Since the time of the Founding Fathers, U.S. leaders have believed in the concept of American exceptionalism, that the U.S. is a special country with a special mission. It is a notion that continues to this day. And when it comes to the threat its deteriorating national finances present to the world economy, the U.S. is truly exceptional. That danger was finally made clear by Standard & Poor's on Monday, which changed the outlook on its U.S. sovereign rating to negative "“ in other words, the S&P is threatening to downgrade the U.S. from its traditional triple-A status. The implications of this move are incredibly far-reaching. No, it doesn't mean the U.S. in on the verge of a debt crisis. But it does mean the world can't act like an elephant isn't in the room. We've seen a debt crisis grip Europe and worries mount over the financial state of Japan. Those problems are scary enough. But when it comes to terrifying debt-crisis scenarios, the U.S. stands in a universe all its own.
That's not because the U.S. debt burden is the biggest "“ Japan's government debt is more than twice as large, relative to its GDP "“ but because of the exceptional role the U.S. plays in the global economy. A debt crisis in Portugal could send ripples of uncertainty through world financial markets, and if a larger country like Spain fell into crisis, those ripples could prove mighty destabilizing. But U.S. debt runs the risk of crashing the entire operating system of the global economy. Here's what I mean:
Not only is the U.S. the world's largest economy "“ by far "“ but it also dominates the global monetary system. In many respects, the entire architecture of global finance is built upon the U.S. economy. Its capital markets are the most liquid. The dollar is the world's No. 1 reserve currency and the primary one used in foreign exchange transactions and trade. Countries like China and Japan have their national wealth stored to a great degree in U.S. debt. When investors get nervous, they rush to U.S. dollar"“based assets, and especially U.S. debt. The perception has always been that the U.S. is the ultimate safe haven. Even as its financial condition sickens, that perception remains. Despite a dramatic increase in U.S. deficits and debt in recent years, the country has still been able to borrow at exceptionally low rates. In other words, the U.S. has benefited tremendously from its economic exceptionalism.
Now let's speculate on what would happen if that perception fundamentally changed. U.S. Treasury securities would be seen as riskier and would therefore become less attractive. Interest rates would rise in the U.S. as a result, not only making it harder for the government to finance budget deficits and debt, but also raising borrowing costs across the economy, slowing investment and consumption. The U.S. dollar would weaken, undermining the value of currency reserves around the world and speeding us along to the day when the dollar is no longer the world's premier currency. All that would be destabilizing enough. It would likely mean slower growth in the world's largest economy, deteriorating living standards for Americans, and thus slower growth for the entire world economy.
But the bigger problem would be, What would take America's place? The U.S. is the standard by which risk is assessed in financial markets. If the U.S. isn't a safe haven, then what is? And what country's currency and capital markets are deep enough to accommodate the world's wealth if America's can't? Here's how Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive at PIMCO, put it on a blog post on the Financial Times website on Tuesday:
The world looks to America for a range of "global public goods" "” including the reserve currency, the deepest and most liquid government debt markets, and the "risk free" standard. With no other country able and willing to step into this role, the result would be global efficiency losses and a higher risk of economic and financial fragmentation"¦The time has come for the US (and other advanced economies) to take better control of its fiscal destiny"”for the sake of American society and for the well being of the global economy.
Even though America's exceptional role in the world economy makes its debt situation exceptionally dangerous, that role also apparently gives the U.S. exceptional protection as well. In theory, the S&P warning is a signal that the U.S. is not exceptional, that if it doesn't get its financial house in order, it will face downgrades just like those of Greece, Spain and Japan. But the markets told us something very different. Treasurys weakened immediately after the announcement, a sign that investors were selling them, but then quickly recovered their strength. What's that, you say? Yes, rather than scaring investors away from U.S. debt, investors actually bought U.S. debt after the S&P warning. And the reaction from some major U.S. bondholders showed little concern about America's financial standing. "We continue to believe that U.S. Treasurys are an attractive product for us," Japanese Finance Minister Yoshihiko Noda told reporters.
Sound crazy? Not really. The world has a lot at stake in the continued stability of the American economy, and thus every incentive to keep U.S. debt from roiling the world economy. This gets us back to the exceptional position of the U.S. in world finance. With nothing to replace the U.S., the country is getting exceptional treatment from the global economy.
It seems to me that U.S. policymakers have been banking (perhaps subconsciously) on this very outcome "“ that the U.S. is simply too exceptional to face dangers other nations could never avoid. They've been acting this way. The U.S. is the only heavily indebted developed economy that doesn't have a credible plan to control deficits and debt. (Japan doesn't either, but because of the need to soften the blow from last month's devastating earthquake, we'll give Tokyo a pass here.) In other words, the U.S. is counting on being like AIG or GM and acting as if it is too big to fail.
