By Robert Higgs Monday February 21, 2011 at 11:00:24 AM PST
To answer the question I’ve posed, consider the following table from the National Income and Product Accounts, accessed yesterday at the Bureau of Economic Analysis website.
National Income and Product Accounts Table Table 1.1.6. Real Gross Domestic Product, Chained Dollars [Billions of chained (2005) dollars]According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recession began in December 2007, so we can take 2007 as the last pre-recession year for purposes of annual comparison.
Between 2007 and 2010, real GDP fell slightly (2.6 percent) in 2009, then recovered fully in 2010, reaching a new high (but only slightly above the figure for 2007, too small an increase to take seriously).
Examining the major components of GDP, we find that personal consumption expenditures fell in 2008 and 2009, reaching a level 1.5 percent lower in the latter year. Consumption then increased in 2010, more than recovering its loss during the previous two years. In 2010, it stood three-tenths of 1 percent higher than in 2007–again, probably too small a gain to consider a significant difference, in view of the likely measurement error.
So, according to the official data, the recession has come and gone in so far as it has left its mark on real GDP and real consumption spending.
Gross private domestic investment reached a peak in 2007, then fell during each of the following years, reaching a level 30 percent lower in 2009. Although it increased by 17 percent in 2010, it remained 18 percent below its 2007 peak.
Chronically negative net exports actually took a substantially smaller chunk of the real GDP in 2010 than they had in 2007.
Finally, real government expenditures rose relentlessly, before, during, and after the contraction. In 2010, they stood 5.6 percent higher than in 2007. Remember, we are examining real (i.e., inflation adjusted) figures here. Obviously, government made no contribution to falling GDP during the contraction, a fact in which all Keynesians take great pride. However, because government spending increased while other components of GDP (except net exports) either fell or held their own, the government’s share of GDP rose between 2007 and 2010, from 19.2 percent in 2007 to 20.5 percent in 2010 (these percentages I’ve calculated from a different table because chained price-level adjustments, which underlie Table 1.1.6, make such intertemporal comparisons of proportions inaccurate). That government has increased its share of GDP may be good news for Keynesians, but it’s bad news for the long-run performance of the economy.
The most important lessons to draw from the preceding information are (1) that the recession has been associated with a sharp drop in private investment expenditure, and the recovery to date, though already complete in regard to private consumption and total GDP, remains far from complete for investment spending; and (2) government spending has forged ahead, in good weather and bad, thereby increasing its share of total GDP.
To repeat my question: What’s holding back the recovery? My answer: the failure of private investment to recover fully. Let us hear no more about the allegedly pressing need for the government to stimulate consumer spending. Moreover, let us insist that the relentless growth of government spending–not only the kind represented in the National Income and Product Accounts, but also the massive transfer payments–must be stopped. For the government to continue insisting that it must stimulate the economy in the short run, however harmful such government spending might be in the long run, is a recipe for ruin.
Categories: Budget and Tax Policy, Economics, Politics, The State
1 Comment(s)Dr. Higgs,
Has the trade deficit increased since the recession began? How about consumer debt compared to savings? Do these factors play a key role in determining when there will be a recovery or not? My impression is that the trade deficit is causing inflation in China and India, and soon that inflation could come over here and decrease the trade deficit.
Ken Camp | Feb 21, 2011 | Reply
1 Trackback(s) Feb 22, 2011: from Some Links Post a CommentName (required)
E-mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
« Previous Post YouTube RSS Also Available Free Email Updates Authors Alvaro Vargas Llosa (1)Anthony Gregory (192)Art Carden (57)Carl Close (37)David Beito (93)David Theroux (131)Edward Lopez (4)Emily Skarbek (5)Gabriel Gasave (2)James A. Montanye (1)James L. Payne (5)Jeffrey Rogers Hummel (1)Jonathan Bean (80)Josh Kaplan (2)Karen Kwiatkowski (9)Lindsay Boyd (10)Mary Theroux (102)Melancton Smith (15)Paul Theroux (1)Peter Klein (55)Randall Holcombe (109)Robert Higgs (194)Roland de Beque (1)Wendy Honett (11)William Shughart (41)William Watkins (6) New Books
Free Shipping On Orders Over $60! (Within U.S.A.)
SECURING CIVIL RIGHTS: Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms By Stephen P. Halbrook THE NEW HOLY WARS: Economic Religion vs. Environmental Religion in Contemporary America By Robert H. Nelson HOUSING AMERICA: Building Out of a Crisis Edited by Randall G. Holcombe, Benjamin PowellRACE AND LIBERTY IN AMERICA: The Essential Reader Edited by Jonathan J. Bean
THE DECLINE OF AMERICAN LIBERALISM By Arthur A. Ekirch, Jr.
PARTITIONING FOR PEACE: An Exit Strategy for Iraq By Ivan Eland
DEPRESSION, WAR, AND COLD WAR: Challenging the Myths of Conflict and Prosperity By Robert Higgs
RECARVING RUSHMORE: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty By Ivan Eland
THE FOUNDERS’ SECOND AMENDMENT: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms By Stephen P. Halbrook
THE CHE GUEVARA MYTH: And the Future of Liberty By Alvaro Vargas Llosa
More Books
Categories Select Category Afghanistan Africa Agriculture American History Art Audio Austrian School of economics Bailouts Books Budget and Tax Policy Business California Canada Charity China Civil Liberties Civil Society Conservatism Constitution Corporatism Corruption Criminal Justice Culture Defense Disaster Management Drugs Economics Education Elections Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Europe Family Fascism Federal Reserve Food Free Market Georgia Germany Global Warming Government subsidies Great Depression Gun Control Healthcare Housing Humor Immigration Imperialism Inflation Insurance Integrity Intellectual Property Iran Iraq Japan Labor Land use Latin America Law Liberalism Liberty Media Mercantilism Middle East Military Money and Banking Monopoly and Antitrust Morality Nanny State Nationalization Natural Law Nuclear Weapons Pakistan Peace Personal Liberty Philosophy Police Politics Poverty Power Presidential Power Price control Privacy Privatization Propaganda Property Rights Racism Regulation Religion Russia Science Social Security Socialism Sports Surveillance Taxation Technology Terrorism The State Torture Trade Transparency Transportation Uncategorized Unemployment United Nations Upcoming Events Urban Issues Utilitarianism Video Read Full Article »