We no longer check to see whether Telegraph.co.uk displays properly in Internet Explorer version 6 or earlier.
To see our content at its best we recommend upgrading if you wish to continue using IE or using another browser such as Firefox, Safari or Google Chrome.
Accessibility links
Thursday 15 September 2011
| Subscribe
Telegraph.co.uk Home News Sport Finance Comment Blogs Culture Travel Lifestyle Fashion Tech Dating Offers Jobs UK World Politics Obituaries Education Earth Science Defence Health News Royal Family Celebrities Weird News USA US Politics Asia China Central Asia Europe Australasia Middle East Africa South AmericaJeremy Warner
Will German indecision on the euro drag the whole world down? Monetary union hasnâ??t worked, but Germany, Europeâ??s strongest nation, wonâ??t face the consequences. For Germany to leave the euro is, perhaps, the least disruptive answer Photo: Alamy9:28PM BST 14 Sep 2011
Comments
Does Germany sincerely want to be in Europe? I pose this seemingly silly question because, as has long been apparent, Europeâ??s fate lies in that countryâ??s hands. As the great engine room of the European economy, it has the power to save or break the euro.
Rather than engaging in hollow threats to expel offenders, Germany could choose to stop inappropriately imposing its own monetary disciplines on others, and leave the euro itself. In the spirit of altruism, this might indeed be the best thing it could do for its fellow Europeans.
Yet torn between two constituencies â?? a policy elite that remains wedded to discredited ideas of European solidarity, and the great mass of the German people who do not see why they should be required to subsidise the profligacy of their ill-disciplined fellow travellers â?? Germany has become paralysed.
Trapped by their history, the countryâ??s leaders seem incapable of facing up to the choices that need to be made to bring the chaos of todayâ??s related sovereign debt and banking crises to any kind of meaningful resolution.
In its indecision, Germany threatens not just the future prosperity of Europe, including its own, but as is clear from the growing alarm of American and Chinese policymakers, that of the world economy as a whole.
There can be no more potent a symbol of how far the centre of economic gravity has shifted than the meeting scheduled for next week of â??Bricâ? nations to discuss joint action to help the eurozone. For the developing world to find it necessary to come to the aid of once-â??richâ?, advanced economies is a turnaround most of us did not think weâ??d see in our lifetimes.
The longer Europeâ??s debt crisis persists, the more likely it is that some kind of catastrophic denouement will plunge the world back into deep recession and possibly even long-lasting depression.
Not since the Second World War has Europe been at such a perilous crossroads. A project intended to bring once-warring nations closer has ended up only tearing them apart. Throughout the continent, there is now almost universal disillusionment with the single currency and the alleged benefits its supporters claimed it would bring.
Just as Germany yearns for the return of the deutschemark, peripheral nations look back longingly on the sometimes violent currency swings of pre-euro days as if it were a golden age. However unsettling the exchange rate turbulence of those times was, at least national governments were still in control of their own destiny. Now theyâ??ve lost even the blessing of low and stable interest rates.
There was something almost pitiful about the spectacle of George Papandreou, the Greek prime minister, promising on bended knee during last nightâ??s conference call with Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel to impose yet more job cuts and austerity in a desperate attempt to meet the demands of Paris and Berlin.
By joining the euro, Greece and other peripheral nations lost much more than control over interest and exchange rates. They also lost the capacity to issue debt in their own currencies. As a result, they are being progressively forced into default, a fate hitherto reserved only for developing and third world nations.
Just as bad, they have lost the discretion to apply counter-cyclical fiscal policies. To the contrary, they are being forced into such an extreme mix of deflationary measures to regain competitiveness that theyâ??ve lost the use even of automatic fiscal stabilisers to fight economic contraction.
A self-feeding spiral of economic destruction has established itself. Curiously for such a logical people, the Germans cannot seem to grasp that to inflict further punishment has become not just pointless but counter-productive. Germany has become like all disgruntled creditors: if it is not going to get its money back, then it is going to make the debtors suffer. Rather than thinking creatively about workable solutions, it obsesses only with the irrelevance of moral hazard and the perceived need to penalise miscreants.
As one who was once quite drawn to the idea of European Monetary Union, I can sympathise with the German dilemma. The economic dangers of such union without corresponding political and fiscal integration were always apparent, but as long as conditions remained benign, they were easy to ignore. Once set on a particular course, it becomes very difficult for the architects of that strategy to admit they were wrong. Theyâ??ll wriggle and squirm, and find any number of excuses for not changing course.
