larger | smaller
comments: 2
WASHINGTON, DC "“ Among the fundamental principles of any functioning justice system is the following: Don't lie to a judge or falsify documents submitted to a court, or you will go to jail. Breaking an oath to tell the truth is perjury, and lying in official documents is both perjury and fraud. These are serious criminal offenses, but apparently not if you are at the heart of America's financial system. On the contrary, key individuals there appear to be well compensated for their crimes.
As Dennis Kelleher of Better Markets has argued, the recent so-called "robo-signing" settlement "“ in which five large banks "settled" their legal liability for carrying out fraudulent foreclosures on mortgages "“ is a complete sell-out to the financial industry.
First, there was no serious criminal prosecution "“ meaning that no one will be charged with a felony, and no one will go to jail. In terms of affecting executives' incentives, this is the only thing that matters.
Even the terminology used to frame the discussion is wrong. Kelleher, an attorney with extensive experience in private practice and the public sector, tells it like it is: ""?robo-signing' is massive, systematic, fraudulent, criminal conduct." Alternatively, as he points out, we could just call it "lying, cheating, and stealing."
Second, the civil penalties in this settlement "“ a form of fine "“ are minuscule relative to the size of the companies involved. As Shahien Nasiripour, one of the best reporters on this issue, dryly put it: "None of the five lenders have said they expect to incur a material charge due to the settlement." In other words, from a corporate perspective, the penalty is a trifling affair.
Third, such fines are, in any case, paid by the companies' shareholders, not by their executives or board members (all of whom carry insurance). In the rare cases in which fines have been levied on individuals, either their insurance policies picked up most of the bill, or the penalties were trivial relative to the cash compensation that they received while committing their crimes "“ or both.
As if all of this weren't bad enough, the banks reportedly will be able to use government money to write down the value of mortgages, which amounts to subsidizing them to pay their own meaningless fines.
The Obama administration and its allies have worked hard to sell its roughly $20 billion settlement with the banks as one that will have a meaningful impact on the housing market. But nothing could be further from the truth. As Kelleher points out, the United States has "more than 10 million homes under water" (the outstanding mortgage exceeds the house's value). "Twenty billion dollars doesn't make a dent in that: one million homes at $20,000 loan forgiveness is it."
In fact, the Obama administration's settlement with the mortgage lenders is consistent with its track record on all of its policies related to the financial sector, which has been abysmal. But it is also puzzling. Why would the administration continue to bend over backwards to be lenient towards top bankers under these circumstances?
I honestly do not believe that the administration's stance reflects any form of corruption "“ payments made to individuals or even to political campaigns. And, in this case, it does not even appear to reflect the lobbying power of big financial players. That power certainly explains why the Dodd-Frank financial reforms enacted in 2010 were not stronger, and why there is now so much opposition to effective implementation of that legislation (for example, there is currently a huge fight around the "Volcker rule," which would limit proprietary trading by megabanks). But mortgage lenders' criminal activities are another matter.
Indeed, at stake in the mortgage settlement are fundamental and systemic breaches of the rule of law "“ perjury and fraud on an economy-wide scale. The Justice Department has, without question, all of the power that it needs to prosecute these alleged crimes fully. And yet America's top law-enforcement officials have consistently "“ and now completely "“ backed off.
The main motivation behind the administration's indulgence of serious criminality evidently is fear of the consequences of taking tough action on individual bankers. And maybe officials are right to be afraid, given the massive size of the banks in question relative to the economy. In fact, those banks are bigger now than they were before the crisis, and, as James Kwak and I documented at length in our book 13 Bankers, they are much larger than they were 20 years ago.
Top bankers want to make a lot of money. They also want to stay out of prison. Political leaders can huff and puff as much as they want, but, without a credible threat of poverty and time behind bars, bankers have no reason to comply with the law. For them, it's all about the trade "“ and you can be the sucker in public policy as easily as you can be the sucker in an individual loan agreement.
The message to bank executives today is simple: build your bank to be as big as possible "“ and then keep growing. If you manage to become big enough, you and your employees are not just too big to fail, but also too big to jail.
The Obama administration has just made everyone else the sucker.
