Timothy Geithner: Captain Oblivious

Share

View Archives Recent Posts Captain Obvious (S&P) vs. Captain Oblivious (Tim Geithner) Canada's Corporate Tax Cut Study: Jobs don't follow Paul Ryan's Budget Arithmetic Makes no Sense Treasury's Titillation over TARP and budget increase More Spin and Geithner Gobbledygook Main | Canada's Corporate Tax Cut Study: Jobs don't follow » MondayApr182011 Captain Obvious (S&P) vs. Captain Oblivious (Tim Geithner) Monday, April 18, 2011 at 12:07PM

Last week, President Obama driveled on about nothing of consequence in his budget speech. Yeah, he said he’d push to roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and close some off-shore corporate tax loopholes, but he’s said both (many times) before and neither happened, so in terms of revenue enhancement, it’s a non-starter.

Today, S&P – that beacon of toxic asset rating foresight (which has yet to be slapped with any monetary accountability for its collusive role in bringing down our economy) came to the astonishing conclusion that the United States has a debt problem, and tagged the country with a 'negative watch' label. The S&P report proceeded to highlight fiscal spending issues, related political debating, and our ridiculously high debt vs. GDP percentage, which is only a few points below 100, as points of main contention. It paid minor lip service to the ‘financial crisis’ as being a factor. It surprisingly (not) shied away from blaming ongoing and potentially further devastating fallout from the overleveraged mortgage related assets still clogging the books of the Fed, housing agencies and financial firms as the banking system maintains the appearance of solvency only through federally supported accounting gimmickry and an exceedingly generous and ‘easy’ Federal Reserve keeping assets bid and rates low in the face of inflation it chooses to ignore.

Meanwhile, the media and Washington have been laser focused on $38 billion worth of budget cuts, a whopping 1 percent of the entire budget, which as slight as it is in the scheme of things, disproportionately chops public good buckets. Rather than the excruciating time sink and mind-numbing arguments, it might have been best to just lop 1% off the top of everything proportionately, but that would have been too easy, and not political enough. Maybe then we could have shifted focus to the real cause of our budget woes – which is that our economy continues to deteriorate and the people with the power to do something about it are lying about its very cause and thus its remedies.

The flashing fuchsia elephant at the core of our economic, and thus budget problems – remains the response to the financial homicide imparted by the big-banks and abetted by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. There was a choice to be made in Washington in the fall of 2008 - smack Wall Street into place, do a good-ole free-market – you fail if you deserve to fail, we’ll protect consumer assets and that’s it maneuver - and deal with possibly intense, but definable fall-out for a short period.  Or - lavish bailout upon guarantee upon subsidy upon asset purchase upon the lowest rates in our nation’s history on Wall Street, and wring the very possibility of a recovery out of the general economy from the get-go. Of course, the brilliant minds of our exceedingly-privileged, out-of-touch, economic leadership decided on the former, and are acting their asses off to pretend that that decision, in itself, wasn’t the cause of the economic problems that followed, from Main Street anemia, to commodity inflation to international disdain and a weak currency that has no right to even have the purchasing capacity it still does.

And, yet Tim Geithner had the audacity of job-security to take his debt ceiling ‘plea’, on the Sunday Morning talk show circuit – really, we will be in crisis and other countries will think poorly of our ability to pay our debts if we don’t raise the ceiling and increase our debt. In truth, it is Tim Geithner’s ego on the line, while his boss, through staggering absence of mention, is fine with assuaging it. Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke remained silent about the topic, not least because between the Fed and the Treasury department, more debt has been racked up and issued in the past two years than ever before.  Of course, the debt cap will get raised, just as it got raised under Treasury Secretaries Paul O’Neil, John Snow and Hank Paulson.

When Geithner got elevated from the NY Federal Reserve head position of aiding Wall Street in its time of need to the Treasury Department, from where he could rubber stamp the entire bailout notion as being essential to our survival as a nation, the amount of Treasury Security debt outstanding was $5.7 trillion (in tradable securities, and $591 billion in nonmarketable ones.)  In August 2008, just before the most powerful banks sucked the soul out of the country in every manner possible, Treasury debt outstanding was  $4.9 trillion.