Is that true? American exceptionalism will give Washington an exceptional opportunity to fix its financial mess without suffering the consequences of other debt-heavy nations. But what if the U.S. fails to grasp the opportunity? Can the U.S. and the world economy escape the fallout? Now that would be truly exceptional.
One should not and must not take things for granted. Complacency is detrimental to the leading economy in the world. Neither should one fare on the auspices of other people alone without one's own efforts. Only by increasing her economic efficiency and nursing her economy back to full health without the current government stimuli that are bordering a socialist or planned economy can USA regain her past robust economic strength. Furthermore, she must also give full effect to the internationally agreed financial regulatory system and not just do lip service to ensure that the 2008 financial tsunami is really history. The fundamental change needed to make sure that the capitalistic or market economy will provide a level and fair playing field for all consumers is not to let greed dictate policy. In short, it is nothing less than the total revolution of the dark side of human nature and elevation of our social morality to a higher and more compassionate state - by education as well as by regulations if that need be the case!
Joseph K.H. Cheng ( April 19, 2011 )
The only risk to the U.S. dollar is inflation, which the Fed has controlled for 40 years with interest rate control. The U.S. debt is not a realistic problem. The government, being Monetarily Sovereign, does not need to borrow.
The debt growth could end tomorrow, if the government simply stopped creating T-securities. Why would a government with the unlimited ability to create dollars, need to borrow those dollars?
Michael, please, please try to learn and understand Monetary Sovereignty.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Rodger, please try to understand the dangers of unlimited money creation.
Our government mimics its people. My generation, the baby boomers, lived for today, leveraged their earnings by going in debt and consumed like drunken sailors. http://goo.gl/91CnH
If we are going to stay strong as a nation this must change. At the end of World War II we were the last country standing and consuming. This is no longer the case. Other countries are gaining strength. This will put more pressure on the worlds resources.
Our politicians must get the message that we must change. This does not mean that we must make draconian cuts to social programs as suggested by some conservatives. It does mean we need to be responsible. We need to consume less and invest more. We must reduce the expenditures of the federal government, raise the taxes of the wealthy and make our markets free again. Right now they are not free.
In China the central government controls the economy. In this country, our economy is controlled more and more by oligopolies controlling large industries. These oligopolies control our politicians by egregious campaign contributions. This is more lethal because the public still believes we have free markets, http://goo.gl/7yH0A
Again, another column on S&P's downgrading of our sovereign rating. The second in two days, and they're both the same garbage. I used to read Time and get a little bit of background and analysis on a story. Now it's the same crap, different author.
S&P couldn't rate a casino correctly, let alone a country. They're just as guilty as the banks and AIG were in the financial crisis. The real news here shouldn't be about an S&P rating, it should be about the fact that S&P is still in business.
The concept of 'American exceptionalism' is the relic of a bye gone era and unless the present crisis is not tackled efficiently, 'the world financial melt down' will start rolling!!!
Get e-mail updates from TIME's The Curious Capitalist in your inbox and never miss a day.
The Curious Capitalist Favorite Links Barry Ritholtz Calculated Risk Ezra Klein John Gapper Justin Fox Marginal Revolution Mark Thoma Market Observation More Money Paul Krugman Planet Money Street Sweep Swampland adFactory.getCmAd(300, 250, "global", "tout").write(); adFactory.getCmAd(300, 100, "article", "tout").write(); ArchiveApril 2011SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 More News from Our Partners CNN Welcome to the era of 'extreme energy' 'Portal 2' is a dark, humorous joy (no lie!) Apple to Samsung: Stop stealing our ideas Huffington Post Supreme Court Casts Doubt On States' Global Warming Suit Obama Administration Looks To Ease Pain Of Medicare Cuts Gaddafi? Kadhafi? Arabic Names Spell Trouble For Banks DailyFinance.com The Tax Deadline Looms: Advice for Last-Minute Filers The Cost of Contraception: Would You Buy Birth Control Pills on Craigslist? Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz: Reinvented and Just the Same Rotten Tomato Five Favorite Films with Morgan Spurlock RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: The King's Speech and Rabbit Hole Box Office Guru Wrapup: Rio Debuts On Top Life Artwork Under Attack! History of the Birther Movement The Beetle: From Hitler to Hippies More on TIME.com » Collective Backlash: Behold the Ayn Rand Congress Egyptian Justice: What to Do About the Mubaraks? 