Recs
By Tim Hanson | More Articles August 18, 2011 | Comments (4)
Keep track of the stocks that matter to you. Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.
When it comes to investing in China, I've seen a lot of "interesting" corporate structures. Nothing, however, has thrown me off more than recently listed online dating site Jiayuan.com (Nasdaq: DATE ) . The reason? It's unclear whether this company even has the right to be in business in China.There's shady, and then there's thisLike a lot of Chinese companies, Jiayuan is organized so that owners of the Nasdaq-listed stock don't actually "have any direct ownership interests or direct voting rights in any of our PRC [mainland China] operating companies."
Because the Chinese government restricts foreign ownership of things like Internet services and online payments businesses, and won't grant foreigners a license to provide online dating services, the listed company simply has contractual arrangements whereby the operating companies in China, which are owned by Jiayuan's Chinese management team, agree to allow the management team at the listed entity to direct the operations at the operating entities and obtain "substantially all" of their economic benefits. (Though "substantially all" -- their words, not mine -- seems to be something less than all.)If you're thinking this is complicated, confusing, ripe for conflicts of interest, and probably unenforceable in a court of law, you're right.All of this is quite common, though. Many of China's best-known companies, including Baidu (Nasdaq: BIDU ) and Sina (Nasdaq: SINA ) are organized in largely the same way. Of course, as any kindergartner knows, just because others are doing something doesn't make it right -- or in this case, legal.This is even shadierIn fact, online gaming company GigaMedia (Nasdaq: GIGM ) is currently being sued in federal court by the former head of its China operations, Wang Ji. At dispute is whether GigaMedia, because it controlled its Chinese operating subsidiary via contractual arrangement, actually has any right to its Chinese operations.When GigaMedia sought to replace Ji, he effectively absconded with the company, refusing to give up any of the documents that another party would need to operate that business in China. Ji claims GigaMedia has no rights to the documents because the corporate structure they set up, the same general structure used by Jiayuan, Baidu, Sina, et al, is illegal. If the U.S. court agrees with him -- and I believe there's a high likelihood that it will -- then GigaMedia will likely be out of luck in China, and U.S. shareholders in many Chinese companies will have to face the reality that their shares, pending corporate reorganizations, are potentially worthless.What will this do to valuations? I have no idea. It's unlikely, for example, that Baidu CEO Robin Li would run off with his company simply because he could. There's reputational risk in doing so, and Baidu also seems to enjoy the prestige and access that comes with a U.S. listing. At the very least, however, it's a huge unknown.Even more uncomfortableIf this situation makes you uncomfortable, know that this isn't the only potential bomb ticking in Jiayuan's corporate structure. The company's registration statement further reveals a contractual relationship in China with a nonprofit entity known alternately as Shanghai Shiji Jiayuan Matchmaking Center or Jiayuan Shanghai Center.
This nonprofit was established by one of Jiayuan's operating subsidiaries and exists because the relevant Shanghai governmental authority refused to allow a for-profit entity to provide "marriage agency services" -- a term that may cover matchmaking, Jiayuan's core business. As a result, Jiayuan Shanghai Center has the license to do the actually matchmaking, and agrees to pay technology license and service fees to Jiayuan's operating subsidiary, which supports it. I guess that these fees amount to almost all of Jiayuan Shanghai Center's revenue, since it's supposed to be a nonprofit.This seems like a convenient workaround for the company, and it was deemed legal by the company's Chinese legal counsel. But investors still don't know two things. First, how will regulators react when it becomes clear that the company is profiting from a nonprofit service? They could, among other things, fine the company or revoke its operating license -- events both potentially material to the financials and investment case here.Second, who actually owns the Jiayuan Shanghai Center and its seemingly critical business license, and what are his or her incentives, motivations, and potential conflicts of interest? That information may come to light at some point, but when we talked to company representatives in June, they refused to identify the owner(s). If Jiayuan Shanghai Center walks off with its license, what will happen to Jiayuan?The global viewAlthough it doesn't quite take a titanium spine to invest in China, it does require some thinking about how one can get comfortable with the existence of unknown unknowns. We've attacked this problem at Motley Fool Global Gains tactically by recommending investors only invest small amounts in a diversified basket of companies with China exposure, including some multinationals, and by avoiding companies with the most confusing and/or convoluted ownership structures. It seems the biggest China risk of all is whether foreign investors, when push comes to shove, will ever own the right to assets and cash flows in the country.Jiayuan is a profitable business with a significant market opportunity, but its corporate structure ranks among the most convoluted I've seen. That's why this Fool -- acknowledging that some of my Foolish colleagues disagree -- is staying away.Is Jiayuan too much risk for you? Let me know in the comments below.
Get Tim Hanson's top global stock picks by joining Motley Fool Global Gains. Tim's "Global View" column appears every Thursday on Fool.com.
Tim Hanson is co-advisor of Motley Fool Global Gains. He does not own shares of any company mentioned. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Jiayuan.com, Baidu, and Sina. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (7) Recommended 7 Times
Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment icon found on every comment.
Solid and helpful!
Tim,
How does this affect your recommendations such as WWIN, CGA, CCSC, YONG. Do US shareholders own these companies in any form? Thx, Pat.
None of those companies use the VIE/contract structure.
Tim
Hi Tim,
I'm a Canadian and I've been living in China for the past 9 years. All I can say is that it's impossible to understand them using "western thinking". The whole corporate legal structure is a joke, but the growth in China is very real. I like American companies that cater to the rising middle class like Ford, Apple, and Starbucks.
For people interested in international investing and a fresh look on the global markets in general, check out: http://www.landofsheep.com
It's an investment blog worth watching.
Your Fool username will be displayed with your comment. Please be respectful with your comments. Review our Fool's Rules.
Your comment may be delayed up to 15 minutes
Javascript is required to comment on Fool articles.
DocumentId: 1540494, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/19/2011 4:36:11 AM
Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.
Go to My Watchlist
Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.
Data delayed up to 5 minutes
Market Data provided by Terms & Conditions
Read Full Article »