Today, outstanding Treasury debt stands at $9.1 trillion, an increase of $4.2 trillion since the big bailout began, most of which occurred under Geithner, though it started under Hank Paulson, who in 2007 and recently on Tim's behalf, has used all of Geithner's current arsenal of reasons to request a sizeable debt cap increase. All of it, allegedly to avoid a Depression and propel us to what has been deemed a slow recovery by none other than the Treasury Department, the White House and the Federal Reserve.

Geithner can (and will) keep pretending that this seismic debt increase was a requirement to fix our main economy, even though the actual fiscal stimulus package of the Obama administration accounts for only 18% of this increase, so the numbers just don’t fly.  Indeed, they only make sense if you take into consideration other diversions, like the $1.37 trillion of Treasuries, about a trillion of which is in excess bank reserves, and the nearly $1 trillion of mortgage-related securities parked at the Fed, the $142 billion of mortgage-related assets at the Treasury deparment, and various remaining FDIC guaranteed bank debt hangover from the bailout period, and sundries like JPM Chase’s ongoing Fed backing for its Bear Stearns’s acquisition.

Meanwhile, our debt interest will be more than $430 billion this year, or more than ten times the amount being quibbled about by the elected partisan politicians that are debating it, as the value of our debt and debt-worthiness diminishes.

Anyone can make promises that at some time in the future, some of any budget will be more in check, or even that unicorns will overtake the oval office and do a better job running the economy, but the fact remains – misguided, larcenous policies created a boatload of debt to float a financial system that continues to suck us dry (near zero borrowing costs from non-zero lending through mortgage, personal loans, credit cars, or whatever), and until this fact is given even an iota of a percentage of the time that the smaller bantering is given, we will continue to sink further into a financial abyss of the Fed’s, Treasury department’s, bi-partisan Congress’ and executive leadership’s making, no matter who’s in charge. For now, there are those excess reserves at the Fed - just saying.

Nomi Prins | 9 Comments | Share Article tagged Budget, S&P, Tim Geithner, US Debt Reader Comments (9)

much more pain required before anyone cares

April 18, 2011 | Warren

I know - how sad it is ....

April 18, 2011 | Nomi Prins

Your fans will always appreciate your no-nonsense approach. Never cut them slack. We wouldn't expect anything less of you, Nomi. Stay golden. Thanx a million.

April 18, 2011 | brien

Thanks so much, Brien!

April 18, 2011 | Nomi Prins

Nomi,Another great piece (I got to here via ZeroHedge) - I always enjoy your articles and TV Interviews. I don't have to say 'Keep up the good work', I know you will - and thank you for doing so.

DavidC

April 18, 2011 | DavidC

I hope 100,000,000 people read this. It is a concise description of what ails us. I got here from zerohedge where I clicked on your name because I lked the content of the article so much I wanted to know more about who wrote it. Great work! Thanks.

April 18, 2011 | unsure

Great post. I'm embarrassed to say that I'm just now stumbling on your writings (thank you ZeroHedge). If the average person understood just a fraction of what you wrote in this jam-packed piece, we might actually have a chance. Sadly, I don't see that happening, at least not until it's too late.

Oh well, it's off to the bookstore to pick up all your books.

Keep up the great work!

April 18, 2011 | Dan

unsure, you have hit the nail on the head! Yes, it would help if our citizens understood one iota of what this fine article is talking about but they don't. But take heart. They can put on a condom in nothing flat.Citizen stupidity is going to insure that we are a third world country in to time at all. That is what has created the $hit-mess that is south of our border. The politicians can tell them anything and they will buy it. The same thing is gradually happening in America.

April 18, 2011 | MarineCorpsVet

I believe Geithner actually engineered TARP 1 behind the scenes for Paulson. We're in uncharted territory and the fed is walking a tightrope. I don't think we're going to get to the other side when all is said and done. The numbers are just too big and overwhelming. Bottom line, buy some gold, some silver and take some cash and convert it into other currencies like the canadian and Australian dollar, swedish krone, swiss franc and maybe just a tiny amount into the euro. Don't be 100% in the US dollar.