What is more, the process of euro area integration has now gone so far it cannot be disentangled in anything other than a profoundly negative manner. Monetary union of necessity gives rise to intense financial integration, which in turn creates collective problems â?? when one government faces a debt crisis, this will lead to financial repercussions in other member countries. For every troubled debtor, there is a troubled creditor.
As Paul De Grauwe, professor of economics at the University of Leuven, has put it in a defining paper on the difficulties of the eurozone, â??a monetary union can only function if there is a collective mechanism of mutual support and control. Such a collective mechanism exists in a political union. In the absence of a political union, the member countries of the eurozone are condemned to fill in the necessary pieces. What has been achieved, however, is still far from sufficient to guarantee the survival of the eurozoneâ?.
The problem is that Germany is determined not to go further. Indeed, it has now been told by its constitutional court that it mustnâ??t, never mind the concerns of ordinary Germans about being made liable for other peopleâ??s debts.
A happy, or even only mildly painful, ending to Europeâ??s debt crisis is becoming ever harder to imagine. Even if Germans could be persuaded of the merits of a full transfer union, it would take years to agree and implement the arrangements. It seems likely that markets would break the euro before we ever got there.
Nor does kicking Greece and other offenders out of the currency help very much â?? though it is increasingly difficult to see how they can remain in. As Willem Buiter, chief economist at Citigroup, has explained, Greeceâ??s exit would create a powerful and highly visible precedent. As soon as Greece had departed, markets would focus on the country or countries most likely to leave next. Deposits would flee all countries deemed at risk and head for the handful of â??safe havensâ? likely to remain in the euro area.
This deposit run in the periphery would in itself create financial havoc and a deep recession. There would also be a major banking crisis in creditor nations forced to take deep write-offs on their exposure to exiting countries, and a consequent collapse in credit in those nations.
Disorderly break-up involving the forced exit of weaker members, though perhaps now inevitable, certainly offers no economic panacea. So what would work? If Germany has become more the problem than the solution, then perhaps the departure of Germany itself is the least disruptive answer.
Last weekâ??s resignation of Jurgen Stark, holder of the Bundesbank flame on the European Central Bank board, in protest at ECB support for the European periphery, demonstrates that Germany is at the end of its patience. The euro hasnâ??t worked, and until a United States of Europe is formed, is most unlikely to. Time to face up to the truth.
Related ArticlesEU chief Barroso opens door for eurobonds
14 Sep 2011José Manuel Barroso's speech in full
14 Sep 2011Moody's downgrades two top French banks
14 Sep 2011Britain wins allies in calling for 'substantial' cut to European budget
12 Sep 2011Osborne warns of new EU fiscal union treaty
11 Sep 2011Jeremy Warner
9:28PM BST 14 Sep 2011
Comments
Does Germany sincerely want to be in Europe? I pose this seemingly silly question because, as has long been apparent, Europeâ??s fate lies in that countryâ??s hands. As the great engine room of the European economy, it has the power to save or break the euro.
Rather than engaging in hollow threats to expel offenders, Germany could choose to stop inappropriately imposing its own monetary disciplines on others, and leave the euro itself. In the spirit of altruism, this might indeed be the best thing it could do for its fellow Europeans.
Yet torn between two constituencies â?? a policy elite that remains wedded to discredited ideas of European solidarity, and the great mass of the German people who do not see why they should be required to subsidise the profligacy of their ill-disciplined fellow travellers â?? Germany has become paralysed.
Trapped by their history, the countryâ??s leaders seem incapable of facing up to the choices that need to be made to bring the chaos of todayâ??s related sovereign debt and banking crises to any kind of meaningful resolution.
In its indecision, Germany threatens not just the future prosperity of Europe, including its own, but as is clear from the growing alarm of American and Chinese policymakers, that of the world economy as a whole.
There can be no more potent a symbol of how far the centre of economic gravity has shifted than the meeting scheduled for next week of â??Bricâ? nations to discuss joint action to help the eurozone. For the developing world to find it necessary to come to the aid of once-â??richâ?, advanced economies is a turnaround most of us did not think weâ??d see in our lifetimes.
The longer Europeâ??s debt crisis persists, the more likely it is that some kind of catastrophic denouement will plunge the world back into deep recession and possibly even long-lasting depression.
Not since the Second World War has Europe been at such a perilous crossroads. A project intended to bring once-warring nations closer has ended up only tearing them apart. Throughout the continent, there is now almost universal disillusionment with the single currency and the alleged benefits its supporters claimed it would bring.
Just as Germany yearns for the return of the deutschemark, peripheral nations look back longingly on the sometimes violent currency swings of pre-euro days as if it were a golden age. However unsettling the exchange rate turbulence of those times was, at least national governments were still in control of their own destiny. Now theyâ??ve lost even the blessing of low and stable interest rates.