'Brideorexia': Does Kate Have Wedding-Diet Stress? Quotes of the Day » "This is a bridge too far." JAN BREWER, Arizona governor, vetoing her legislature's "birther bill"; the author says it wasn't aimed at President Obama — who has faced discredited allegations that he wasn't born in the U.S. — but at "maintaining the integrity of the Constitution" More Quotes » var ad = adFactory.getAd(88, 31); ad.setPosition(13) ad.write(); Today in Pictures » What Remains Stay Connected with TIME.com Learn More » Subscribe to RSS Feeds Sign Up for Newsletters Add TIME Widgets Read TIME Mobile on Your Phone Become a Fan of TIME Get TIME Twitter Updates adFactory.getCmAd(115, 42, "homepage", "tout").write(); © 2011 Time Inc. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | RSS | Newsletter | TIME For Kids | LIFE.com Subscribe | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Media Kit | Reprints & Permissions | Opinion Leaders Panel | Help | Site Map TiiAdTrackRevSci(); function tiQuantcast() { } _qoptions={ qacct:"p-5dyPa639IrgIw", labels:tiQuantcast() } var KRUXSetup = { "pubid": "a0aa309c-d0ef-4b32-9684-99ab0888e402", "site":"Time.com", "section":(typeof(s_time.prop16)=="undefined") ? "" : s_time.prop16, "sub_section":(typeof(s_time.prop11)=="undefined") ? "" : s_time.prop11, "userData": { "content_type":(typeof(s_time.prop7)=="undefined") ? "" : s_time.prop7 } }; KRUX.SuperTag.invisibleTags(); Powered by WordPress.com VIP var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10268691-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} // /* a.like').click( function(e) { e.preventDefault(); jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin').remove(); jQuery.post( 'http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', { 'action': 'wpl_record_stat', 'stat_name': 'loggedout_like_click' } ); var tenMins = new Date(); tenMins.setTime( tenMins.getTime() + 600000 ); document.cookie = 'wpl_rand=9e71da28d7; expires=' + tenMins.toGMTString() + '; domain=wordpress.com; path=/;'; jQuery('#wpl-count').after( '\ \ \Just one more step to like this post:
\ Username \ Password \ \ \ \Not a member yet? Sign up with WordPress.com
\ \ \ '); jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin').hide().slideDown('fast'); } ); jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin input.input').live( 'focus', function() { jQuery(this).prev().hide(); }).live( 'blur', function() { if ( jQuery(this).val() == '' ) jQuery(this).prev().show(); }); jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin input#wp-submit').live( 'click', function(e) { e.preventDefault(); jQuery.post( 'http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', { 'action': 'wpl_record_stat', 'stat_name': 'loggedout_login_submit' }, function() { jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin form').submit(); } ); }); jQuery('#wpl-mustlogin a#wpl-signup-link').live( 'click', function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var link = jQuery(this).attr('href'); jQuery.post( 'http://timecuriouscapitalist.wordpress.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', { 'action': 'wpl_record_stat', 'stat_name': 'loggedout_signup_click' }, function() { location.href = link; } ); }); }); /* ]]> */ _qoptions={qacct:'p-18-mFEk4J448M',labels:'language.en,type.wpcom,vip.timecuriouscapitalist'}; var _sf_async_config={uid:3088,domain:"curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com",pingServer:"ptimeinc.chartbeat.net"}; _sf_async_config.authors = 'Michael Schuman'; _sf_async_config.sections = 'budget deficits, currencies, dollar, fiscal policy, sovereign debt, Uncategorized'; _sf_async_config.path = '/2011/04/19/what-america%e2%80%99s-debt-problem-means-for-the-global-economy/'; (function(){ function loadChartbeat() { window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime(); var e = document.createElement('script'); e.setAttribute('language', 'javascript'); e.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript'); e.setAttribute('src', (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://s3.amazonaws.com/" : "http://") + "static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat.js"); document.body.appendChild(e); } var oldonload = window.onload; window.onload = (typeof window.onload != 'function') ? loadChartbeat : function() { oldonload(); loadChartbeat(); }; })(); /* */ try{COMSCORE.beacon({c1:2,c2:7518284});}catch(e){} st_go({'blog':'5320466','v':'wpcom','user_id':'0','post':'13818','subd':'timecuriouscapitalist'}); function st_vt() {var x=document.createElement("img");x.src="http://stats.wordpress.com/g.gif?blog=5320466&v=wpcomvt&user_id=0&post=13818&subd=timecuriouscapitalist&rand="+Math.random();} ex_go({'crypt':'UE40eW5QN0p8M2Y/RE1BNmNJfGhxNCVxUDExYmtib2E/SzdEJm0lUEtXQmxPVWJjOFR8bW8rLEE3ZlJbLDVnd1NPU0ZnN1VxOTJ+UDRHOVE1cUxtS1srZ2E2NW89WStSbHg9NnBsW19xQlJ0WE5ReS1BPzI2SCZPeVhUUkF3UGNrUm8lb1RlczhjQVhHZFRSV0g9eWUyfGRDcU5jXU0uXTcwck8vK25sU2srZVM0WExzMzFKN0RmZm40Rlc3XXlNW3xRNUhHP1BBfk9FTCxWZnR1Njg3RVlCVVYwcHc='}); addLoadEvent(function(){linktracker_init('5320466',13818);});Not a member yet? Sign up with WordPress.com
Read Full Article »