larger | smaller
comments: 2
A Gravity Test for the Euro
CAMBRIDGE "“ Although I appreciate that exchange rates are never easy to explain or understand, I find today's relatively robust value for the euro somewhat mysterious. Do the gnomes of currency markets seriously believe that the eurozone governments' latest "comprehensive package" to save the euro will hold up for more than a few months?
The new plan relies on a questionable mix of dubious financial-engineering gimmicks and vague promises of modest Asian funding. Even the best part of the plan, the proposed (but not really agreed) 50% haircut for private-sector holders of Greek sovereign debt, is not sufficient to stabilize that country's profound debt and growth problems.
So how is it that the euro is trading at a 40% premium to the US dollar, even as investors continue to view southern European government debt with great skepticism? I can think of one very good reason why the euro needs to fall, and six not-so-convincing reasons why it should remain stable or appreciate. Let's begin with why the euro needs to fall.
Absent a clear path to a much tighter fiscal and political union, which can lead only through constitutional change, the current halfway house of the euro system appears increasingly untenable. It seems clear that the European Central Bank will be forced to buy far greater quantities of eurozone sovereign (junk) bonds. That may work in the short term, but if sovereign default risks materialize "“ as my research with Carmen Reinhart suggests is likely "“ the ECB will in turn have to be recapitalized. And, if the stronger northern eurozone countries are unwilling to digest this transfer "“ and political resistance runs high "“ the ECB may be forced to recapitalize itself through money creation. Either way, the threat of a profound financial crisis is high.
Given this, what arguments support the current value of the euro, or its further rise?
First, investors might be telling themselves that in the worst-case scenario, the northern European countries will effectively push out the weaker countries, creating a super-euro. But, while this scenario has a certain ring of truth, surely any breakup would be highly traumatic, with the euro diving before its rump form recovered.
Second, investors may be remembering that even though the dollar was at the epicenter of the 2008 financial panic, the consequences radiated so widely that, paradoxically, the dollar actually rose in value. Although it may be difficult to connect the dots, it is perfectly possible that a huge euro crisis could have a snowball effect in the US and elsewhere. Perhaps the transmission mechanism would be through US banks, many of which remain vulnerable, owing to thin capitalization and huge portfolios of mortgages booked far above their market value.
Third, foreign central banks and sovereign wealth funds may be keen to keep buying up euros to hedge against risks to the US and their own economies. Government investors are not necessarily driven by the return-maximizing calculus that motivates private investors. If foreign official demand is the real reason behind the euro's strength, the risk is that foreign sovereign euro buyers will eventually flee, just as private investors would, only in a faster and more concentrated way.
Fourth, investors may believe that, ultimately, US risks are just as large as Europe's. True, the US political system seems stymied in coming up with a plan to stabilize medium-term budget deficits. Whereas the US Congress's "supercommittee," charged with formulating a fiscal-consolidation package, will likely come up with a proposal, it is far from clear that either Republicans or Democrats will be willing to accept compromise in an election year. Moreover, investors might be worried that the US Federal Reserve will weigh in with a third round of "quantitative easing," which would further drive down the dollar.
Fifth, the current value of the euro does not seem wildly out of line on a purchasing-power basis. An exchange rate of $1.4:â?¬1 is cheap for Germany's export powerhouse, which could probably operate well even with a far stronger euro. For the eurozone's southern periphery, however, today's euro rate is very difficult to manage. Whereas some German companies persuaded workers to accept wage cuts to help weather the financial crisis, wages across the southern periphery have been marching steadily upwards, even as productivity has remained stagnant. But, because the overall value of the euro has to be a balance of the eurozone's north and south, one can argue that 1.4 is within a reasonable range.
Finally, investors might just believe that the eurozone leaders' latest plan will work, even though the last dozen plans have failed. Abraham Lincoln is credited with saying "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time." A comprehensive euro fix will surely arrive for some of the countries at some time, but not for all of the countries anytime soon.
So, yes, there are plenty of vaguely plausible reasons why the euro, despite its drawn-out crisis, has remained so firm against the dollar so far. But don't count on a stable euro-dollar exchange rate "“ much less an even stronger euro "“ in the year ahead.
Kenneth Rogoff is Professor of Economics and Public Policy at Harvard University, and was formerly chief economist at the IMF.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.orgFor a podcast of this commentary in English, please use this link:http://traffic.libsyn.com/projectsyndicate/rogoff86.mp3
You might also like to read more from Kenneth Rogoff or return to our home page.
Share Tweet
Reprinting material from this website without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact distribution@project-syndicate.org. var OB_langJS = 'http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js'; var OBITm = '1292502431965';var OB_raterMode = 'none';var OB_recMode = 'rec'; var OutbrainPermaLink='http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/rogoff86/English'; if ( typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined' )OutbrainStart(); else { var OB_Script = true; var str = unescape("%3Cscript src=\'http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js\' type=\'text/javascript\'%3E%3C/script%3E"); document.write(str); } print recommend Send link clip secure rights COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
Username Password New registration Forgotten password Pmcdonald 11:13 03 Nov 11It seems like there are too many savings and not enough places to put them. So people buy Euros despite the best efforts of the Eurodoods to depreciate. It seems that there are too many savings and not enough productive investments we can make. Is the productive capacity of our planet less than we thought....and are we are all poorer than we thought, espacially the highly indebted consumption-crazy Americans. And how will this play out.
acardin 12:22 03 Nov 11I think this article underestimates the fourth argument and therefore although europeans are in a mess right now, I think that the problems of the american economy are greater. Also, the expansive monetary policy of the US would keep on trying to "support" the economy, while the ECB is always looking for mantaining stable inflation rates, even now, and independent of what happens with greece. But like I said, the reason is not because europeans don't have any monetary problems, is because the monetary policy of the US is a mess...
AUTHOR INFO Kenneth Rogoff Kenneth Rogoff is Professor of Economics and Public Policy at Harvard University, and was formerly chief economist at the IMF. MOST READ MOST RECOMMENDED MOST COMMENTED The Instability of Inequality Nouriel Roubini To Cure the Economy Joseph E. Stiglitz Milton Friedman's Magical Thinking Dani Rodrik The ECB's Battle against Central Banking J. Bradford DeLong America at Stall Speed? Mohamed A. El-Erian A New World Architecture George Soros Did the Poor Cause the Crisis? Simon Johnson America's Political Class Struggle Jeffrey D. Sachs To Cure the Economy Joseph E. Stiglitz No Time for a Trade War Joseph E. Stiglitz America at Stall Speed? Mohamed A. El-Erian The People versus the Police Naomi Wolf The End of Population Growth Sanjeev Sanyal Does Redistributing Income Reduce Poverty? Jagdish Bhagwati America's Other 87 Deficits Stephen S. Roach ADVERTISEMENT PROJECT SYNDICATEProject Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 54 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
PROJECT SYNDICATE The Rebel Realist Joschka Fischer Has the project for European Union reached its end? Is further EU enlargement antagonistic to deeper integration? ...read more Crossing Cultures Ian Buruma Is multiculturalism a blessing or a curse? Must democracy be secular or can religion play a role? Does the "West" still exist and, if so,what does it stand for? ...read more Capitalism Then and Now Harold James Is globalization reversible? Do currencies rise and fall like empires? How does culture influence economic development and performance? ...read more © Project Syndicate 1995 - 2011 How to become a member | Member papers | Support us | About us | Contact us _bizo_data_partner_id = 790 var OBCTm='1292510578203'; var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "8756795" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })(); _qoptions={ qacct:"p-f8E80KYHdFRZg" }; (function(w, c) { (w[c] = w[c] || []).push(function() { try { w.yaCounter6251587 = new Ya.Metrika({id:6251587, clickmap:true}); } catch(e) { } }); })(window, 'yandex_metrika_callbacks');You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
It seems like there are too many savings and not enough places to put them. So people buy Euros despite the best efforts of the Eurodoods to depreciate. It seems that there are too many savings and not enough productive investments we can make. Is the productive capacity of our planet less than we thought....and are we are all poorer than we thought, espacially the highly indebted consumption-crazy Americans. And how will this play out.
I think this article underestimates the fourth argument and therefore although europeans are in a mess right now, I think that the problems of the american economy are greater. Also, the expansive monetary policy of the US would keep on trying to "support" the economy, while the ECB is always looking for mantaining stable inflation rates, even now, and independent of what happens with greece. But like I said, the reason is not because europeans don't have any monetary problems, is because the monetary policy of the US is a mess...
Project Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 54 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
Read Full Article »