Why Has the Economic Recovery Been So Slow?

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool on any article or visit www.djreprints.com

Begin with a detailed score card. The recovery from the 2008-09 recession has been the slowest since any recession in the post-World War II era. It has taken nine calendar quarters since the recession ended in the second quarter of 2009 for real gross domestic product to climb back to its fourth-quarter '07 peak. Assume the same rates of growth during the recoveries from the two previous recessions that rank second and third in severity since World War II -- '81-'82 and '74-'75 -- and the recovery from the recent recession should have taken half as long.

Try other comparisons. In the more than 41 years since 1970, the average quarterly rate of growth, calculated on an annual basis, has been 2.8% -- and that includes all negative quarters in recessions. By contrast, over the recent nine quarters of recovery, the annual rate of growth has averaged just 2.4% -- and as mentioned in last week's column, the Blue Chip consensus forecast calls for more of the same through 2012. Following the recessions of '74-'75 and '81-'82, the first nine quarters of growth averaged, respectively, 5.1% and 6.3%.

Try special excuses. Yes, it's true that the government portion of GDP usually increases year-to-year, and over the past nine quarters there was a small decrease. It's also true that rebounds in housing usually make significant contributions to GDP growth after recessions, and over the past nine quarters residential investment has also been running slightly negative.

So what if we "forgave" this recent period its problems with both government and housing, and recalculated all GDP growth excluding these two components? Even after this heroic attempt to handicap the recent period, it still comes up woefully short. The plunge in real private-sector GDP excluding residential investment was the most severe since World War II, so according to the usual "rubber band" pattern, the rebound should have been proportional.

But over the past nine quarters, growth of real private-sector GDP excluding residential investment has averaged 2.6%, versus 3.8% and 4.7%, respectively, for the nine quarters following the recessions of '74-'75 and '81-'82.

ONE KEY SOURCE OF DISAGREEMENT about the subpar recovery lies in the role played by government policy. Has government been part of the solution, and therefore might it do even more to help solve our economic problems? Or has government mainly been part of the problem itself?

While I suspect the latter, I withhold judgment for the time being, awaiting the 2010 update of the Vancouver, British Columbia-based Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom Index. Originally developed with the help of free-market economist Milton Friedman, the EFI tracks 42 separate measures equally weighted under five different categories, including "Size of Government," "Access to Sound Money" and "Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business." In light of the bipartisan bickering that is likely to get even more heated as Republican hopefuls square off against President Obama on the economy's ills, it's worth noting that over the long-term, the EFI tells a relatively nonpartisan story.

For example, Economic Freedom moved higher in the administration of Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and even edged up under Bill Clinton, another Dem, to a 30-year high by 2000. The index then began to fall under the administration of Republican George W. Bush. Since research shows that fluctuations in the EFI, up or down, correlate with economic growth, that may be one reason why growth under Bush was noticeably slower than growth under Clinton.

Also noteworthy: The one-year fall in the EFI from 2008 to '09, the most recent year for which data are available, was the largest on record.

FOR SKEWED USE OF DATA on our economic problems, a good example is a Dec. 7 op-ed in the Washington Post by CNN journalist Fareed Zakaria. According to him, "data simply do not support" the idea that "the economy is burdened by excessive government regulation, interference and taxes."

What data? Well, says Zakaria, try the Kauffman Foundation's Index of Entrepreneurial Activity, which reports a large share of Americans starting their own business. But the Kauffman Foundation's own report -- in the executive summary, no less -- laments "the Great Recession and its high unemployment rates pushing many individuals into business ownership."

Or, says Zakaria, notice that a World Economic Forum survey ranks the U.S. as fifth in economic competitiveness. But the survey report itself notes the "escalating weaknesses that have lowered the U.S. ranking in recent years," including concerns over "government's ability to maintain arms-length relationships with the private sector," "regulation as more burdensome" and "burgeoning levels of public indebtedness" -- some of the very things Zakaria dismisses as not supported by the data.

Such "escalating weaknesses" tend to correlate with slower rates of growth. Data from the World Economic Forum are part of the Economic Freedom Index. More on this in future columns. 

E-mail: gepstein@barrons.com

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com

Twitter

facebook

MySpace

Digg

LinkedIn

del.icio.us

NewsVine

StumbleUpon

The oil-services stock rose Friday on news of a settlement with BP. Now investors can focus on its strong fundamentals.

By Richard C. Morais Penta rounds up year-end reports, insights, and 2012 calendar dates to help you end the year on a high-note.

With shipbuilding funded at $14.9 billion, General Dynamics will benefit.

The offshore driller still needs to show sustainable improvement, though.

Maxim Group says that Cree tops Veeco and Aixtron.

The airline is benefitting from downsizing at AMR.

Beaten-down shares of Vertex Pharmaceuticals offer a buying opportunity if new drugs live up to expectations.

Buoyed by strong earnings Thursday, shares of the global shipping giant should continue to feel the tailwinds of an improving U.S. economy.

Keefe Bruyette favors names such as Bank of Marin and BBCN.

A Montana well is giving solid results, which is good for GeoResources.

Picking winners hasn't been easy this year. Here are ideas advisers say should be crossed off your list.

Why 2012 has all the makings of, as an old Chinese axiom puts it, an "interesting" year. The debt problem just won't go away.

Ambev has a history of strong profit and stock-market gains. And with its excellent position in fast-growing markets, past should be prologue for the Brazilian brewer.

Divergence between VIX and euro bodes well for U.S. markets.

DVD rentals are far from dead. That's great news for the owner of Redbox, which is taking more U.S. market share as Netflix focuses on video streaming and growth abroad.

Yields on 10-year Treasuries don't have anywhere to go but up in the next year. Low short-term rates are given.

AllianceBernstein Small Cap Growth Fund's Bruce Aronow is looking for what Wall Street analysts miss. Why he likes Catalyst Health Solutions.

The huge fund-rating house is putting up new consumer products: analyst ratings, in addition to its star system. Barron's looks this week at some of the helpful as well as the mixed signals emerging from the new duality.

Van Hoisington of Texas-based Hoisington Investment Management believes the economy is heading for another recession—and that means the bull market in bonds isn't going anywhere.

Wall Street gave the Web darling a rude greeting, as the skeptics prevailed on the IPO's first day of trading.

Sam Palmisano, who's retiring as Big Blue's boss, brought the company—and its mindset—into the 21st century.

A panel of investors' average forecasts looks for GDP growth in Europe of 2.5% to 3.5%.

Investors are furious that they can't get back the gold and silver they stashed with the failed brokerage.

Slower growth forecasts and Europe's uncertain future have prompted money managers to get conservative on stock picks in the region.

Read Full Article »




Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes