading European banks. The FCIC observed that this sleight-of-hand occurred when the housing market began to collapse and banks were eager to dump their rotten assets. It has provided a wealth of material evidence for the growing flood of investor lawsuits. Even the Federal Reserve is suing financiers to recover on the bad assets it was sold.
Shouldn’t someone go to jail? Determining criminal intent is always difficult. Corporate law is a thicket of exemptions and clever distinctions designed to shield the big boys at the top. If the feds got serious, they would apply the same techniques used against Mafia dons. First “squeeze” lesser players down below—traders, salesmen, accountants—then “turn” them into government witnesses. Build a chain of evidence against those who knew the score and gave the orders. What did the titans know and when did they know it?
If President Obama wanted to address the random rage accumulating around the country, this could be his issue (Republicans are freaked out by any suggestion that capitalists did anything wrong). Instead of ignoring the FCIC report, the president should embrace its content and demand an aggressive follow-up by federal prosecutors and regulatory agencies.
The issue at stake here is far more threatening than smug elites seem to understand. Nothing erodes the authority and legitimacy of government more severely than a spreading awareness of unequal justice. The feds send hapless drug mules to prison for twenty years. For billion-dollar swindles, they won’t even call a grand jury. This corrosive contradiction can become a national disease. Americans are learning from these events—another investigation with shocking evidence, but not much happens afterward. This will sound farfetched, I know, but this is a road that leads eventually to Cairo.
If you like this article, consider making a donation.
Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.
'It is necessary to point out that although the stealth Neoliberal president has been taking baby steps out of the closet, he would always stay by the entrance: as long as there is no popular anger or pressure against his Neoliberal policies, he would stay on the outside; at the first signs of a threatening pressure from the grassroots, however, he would crawl back inside the closet, and begin preaching populism or uttering ineffectual, benign corporate-bashing rhetoric. This is his mission and his political forte "“ a master demagogue. And this is why the politico-economic establishment promoted him to presidency as they found him the most serviceable presidential candidate. None of his presidential rivals could have served the tycoons of the finance world and the kings of Wall Street as well as he has.'
Escalating Reaganomics Inside Obamanomics By ISMAEL HOSSEIN-ZADEH Counterpunch - 01/28/11
Too much regulation Mr. President is the take away from FCIC? All righty then. Explains your decision on extending the Bush Tax Cuts right after hearing from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.
Now - explain to me why we spent 5 times more on the Clinton - Lewinsky Blowjob investigation compared to the financial crisis, and 20 times more on the Blowjob than your debt commission?????
-and the band played on while the Titanic took on water-
Send the banksters to jail!
Nowadays pundits blame our economic meltdown on poor Blacks who bought more house than they could afford and public-sector unions that have pensions and health plans. That's the narrative--and Republicans as well as Obama and the Democrats don't really object to this slander. The facts is that fraudulent and criminal Wall Street firms caused our economy to collapse during the housing bubble. Why fraudulent and criminal? Simply stated, Wall St. sold worthless crap as gold--that's to say they bundled mortgages of dubious value and sold them, with the connivance of the rating agencies, as AAA-rated securities. These they sold the world over to deceived investors. When this ponzi scheme ended, the housing market collapsed and folks ended up in the poorhouse--except the Wall street folks who made fortunes with taxpayers footing the bill!
Greider's point is well taken--heads should roll. Sadly, Obama is a Mubarak type ruler--dishonest, corrupt and thuggish when you come down to it--not at all different from Bush 1 and 2 and Clinton.
"Our job is to bring out the facts. It is the prosecutor's job to prosecute the facts," commission chair Phil Angelides insisted when I badgered him on this point.
So no justice for the Talibankers.
Americans are held hostage by their own government again.
larry inscore, I'm with you, what ever happened to the 60's sit-ins? No money to travel, so the marches would have to be in my state, I could handle that too. How does one go about organizing something?
90% of everything I read in TN supports an organized march, boycott, uprising, sit-ins, etc. Corruption is rampant: The legal and acctg. professions; brokers and investment advisors; the FDA, SEC, and on and on. The med profession is controlled by the pharm. ind. as are the elected officials.What passes for pol. debate is farcial. TN delivers blunt criticism that should arouse action. I'm 78, over the hill. This country is going down the drain;unfortunately, without a fight.
William. Remember? I told you not to trust Angelides.
--Peter Byrne
Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC
Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana
Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York
North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania
Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah
Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Read Full Article »