There was something almost pitiful about the spectacle of George Papandreou, the Greek prime minister, promising on bended knee during last nightâ??s conference call with Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel to impose yet more job cuts and austerity in a desperate attempt to meet the demands of Paris and Berlin.
By joining the euro, Greece and other peripheral nations lost much more than control over interest and exchange rates. They also lost the capacity to issue debt in their own currencies. As a result, they are being progressively forced into default, a fate hitherto reserved only for developing and third world nations.
Just as bad, they have lost the discretion to apply counter-cyclical fiscal policies. To the contrary, they are being forced into such an extreme mix of deflationary measures to regain competitiveness that theyâ??ve lost the use even of automatic fiscal stabilisers to fight economic contraction.
A self-feeding spiral of economic destruction has established itself. Curiously for such a logical people, the Germans cannot seem to grasp that to inflict further punishment has become not just pointless but counter-productive. Germany has become like all disgruntled creditors: if it is not going to get its money back, then it is going to make the debtors suffer. Rather than thinking creatively about workable solutions, it obsesses only with the irrelevance of moral hazard and the perceived need to penalise miscreants.
As one who was once quite drawn to the idea of European Monetary Union, I can sympathise with the German dilemma. The economic dangers of such union without corresponding political and fiscal integration were always apparent, but as long as conditions remained benign, they were easy to ignore. Once set on a particular course, it becomes very difficult for the architects of that strategy to admit they were wrong. Theyâ??ll wriggle and squirm, and find any number of excuses for not changing course.
What is more, the process of euro area integration has now gone so far it cannot be disentangled in anything other than a profoundly negative manner. Monetary union of necessity gives rise to intense financial integration, which in turn creates collective problems â?? when one government faces a debt crisis, this will lead to financial repercussions in other member countries. For every troubled debtor, there is a troubled creditor.
As Paul De Grauwe, professor of economics at the University of Leuven, has put it in a defining paper on the difficulties of the eurozone, â??a monetary union can only function if there is a collective mechanism of mutual support and control. Such a collective mechanism exists in a political union. In the absence of a political union, the member countries of the eurozone are condemned to fill in the necessary pieces. What has been achieved, however, is still far from sufficient to guarantee the survival of the eurozoneâ?.
The problem is that Germany is determined not to go further. Indeed, it has now been told by its constitutional court that it mustnâ??t, never mind the concerns of ordinary Germans about being made liable for other peopleâ??s debts.
A happy, or even only mildly painful, ending to Europeâ??s debt crisis is becoming ever harder to imagine. Even if Germans could be persuaded of the merits of a full transfer union, it would take years to agree and implement the arrangements. It seems likely that markets would break the euro before we ever got there.
Nor does kicking Greece and other offenders out of the currency help very much â?? though it is increasingly difficult to see how they can remain in. As Willem Buiter, chief economist at Citigroup, has explained, Greeceâ??s exit would create a powerful and highly visible precedent. As soon as Greece had departed, markets would focus on the country or countries most likely to leave next. Deposits would flee all countries deemed at risk and head for the handful of â??safe havensâ? likely to remain in the euro area.
This deposit run in the periphery would in itself create financial havoc and a deep recession. There would also be a major banking crisis in creditor nations forced to take deep write-offs on their exposure to exiting countries, and a consequent collapse in credit in those nations.
Disorderly break-up involving the forced exit of weaker members, though perhaps now inevitable, certainly offers no economic panacea. So what would work? If Germany has become more the problem than the solution, then perhaps the departure of Germany itself is the least disruptive answer.
Last weekâ??s resignation of Jurgen Stark, holder of the Bundesbank flame on the European Central Bank board, in protest at ECB support for the European periphery, demonstrates that Germany is at the end of its patience. The euro hasnâ??t worked, and until a United States of Europe is formed, is most unlikely to. Time to face up to the truth.
EU chief Barroso opens door for eurobonds
José Manuel Barroso's speech in full
Moody's downgrades two top French banks
Britain wins allies in calling for 'substantial' cut to European budget
Osborne warns of new EU fiscal union treaty
German minister raises Greek â??orderly defaultâ??
In Jeremy Warner
Latest deals from Amazon
News Most Viewed
EDITOR'S CHOICE »
Seventeen years after her death, one of the 20th century's true icons still has the ability to shock, says Philip Hensher.
Best deals from travelzoo
MORE FROM TELEGRAPH.CO.UK
Back to top
Hot Topics
© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2011
Terms and Conditions
Today's News
Archive
Read Full Article »