The eurozone crisis is in some ways less complicated in its foundations than most people are making it. The fundamental problem is that Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal are stuck in recession or near recession and have not been allowed to adopt the policies needed to get out of it. In 2009 most countries followed expansionary policies to get out of recession: for example, a fiscal stimulus or expansionary monetary policy (witness the more than $2 trillion the US Federal Reserve has created since our recession began). In some cases countries also got a boost from a depreciating currency, which increased their exports and reduced their imports.
Evo Morales expanded his mandate with a landslide victory in a referendum last week. But the Washington foreign policy establishment still won't acknowledge he's delivering on his promises.
The stuggle is not between pro-Chávez and anti-Chávez factions but between left and right.
The bottom line on bailouts for Greece, Spain, Portugal and Ireland must be help, not punishment.
The peripheral European countries are stuck in a currency union where their monetary policy is dictated by the European Central Bank (ECB), which is far to the right of the US Federal Reserve and has little interest in helping them. Because these countries have adopted the euro, they also do not control their exchange rate; and their fiscal policy, with the imposition of budget cuts, is going in the wrong direction, under pressure from the European Commission, the ECB and the IMF.
No wonder, then, that Spain has more than 20 percent unemployment, Greece has nearly 15 percent unemployment and is sinking further into debt, and Ireland has lost about 17 percent of its income per person since the crisis began. Portugal just signed an agreement with the IMF that is projected to give it two more years of recession.
This does not make any economic sense, except from the point of view of creditors who want to make sure these countries are punished for their “excesses”—although, for the most part, it was not overborrowing but the collapse of the bubble and the world financial crisis and recession that brought them to this situation. Unfortunately, the view of the creditors is what prevails among the European authorities.
IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, currently jailed on sexual assault charges, understood the futility of some of these policies, but he was unable to change them very much, since IMF management is subordinate to the European authorities (and US Treasury). His imminent departure is therefore unlikely to change much, although it may speed up the process of Greece’s inevitable move toward debt restructuring.
Argentina defaulted on its foreign public debt in 2001, after years of trying the IMF route to recovery and sinking further into recession. The currency was cut loose from the dollar, and although economic free fall accelerated for one more quarter, it then recovered and grew 63 percent over the next six years. Within three years Argentina had reached its pre-crisis level of output; by contrast, Greece is not expected to reach its pre-recession level of GDP for at least eight years.
When will it end? So long as these governments are committed to policies that shrink their economies, their only hope is that the global economy will pick up steam and pull them out with demand for their exports. This does not look likely in the foreseeable future—the rest of Europe is not growing that rapidly and the US economy is still weak.
The governments of Greece, Portugal and Ireland need to tell the European authorities that they will not accept any “bailout” agreements that do not allow their economies to grow. That has to be the bottom line: help, not punishment. Spain has not yet entered into a loan agreement, but its situation is similar. These governments have a lot of unused bargaining power, since the European authorities are very much afraid of a default and/or exit from the euro by any one of them. And the European authorities have the money to help each and every one of these economies recover with expansionary macroeconomic policies. They just need to be told that “there is no alternative.”
If you like this article, consider making a donation.
Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.
1. posted by: Yad061 at 05/20/2011 @ 4:54pm
Your comment is pure Nixonian.
Fact is until fixed exchange rates were eliminated in the Nixon to Carter period, all nations controlled their exchange rates. Zimnbabwe is going down the tubes vis a vis exchange rats because the western banks are doing everything they can to make sure this happens. Granted, Mugabe does not seem to have a clue about the specifics of what is happening to him and his country but he does know who the culprits are. Too bad you don't.
What is needed is a return to the monetary order of Brettan Woods created by FDR rather than the chaos of having central banks enable hedge fund pirates to attack currencies each time they gamble with the future of a country whether than is Zimbabwe or the United States.
Greece and other countries using the Euro actually benefit from not being able to muck around with central bank policies. They reach a crisis quickly, they default, restructure their debts and - with luck - will reform their economies. They can't hide their problems, so they are forced to solve them while they're (relatively) small.
The USA, on the other hand, will keep printing money, keep hiding liabilities "off the books", keep scenarioing everybody rosily ... until a really BIG disaster hits.
And the notion that any country can "control its exchange rate" is just silly: if nobody wants Zimbabwe dollars, their exchange rate will go down the tubes, regardless of "controls".
P.S., Behind the scenes of the Scandal DSK, Strauss Kahn was the most powerful man in Europe at this time. As head of the IMF at a time when the bailout of the debt-wracked so-called PIIGS countries (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain) is considered the top priority, Strauss Kahn was actually enroute to Paris from New York to finalize crucial details of the new bailout arrangements of Greece, Portugal, and Ireland, when he was arrested on rape charges by the NYPD.
If he was set up, and evidence is mounting that this is a possibility, there are at least 100 top European bankers and leading powerbrokers who had every reason to sink Strauss Kahn. This scandal had little or nothing to do with the upcoming French Presidential elections. Straus-Kahn's arrest is about the survival of the entire European banking system.
This author has no idea of what he is writing about.
The crisis was caused in the first place by Greece, Portugal & Ireland, among others, giving up their sovereignty & accepting the Euro. As long as they are part of the European Union, they will be subject to the policies of their masters in the Rothchild banks that control the EU & the ECB. Currently the program of the Rothchild banks, known as the Inter-Alpha Group, is to break these countries completely. There is no bargaining room. To say that the banks are afraid of defaults is to assume that the banks are operating on their program of several years ago rather than the current, radical, anti-nation state program. The only power these countries have is to reassert their sovereignty & withdraw from the EU & declare a debt-moratorium against the onerous banks. As long as the leading political parties in these countries continue to kowtow to the ECB, they are toast. The situation is black & white. Either the banks take the hit or the people take the hit. At this point, there is no middle ground. There is no room for negotiation. There are no compromises to effect. It is do or die for Europe. Fortunately, from reading the European papers, a lot of Europeans from various political persuasions know this is true. Now we will see if any of the governments can actually stand up to the banks.
Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC
Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana
Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York
North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania
Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah
Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Read Full Article »
