larger | smaller
comments: 0
The Seven-Year Ditch
PRINCETON "“ There are historical precedents for sovereign-debt defaults by the countries of Europe's southern periphery, but they are not instantly attractive ones. Dealing with seemingly intractable problems often takes time. And it is difficult "“ especially in a democracy "“ to be patient.
The most obvious parallel to Europe's current woes is the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980's. In August 1982, Mexico threatened to default, and was quickly followed by other large borrowers, notably Argentina and Brazil. A default contagion would have brought down the banking systems of all the major industrial countries, and caused the world to relive something like the financial crisis of the Great Depression.
What followed was a seven-year play for extra time. The initial approach was to link policy improvements in the borrowing countries not only with help from international institutions, but also with additional lending from the banks "“ which seemed to defy the most elementary canons of sensible bank behavior.
Three years after the outbreak of the Latin American crisis, United States Treasury Secretary James Baker announced a systematization of the initial response. It was not very imaginative: Banks and multilateral development institutions should all lend more, and the debtors should continue their efforts to improve their macroeconomic policies. The Baker Plan was a universal disappointment. Growth faltered again, and the International Monetary Fund actually reduced its lending.
More than three years passed before new US Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady set out a more satisfactory program, in which banks would be given a menu of options that included lower interest rates on the debt and a hefty discount on the principal. If creditor banks were unwilling to accept some form of restructuring, they would have to put in new money. The lending of the international institutions might also be used for buying back discounted debt.
Brady's plan looked like a great success. Confidence returned, capital flight from Latin America was reversed, and capital markets became willing to provide financing again.
Inevitably, the Brady Plan looks like a good model for southern Europe. Why not avoid seven years of misery, and begin some similar rescue operation now that could lead to a return to economic vigor and dynamism?
The most obvious answer is that at an earlier stage in the Latin American saga, the banks simply could not have afforded to take such losses on their capital. They needed to fake it for seven years in order to build up adequate reserves against losses.
The initiative for the Brady Plan did not come from the official sector at all. It was the willingness of some large financial institutions to trade in discounted debt that established a market that could clear out the legacy of past mistakes.
Two institutions, in particular, took the lead: Citicorp in the US and Deutsche Bank in Europe. Their CEOs at the time presented their actions as being motivated by far-sighted benevolence and a concern for the well-being of the world as a whole. That may have been plausible, but the two banks also wanted to demonstrate publicly that they had better balance sheets than their weaker rivals. In Germany, the Dresdner Bank and the Landesbanken could not afford to take such a hit.
Moreover, despite the obvious "reform fatigue" of Latin American electorates, the debtor countries had engaged in a substantial measure of reform. Before the Brady Plan was announced, Mexico had accepted a wide-ranging Pact of Economic Solidarity and Growth, which immediately improve investor confidence and reduced sky-high domestic interest rates.
The final move to solve the debt problem came in the aftermath of international currency adjustment. One of the problems that had made the crisis more difficult after 1982 was the US dollar's appreciation. Likewise, today's euro crisis is harder to resolve because of the euro's strength in currency markets. The dollar's slide after 1985 made the real burden of Latin America's dollar debt much lighter.
Calling for a European Brady plan today does not guarantee the necessary conditions for such a plan to succeed. On all fronts, there has not been much progress. There is certainly plenty of frustration about the implementation of austerity, and no real indication of the long-term sustainability of reform efforts in southern Europe.
The problems of Europe's banks are also far from being resolved. A truly competitive European banking system would provide incentives for the larger and stronger banks to take more risks in the hope of growing even larger and stronger. But, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, policymakers are too pre-occupied by the real problems posed by too-big-to-fail banks, and too terrified by the potential collapse of weaker banks, to allow such a solution. Recapitalization has not yet reached the point where there are enough strong banks.
Finally, global uncertainty about currencies stands in the way of a solution. The euro's strength, despite the magnitude of the eurozone's difficulties, makes an export-led recovery strategy harder to realize. The common currency's strength reflects problems elsewhere in the world, but a euro exchange rate that would enable the return of confidence and growth is no less elusive for that.
Without the preconditions that made the Brady Plan work, simply transplanting a debt write-off would only augment uncertainty and fuel the political revulsion that already threatens to undermine European integration. And it may be that Europe "“ because of its relative prosperity "“ is less in a mood for the biblical seven lean years than was a much poorer Latin America in the 1980's.
Harold James is Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University and Professor of History at the European University Institute, Florence. His most recent book is The Creation and Destruction of Value: The Globalization Cycle.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org For a podcast of this commentary in English, please use this link:http://media.blubrry.com/ps/media.libsyn.com/media/ps/james53.mp3
You might also like to read more from Harold James or return to our home page.
Share Tweet
Reprinting material from this website without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact distribution@project-syndicate.org. var OB_langJS = 'http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js'; var OBITm = '1292502431965';var OB_raterMode = 'none';var OB_recMode = 'rec'; var OutbrainPermaLink='http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/james53/English'; if ( typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined' )OutbrainStart(); else { var OB_Script = true; var str = unescape("%3Cscript src=\'http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js\' type=\'text/javascript\'%3E%3C/script%3E"); document.write(str); } print recommend Send link clip secure rights COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
Username Password New registration Forgotten password AUTHOR INFO Harold James Harold James is Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University and Professor of History at the European University Institute, Florence. His most recent book is The Creation and Destruction of Value: The Globalization Cycle. MOST READ MOST RECOMMENDED MOST COMMENTED China's Bad Growth Bet Nouriel Roubini How Risky is the Global Economy? Mohamed A. El-Erian Gambling with the Planet Joseph E. Stiglitz Saif Qaddafi and Me Dani Rodrik Sleepwalking through America's Unemployment Crisis Mohamed A. El-Erian A New World Architecture George Soros No Time for a Trade War Joseph E. Stiglitz Did the Poor Cause the Crisis? Simon Johnson America's Political Class Struggle Jeffrey D. Sachs Avatar and Empire Naomi Wolf How Risky is the Global Economy? Mohamed A. El-Erian The Global Economy's Corporate Crime Wave Jeffrey D. Sachs The Goldstone Reversal Aryeh Neier China's Bad Growth Bet Nouriel Roubini Economics in Crisis J. Bradford DeLong ADVERTISEMENT PROJECT SYNDICATEProject Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 53 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
PROJECT SYNDICATE The Statesmen's Debate Jorge G. Castañeda, Richard N. Haass and Michel Rocard Has Barack Obama brought realism back to American foreign policy? Is a multi-polar world inevitable? Is the West to blame for the Middle East's current mess? ...read more The Ethics of Life Peter Singer Is human life really always sacred? Is Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection right - or left? Is charity a virtue or an obligation? ...read more Global Warning Bjørn Lomborg Should addressing climate change be the leading global priority? Can economic growth and environmental protection be reconciled? ...read more © Project Syndicate 1995 - 2011 How to become a member | Member papers | Support us | About us | Contact us var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10108778-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} _bizo_data_partner_id = 790 var OBCTm='1292510578203'; var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "8756795" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })(); _qoptions={ qacct:"p-f8E80KYHdFRZg" }; var _sf_async_config={uid:19954,domain:"project-syndicate.org"}; (function(){ function loadChartbeat() { window._sf_endpt=(new Date()).getTime(); var e = document.createElement('script'); e.setAttribute('language', 'javascript'); e.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript'); e.setAttribute('src', (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://a248.e.akamai.net/chartbeat.download.akamai.com/102508/" : "http://static.chartbeat.com/") + "js/chartbeat.js"); document.body.appendChild(e); } var oldonload = window.onload; window.onload = (typeof window.onload != 'function') ? loadChartbeat : function() { oldonload(); loadChartbeat(); }; })(); (function(w, c) { (w[c] = w[c] || []).push(function() { try { w.yaCounter6251587 = new Ya.Metrika({id:6251587, clickmap:true}); } catch(e) { } }); })(window, 'yandex_metrika_callbacks');You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
Project Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 53 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
Read Full Article »