I can't say that I'm surprised where we're headed. Don't forget the $845 Billion Global Poverty Act that Obama and Biden pushed in the senate in 2008 (senate bill s.2433)

Some reading on where we're headed:

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/04/deficit-reduction-are-higher-taxes-and.html

April 18, 2011 | Keith // Post a New Comment Enter your information below to add a new comment. My response is on my own website » Author:  (forget stored information) Author Email (optional): Author URL (optional): YAHOO.util.Event.addListener(window, "load", function() { document.getElementById("storedFieldControls").style.display = (Squarespace.StorableFields.isDataSaved("authorName", "authorEmail", "authorUrl") ? "inline" : "none"); Squarespace.StorableFields.recall("authorName", "authorEmail", "authorUrl"); }); function forgetSavedFields() { Squarespace.StorableFields.forget("authorName", "authorEmail", "authorUrl"); document.getElementById("storedFieldControls").style.display = "none"; } function expandBody() { b = document.getElementById("body"); b.style.height = (b.offsetHeight + 40) + "px"; } function shrinkBody() { b = document.getElementById("body"); b.style.height = (b.offsetHeight - 40) + "px"; } Post: ↓ | ↑   Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

   // Link an External Response Have a response on your own site? You can either use the [Trackback URL] for this entry, or link to your response directly. I want to leave a comment directly on this site » Article Title: Article URL: Article Excerpt (optional): Site Name: Site URL (optional): Author Name: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Copyright © 2006 - 2010, Nomi Prins. All rights reserved.

Site Design by AuthorWeb

Last week, President Obama driveled on about nothing of consequence in his budget speech. Yeah, he said he’d push to roll back tax cuts for the wealthy and close some off-shore corporate tax loopholes, but he’s said both (many times) before and neither happened, so in terms of revenue enhancement, it’s a non-starter.

Today, S&P – that beacon of toxic asset rating foresight (which has yet to be slapped with any monetary accountability for its collusive role in bringing down our economy) came to the astonishing conclusion that the United States has a debt problem, and tagged the country with a 'negative watch' label. The S&P report proceeded to highlight fiscal spending issues, related political debating, and our ridiculously high debt vs. GDP percentage, which is only a few points below 100, as points of main contention. It paid minor lip service to the ‘financial crisis’ as being a factor. It surprisingly (not) shied away from blaming ongoing and potentially further devastating fallout from the overleveraged mortgage related assets still clogging the books of the Fed, housing agencies and financial firms as the banking system maintains the appearance of solvency only through federally supported accounting gimmickry and an exceedingly generous and ‘easy’ Federal Reserve keeping assets bid and rates low in the face of inflation it chooses to ignore.

Meanwhile, the media and Washington have been laser focused on $38 billion worth of budget cuts, a whopping 1 percent of the entire budget, which as slight as it is in the scheme of things, disproportionately chops public good buckets. Rather than the excruciating time sink and mind-numbing arguments, it might have been best to just lop 1% off the top of everything proportionately, but that would have been too easy, and not political enough. Maybe then we could have shifted focus to the real cause of our budget woes – which is that our economy continues to deteriorate and the people with the power to do something about it are lying about its very cause and thus its remedies.

The flashing fuchsia elephant at the core of our economic, and thus budget problems – remains the response to the financial homicide imparted by the big-banks and abetted by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. There was a choice to be made in Washington in the fall of 2008 - smack Wall Street into place, do a good-ole free-market – you fail if you deserve to fail, we’ll protect consumer assets and that’s it maneuver - and deal with possibly intense, but definable fall-out for a short period.  Or - lavish bailout upon guarantee upon subsidy upon asset purchase upon the lowest rates in our nation’s history on Wall Street, and wring the very possibility of a recovery out of the general economy from the get-go. Of course, the brilliant minds of our exceedingly-privileged, out-of-touch, economic leadership decided on the former, and are acting their asses off to pretend that that decision, in itself, wasn’t the cause of the economic problems that followed, from Main Street anemia, to commodity inflation to international disdain and a weak currency that has no right to even have the purchasing capacity it still does.

And, yet Tim Geithner had the audacity of job-security to take his debt ceiling ‘plea’, on the Sunday Morning talk show circuit – really, we will be in crisis and other countries will think poorly of our ability to pay our debts if we don’t raise the ceiling and increase our debt. In truth, it is Tim Geithner’s ego on the line, while his boss, through staggering absence of mention, is fine with assuaging it. Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke remained silent about the topic, not least because between the Fed and the Treasury department, more debt has been racked up and issued in the past two years than ever before.  Of course, the debt cap will get raised, just as it got raised under Treasury Secretaries Paul O’Neil, John Snow and Hank Paulson.

