A reminder that there is a housing crash in progress:
Home builders started construction on just 428,600 single-family homes in 2011 and completed just 444,900 single-family homes, the Census Bureau reported Thursday. Both were the lowest totals since the bureau started keeping records in 1959. And the last few years have been much worse than any other stretch during that period.
Source: Census BureauIt is even more striking to adjust the level of construction for population growth. In 1982, the previous nadir, builders started construction on one new home for every 350 United States residents. In 2011, one new home was started for every 727 residents.
Source: Census BureauIncluding multifamily homes changes the picture somewhat. The 583,900 housing units completed in 2011 is stil the lowest number on record, but multifamily construction activity is starting to increase. Construction started on 606,900 units during the year, exceeding the totals in 2009 and 2010.
And there is growing sentiment among home builders and economists that the bottom has been reached and construction will increase in 2012. Builders are securing more permits, and the pace of housing starts rose in the fourth quarter.
"This is not another false dawn; it's the real deal," Ian Shepherdson, chief United States economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note to clients this week.
Mortgage rates remain at record lows, more people are finding jobs, and Mr. Shepherdson sees signs that lenders are starting to loosen their purse strings. He points to a decline in average required down payments.
Add in the possibility of a huge settlement that could help some homeowners avoid foreclosure and allow lenders to foreclose on others more quickly, and there is reason to think the records set last year will endure.
E-mailPrintRecommendShare CloseTumblrDiggLinkedinRedditPermalink housing, Housing Starts Related PostsFrom EconomixThe Fed’s Advice on the Housing CrisisUnwanted Homes, Unwanted WorkersCounting the Underwater HomeownersReader Feedback: Why American Migration Might Be FallingAmerican Migration Reaches Record Low Previous Post Should We Trust Paid Experts on the Volcker Rule? Next Post More on Romney’s Tax Rate (and Everyone Else’s)// jQuery(document).ready(function($) { NYTD.commentsInstance = new EmbeddedComments($, 'NYTD.commentsInstance'); NYTD.commentsInstance.init({configName: 'default'}); }); // /**/ /**/Search This Blog Search Previous Post Should We Trust Paid Experts on the Volcker Rule? Next Post More on Romney’s Tax Rate (and Everyone Else’s)Follow This BlogTwitterRSS In order to view this feature, you must download the latest version of flash player here.var so = new SWFObject("http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/flash/business/20090302-econ-indicators-graphic/econIndicators.swf","nytSWF", 334,290,9,"#FFFFFF"); so.addParam("allowScriptAccess","always"); so.addParam("allowFullScreen","true"); so.addParam("BASE","http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/flash/business/20090302-econ-indicators-graphic/"); so.addVariable("allowCaching",true); so.write("embed70");#embed70{visibility:visible !important;}h2.multiHeadline {font-size:156% !important;padding:0px 0px 7px !important;margin:6px 6px 11px 3px !important;border-bottom:1px solid #CCCCCC !important;}Featured More on Romney’s Tax Rate (and Everyone Else’s)Factoring corporate, state and local taxes into what the wealthiest — and other Americans — pay.
Should We Trust Paid Experts on the Volcker Rule?A report commissioned by a lobbying group for the securities industry should not be taken as objective analysis of the impact of a rule to restrict risky trading activities by large banks, an economist writes.
What the Top 1% of Earners Majored InThe majors providing the best entree into the top income rank are pre-med, economics, biochemistry, zoology and biology.
Testing for NeedEasier eligibility for some government programs for the needy has contributed to the rise in government spending, an economist writes.
Measuring the Top 1% by Wealth, Not IncomeAn analysis of Fed data shows the wealth gap, as measured by net worth, is much more extreme than the chasm as measured by income.
/**/Featured ContributorsFloyd Norris, the chief financial correspondent of The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, covers the world of finance and economics.
Posts | Profile | E-mailCatherine Rampell is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
Posts | Profile | E-mailMotoko Rich is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
Posts | Profile |E-MailDaily EconomistsEach day, Economix offers perspectives from expert contributors.
Bruce BartlettFormer Treasury OfficialBio | PostsNancy FolbreUniversity of Massachusetts-AmherstBio | PostsSimon JohnsonM.I.T./Peterson InstituteBio | PostsCasey B. MulliganUniversity of ChicagoBio | PostsUwe E. ReinhardtPrinceton UniversityBio | PostsJudith Scott-ClaytonColumbia UniversityBio | PostsLaura D'Andrea TysonUniversity of California, BerkeleyBio | PostsAbout EconomixEconomics doesn't have to be complicated. It is the study of our lives "” our jobs, our homes, our families and the little decisions we face every day. Here at Economix, journalists and economists analyze the news and use economics as a framework for thinking about the world. We wel
A reminder that there is a housing crash in progress:
Home builders started construction on just 428,600 single-family homes in 2011 and completed just 444,900 single-family homes, the Census Bureau reported Thursday. Both were the lowest totals since the bureau started keeping records in 1959. And the last few years have been much worse than any other stretch during that period.
It is even more striking to adjust the level of construction for population growth. In 1982, the previous nadir, builders started construction on one new home for every 350 United States residents. In 2011, one new home was started for every 727 residents.
Including multifamily homes changes the picture somewhat. The 583,900 housing units completed in 2011 is stil the lowest number on record, but multifamily construction activity is starting to increase. Construction started on 606,900 units during the year, exceeding the totals in 2009 and 2010.
And there is growing sentiment among home builders and economists that the bottom has been reached and construction will increase in 2012. Builders are securing more permits, and the pace of housing starts rose in the fourth quarter.
"This is not another false dawn; it's the real deal," Ian Shepherdson, chief United States economist at High Frequency Economics, wrote in a note to clients this week.
Mortgage rates remain at record lows, more people are finding jobs, and Mr. Shepherdson sees signs that lenders are starting to loosen their purse strings. He points to a decline in average required down payments.
Add in the possibility of a huge settlement that could help some homeowners avoid foreclosure and allow lenders to foreclose on others more quickly, and there is reason to think the records set last year will endure.
Factoring corporate, state and local taxes into what the wealthiest — and other Americans — pay.
A report commissioned by a lobbying group for the securities industry should not be taken as objective analysis of the impact of a rule to restrict risky trading activities by large banks, an economist writes.
The majors providing the best entree into the top income rank are pre-med, economics, biochemistry, zoology and biology.
Easier eligibility for some government programs for the needy has contributed to the rise in government spending, an economist writes.
An analysis of Fed data shows the wealth gap, as measured by net worth, is much more extreme than the chasm as measured by income.
Floyd Norris, the chief financial correspondent of The New York Times and The International Herald Tribune, covers the world of finance and economics.
Catherine Rampell is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
Motoko Rich is an economics reporter for The New York Times.
Each day, Economix offers perspectives from expert contributors.
Economics doesn't have to be complicated. It is the study of our lives "” our jobs, our homes, our families and the little decisions we face every day. Here at Economix, journalists and economists analyze the news and use economics as a framework for thinking about the world. We welcome feedback, at economix@nytimes.com.
Read Full Article »