Broader Fed Audits Might Be Necessary Next Step

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commerical use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool on any article or visit www.djreprints.com

When banking and investment wizards inadvertently blew up the financial system in 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York required outside expertise on its triage team. And so it hired banking and investment wizards, including some who allegedly helped precipitate the devastating financial explosion, paying out $659.4 million across 103 contracts from 2008 through 2010. Among the hires were Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, State Street and JPMorgan Chase -- all of which were recipients of the government's TARP, or Troubled Assets Relief Program funds. The 10 largest contracts awarded by the New York Fed represented 74% of the total amount. Eight of the largest contracts were awarded without competitive bidding.

Recipients of the 10 largest contracts were BlackRock (no bid); Morgan Stanley (no bid); Ernst & Young (no bid); Allianz's Pimco (no bid); law firm Davis Polk & Wardell (no bid); Wellington Management (no bid); State Street; JPMorgan (no bid); Goldman Sachs; and Morgan Stanley's EMC (no bid). Much of the contracted work was with American International Group, Bear Stearns, Citigroup and Bank of America; the no-bids were awarded to companies that were familiar with the innards of these troubled institutions. The New York Fed was lending the troubled institutions money and needed help to evaluate the value of the assets that they proffered as collateral.

The history of this cozy arrangement between the regulators and the regulated is outlined in a 266-page, July 2011 audit by the Government Accountability Office that came to light during an Oct. 4 hearing by the House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, which is chaired by Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul. The story is also contained in a companion 127-page GAO audit, released Oct. 19, attacking the Fed's inadequate safeguards against potential conflicts of interest among board members at its regional banks. Both reports are one-time audits required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law.

Though the GAO says all 12 Federal Reserve Banks should tighten up their policies regarding potential conflicts of interest, the watchdog uncovered no crimes. The audit spotlighted the fact that some New York Fed directors were consulted by management and staff there about the creation of emergency facilities back in 2008, but that the board members had no direct role in approving any programs. Even so, those consultations looked bad. For example GE's CEO, Jeff Immelt, a New York Fed director at the time, was asked for advice about assisting the commercial-paper market. At the time, General Electric was one of the country's largest issuers of commercial paper. The GAO identified 18 instances of this sort of thing.

By reading both audits head to footnote, I noticed things that apparently the GAO did not. Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan both got big contracts in 2008, when company officers were New York Fed directors. Without going into individual cases, the GAO makes a blanket statement that no directors had a say on any vendor contracts. Bully for that.

But from the outside looking in, the Fed looks sloppier than expected, no doubt owing to its insulation from oversight. A Dodd-Frank tweak, authorizing even broader GAO audits of the Federal Reserve System, might be the perfect pill. 

Comments? E-mail: jim.mctague@barrons.com

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com

Twitter

Yahoo! Buzz

facebook

MySpace

Digg

LinkedIn

del.icio.us

NewsVine

StumbleUpon

Mixx

Maxim Group is bullish on shares of Sirius XM Radio, Pandora and Live Nation.

Lazard Capital argues that the shipping stock can gain 25% as earnings get a boost from Asian trade.

MKM Partners is bullish on shares of Spansion and Integrated Silicon Solution but has a sell rating on AMD.

Sterne, Agree has upgraded shares of the maker of computer touch pads and screens to Buy, citing "overly negative" investor sentiment.

General Electric's third-quarter results failed to impress investors, however the stock, which yields 3.6%, looks cheap.

Securities firm Benchmark is reducing its gas-price assumptions in the coming year because of an "unanticipated surge" in drilling activity.

Citing the mining stock's recent fall, Canaccord argues that shares can gain at least 30%.

As grocery shoppers turn to cheaper-priced store brands, consider shares of Ralcorp, writes Janney Capital Markets.

Shares of Leap Wireless can jump 50% on the back of improved subscriber growth, writes Brigantine Advisors.

Investors aren't giving this high-yielding drug stock enough credit for future growth prospects.

Regulators say BNY Mellon was cheating clients in currency trades. The potential lessons for retail forex traders.

Don't count on a rapid or enduring resolution of the European crisis. A hard landing in store for China?

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold trades for far less than the value of its mining assets. The company could be a major beneficiary of the red metal's rebound—or a takeover offer.

Teradata helps companies sift through massive piles of data for valuable insights. One good idea: Buy the stock.

Big managed-care outfits, struggling for earnings growth, may soon turn to acquisitions of smaller rivals. The stocks of some target companies could leap 50%.

Bonds run counter to gains in stocks as confidence in Europe increases.

The once highflying mutual fund is down sharply this year, and one of its top executives has abruptly left the firm. Is there a connection?

No bad news was good news for U.S. stocks last week. Plus, auto shares look attractive. More split-ups and spinoffs are coming. And activist investors see value in CMGI.

An expert looks at the potential changes and concludes that there's probably more smoke than fire.

Technology stocks no longer command much respect from investors. As a result, some of our best picks—like Apple, Oracle and Hewlett-Packard—are available cheap. Others like Fusion-io will grow at a big multiple of the U.S. economy.

Data point to an economy that is expanding, but modestly. Philly purchasing managers' index quietly rises.

Under CEO Mark Papa, EOG Resources shifted its focus from gas production to oil. The change in direction has paid off handsomely.

Some Ameriprise employees are suing the company because it limited their retirement-fund choices to Ameriprise-owned funds.

A disconcerting earnings report has caused shares of the huge tech haven to stumble, but the stock should recover by year's end.

Co-managers of the MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield fund like companies that use their cash flow to help shareholders. Why they favor BCE, Vodafone and Nestlé

Intel wows the crowd, Apple draws gasps. How the tech leaders became drama queens.

Read Full Article »




Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes