Following the money in banking, economics and Washington
Good news! Central bankers just got another reason to put off raising interest rates.
A study by researchers at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development says international rules raising bank capital levels will slow economic growth only a bit in coming years, by slightly raising borrowing costs.
Tempted?
The report counters the banking lobby's reflexive claim that any rules imposed on bankers threaten to kneecap economic growth.
But by now we have all learned you can't tiptoe too carefully around the bankers, after all they have done for us. So the report sketches out how policymakers could mitigate even the modest effect of the new rules -- by running their favorite play, holding down short-term interest rates.
The findings are in a paper released Thursday by Patrick Slovik and Boris Cournède, who are economists in the OECD Economics Department. The release comes as policy wonks descend on Paris for the G20 meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors Friday and Saturday.
The researchers say implementing the Basel III bank capital rules should cut gross domestic product growth in the United States, Europe and Japan by between 5 and 15 basis points, or hundredths of a percentage point, annually by 2015. That slowdown will come about as banks boost their lending spreads by 15 basis points or so, Slovik and Cournede say, to offset the profit-damping impact of lower leverage.
Rising bank capital levels will lead to a bigger increase in lending spreads in the United States than in Europe or Japan, the OECD paper says, because U.S. banks tend toward riskier balance sheets. But the impact on the U.S. economy is muted because banks here account for just a quarter of credit creation – just a third of the level in the other rich regions.
In any case, slightly higher borrowing costs seem like a fairly modest price to pay for hopefully fending off another global banking meltdown, even if it does stand to crimp profit growth at JPMorgan (JPM) and Goldman Sachs (GS), boo hoo.
But of course policymakers are sensitive to the criticism that they risk short-circuiting a weak recovery by keeping too tight a rein on the banks, which after all remind us at every turn that their lending lies at the heart of the global economy.
So how might the Ben Bernankes of the world ease the bankers' pain? By leaning on interest rates, assuming they ever get above zero during the next decade in the first place.
"To the extent that monetary policy will no longer be constrained by the zero lower bound, the Basel III impact on economic output could be offset by a reduction (or delayed increase) in monetary policy rates by about 30 to 80 basis points," the report says.
Of course, for now central bankers are keeping rates near zero because they know how weak the recovery is and see little risk of rising prices feeding through to higher wage demands.
But down the road they have other motivations to keep rates low, including the sticker shock that could hit the U.S. budget when higher interest rates push up federal borrowing costs. There is every indication they will continue playing the low rates card until the screaming about inflation goes off the decibel chart.
And with today's paper, you can add keeping the bankers happy – always an important consideration – to the list of reasons rates may stay lower longer than you think.
Also on Fortune.com:
Basel III allow leverage factor maximum 33... Every day banks bet 33 times their own capital... If their new own capital is doubled, they will bet 66 times their old own capital, every day... For my own I never bet more that 0,5 times my own capital... And I risk to loose 50% of my own capital, not 33 times my own capital... Private banks created 1 quadrillion $ liquidities, from nothing (Google "quadrillion $ derivatives") QE2 is only 0,0006 quadrillion $ big... Banksters are dangerous...
hahahahahahahaha china is terrible!!!!!!!
So this is what the world has come to : All decisions are based upon what makes bankers happy. Never mind this is a group whose decisions resulted in the most spectacular failure of the century, somehow their opinions are considered more valuable than anyone else's. Yes, let us decide our future based upon the opinions of the worst decision makers.
How about letting the people who tout the free market pay interest rates set by (GASP!) the free market ? Of course many if not most of the banks would fail. But the free market economics our dear banking leaders tout says that this kind of creative destruction is necessary for growth, and we certainly need growth. For once, I actually agree with them, if only it is actually applied to them.
It is time for Wall Street to drink their own Kool-Aid or stop marketing it. We've loaned the banking sector 9 Trillion dollars, and had little growth. Loan the same amount to small business, at the same rate, and I guarantee improved job creation and growth, not just higher asset prices which are certain to fall if, nay, when Bernake money pump becomes too expensive to run.
Screen name (Select one with 3-12 characters; Numbers and letters only)
Enter your e-mail address below and we will send you an e-mail with a link and code to reset your password.
Already have the reset code?
Reset code
New password
Password
Forgot password?
Not a member yet?
Screen name
Password
Type what you see in the grey box
CNNMoney will use the information you submit in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. By clicking on "sign up" you agree with CNNMoney's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and consent to the collection, storage and use of this information in the U.S. subject to U.S. laws and regulations. (learn more)
This service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Thanks!
Please check your e-mail and click the link to confirm your membership. Then, you'll be ready to participate in all activities and conversations on our site.
Go to your Profile page
Be the first to know when there is breaking financial news with timely alerts delivered straight to your inbox.
Fortune's Philip Elmer-DeWitt brings you Mac news from outside the reality distortion field.
Fortune columnist Anne Fisher answers your career-related questions.
Money Magazine's Walter Updegrave answers readers' toughest financial questions.
Fortune managing editor Andy Serwer keeps tabs on Wall Street
CNN's Gerri Willis gives tips and tools for saving more and spending wisely.
A complete roundup of each day's trading activity.
Read Full Article »