When Geithner got elevated from the NY Federal Reserve head position of aiding Wall Street in its time of need to the Treasury Department, from where he could rubber stamp the entire bailout notion as being essential to our survival as a nation, the amount of Treasury Security debt outstanding was $5.7 trillion (in tradable securities, and $591 billion in nonmarketable ones.)  In August 2008, just before the most powerful banks sucked the soul out of the country in every manner possible, Treasury debt outstanding was  $4.9 trillion.

Today, outstanding Treasury debt stands at $9.1 trillion, an increase of $4.2 trillion since the big bailout began, most of which occurred under Geithner, though it started under Hank Paulson, who in 2007 and recently on Tim's behalf, has used all of Geithner's current arsenal of reasons to request a sizeable debt cap increase. All of it, allegedly to avoid a Depression and propel us to what has been deemed a slow recovery by none other than the Treasury Department, the White House and the Federal Reserve.

Geithner can (and will) keep pretending that this seismic debt increase was a requirement to fix our main economy, even though the actual fiscal stimulus package of the Obama administration accounts for only 18% of this increase, so the numbers just don’t fly.  Indeed, they only make sense if you take into consideration other diversions, like the $1.37 trillion of Treasuries, about a trillion of which is in excess bank reserves, and the nearly $1 trillion of mortgage-related securities parked at the Fed, the $142 billion of mortgage-related assets at the Treasury deparment, and various remaining FDIC guaranteed bank debt hangover from the bailout period, and sundries like JPM Chase’s ongoing Fed backing for its Bear Stearns’s acquisition.

Meanwhile, our debt interest will be more than $430 billion this year, or more than ten times the amount being quibbled about by the elected partisan politicians that are debating it, as the value of our debt and debt-worthiness diminishes.

Anyone can make promises that at some time in the future, some of any budget will be more in check, or even that unicorns will overtake the oval office and do a better job running the economy, but the fact remains – misguided, larcenous policies created a boatload of debt to float a financial system that continues to suck us dry (near zero borrowing costs from non-zero lending through mortgage, personal loans, credit cars, or whatever), and until this fact is given even an iota of a percentage of the time that the smaller bantering is given, we will continue to sink further into a financial abyss of the Fed’s, Treasury department’s, bi-partisan Congress’ and executive leadership’s making, no matter who’s in charge. For now, there are those excess reserves at the Fed - just saying.

much more pain required before anyone cares

I know - how sad it is ....

Your fans will always appreciate your no-nonsense approach. Never cut them slack. We wouldn't expect anything less of you, Nomi. Stay golden. Thanx a million.

Thanks so much, Brien!

Nomi,Another great piece (I got to here via ZeroHedge) - I always enjoy your articles and TV Interviews. I don't have to say 'Keep up the good work', I know you will - and thank you for doing so.

DavidC

I hope 100,000,000 people read this. It is a concise description of what ails us. I got here from zerohedge where I clicked on your name because I lked the content of the article so much I wanted to know more about who wrote it. Great work! Thanks.

Great post. I'm embarrassed to say that I'm just now stumbling on your writings (thank you ZeroHedge). If the average person understood just a fraction of what you wrote in this jam-packed piece, we might actually have a chance. Sadly, I don't see that happening, at least not until it's too late.

Oh well, it's off to the bookstore to pick up all your books.

Keep up the great work!

unsure, you have hit the nail on the head! Yes, it would help if our citizens understood one iota of what this fine article is talking about but they don't. But take heart. They can put on a condom in nothing flat.Citizen stupidity is going to insure that we are a third world country in to time at all. That is what has created the $hit-mess that is south of our border. The politicians can tell them anything and they will buy it. The same thing is gradually happening in America.

I believe Geithner actually engineered TARP 1 behind the scenes for Paulson. We're in uncharted territory and the fed is walking a tightrope. I don't think we're going to get to the other side when all is said and done. The numbers are just too big and overwhelming. Bottom line, buy some gold, some silver and take some cash and convert it into other currencies like the canadian and Australian dollar, swedish krone, swiss franc and maybe just a tiny amount into the euro. Don't be 100% in the US dollar.

I can't say that I'm surprised where we're headed. Don't forget the $845 Billion Global Poverty Act that Obama and Biden pushed in the senate in 2008 (senate bill s.2433)

Some reading on where we're headed:

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/04/deficit-reduction-are-higher-taxes-and.html

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Read Full Article »