Simon Johnson, a former chief economist of the IMF, is co-founder of a leading economics blog, http://BaselineScenario.com, a professor at MIT Sloan, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and co-author, with James Kwak, of 13 Bankers.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2012. www.project-syndicate.orgFor a podcast of this commentary in English, please use this link:http://traffic.libsyn.com/projectsyndicate/johnson29.mp3
You might also like to read more from Simon Johnson or return to our home page.
Share Tweet
Reprinting material from this website without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact distribution@project-syndicate.org. var OB_langJS = 'http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js'; var OBITm = '1292502431965';var OB_raterMode = 'none';var OB_recMode = 'rec'; var OutbrainPermaLink='http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/johnson29/English'; if ( typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined' )OutbrainStart(); else { var OB_Script = true; var str = unescape("%3Cscript src=\'http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js\' type=\'text/javascript\'%3E%3C/script%3E"); document.write(str); } print recommend Send link clip secure rights COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
COMMENTSYou must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
Username Password New registration Forgotten password sufferingsuccatash 05:51 22 Feb 12As I understand the settlement, some of the fines the bankers face can be paid through mortgage mark downs. In other words, shaving a couple thousand off an underwater mortgage likewise shaves a couple thousand off the institution's fine. Paying fines with other people's money is a bit unusual. Don't you think?
childehassam 08:16 22 Feb 12Just look at Lanny Breuer when he is on TV, saying with a straight face that the Justice Deparmtent is working really-really hard to prosecute financial wrong-doing. Is he a fraud or a fool? Both?
AUTHOR INFO Simon Johnson Simon Johnson, a former chief economist of the IMF, is co-founder of a leading economics blog, http://BaselineScenario.com, a professor at MIT Sloan, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and co-author, with James Kwak, of 13 Bankers. MOST READ MOST RECOMMENDED MOST COMMENTED A Crisis in Two Narratives Raghuram Rajan Capturing the ECB Joseph E. Stiglitz Coronary Capitalism Kenneth Rogoff Blaming Capitalism for Corporatism Edmund S. Phelps and Saifedean Ammous From Argentina to Athens? Mohamed A. El-Erian A New World Architecture George Soros America's Political Class Struggle Jeffrey D. Sachs Did the Poor Cause the Crisis? Simon Johnson To Cure the Economy Joseph E. Stiglitz No Time for a Trade War Joseph E. Stiglitz Capital Shrugged Mark Spitznagel Austerity under Attack Daniel Gros The Iranian Nuclear Threat Goes Global Itamar Rabinovich The Ethics of Internet Piracy Peter Singer Germany's Sunshine Daydream Bjørn Lomborg Take a link for this article: <a href="http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/johnson29/English">Too Big to Jail</a> ADVERTISEMENT PROJECT SYNDICATEProject Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 59 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
PROJECT SYNDICATE Against the Current Robert Skidelsky Are markets moral? What does the East expect from the West? Has globalization killed the idea of equality? ...read more Unconventional Economic Wisdom Joseph E. Stiglitz Is "boom and bust" a permanent feature of the capitalist order? ...read more The Rebel Realist Joschka Fischer Has the project for European Union reached its end? Is further EU enlargement antagonistic to deeper integration? ...read more © Project Syndicate 1995 - 2012 How to become a member | Member papers | Support us | About us | Contact us _bizo_data_partner_id = 790 var OBCTm='1292510578203'; var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "8756795" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })(); _qoptions={ qacct:"p-f8E80KYHdFRZg" }; (function(w, c) { (w[c] = w[c] || []).push(function() { try { w.yaCounter6251587 = new Ya.Metrika({id:6251587, clickmap:true}); } catch(e) { } }); })(window, 'yandex_metrika_callbacks');You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
You must be logged in to post or reply to a comment. Please log in or sign up for a free account.
As I understand the settlement, some of the fines the bankers face can be paid through mortgage mark downs. In other words, shaving a couple thousand off an underwater mortgage likewise shaves a couple thousand off the institution's fine. Paying fines with other people's money is a bit unusual. Don't you think?
Just look at Lanny Breuer when he is on TV, saying with a straight face that the Justice Deparmtent is working really-really hard to prosecute financial wrong-doing. Is he a fraud or a fool? Both?
Project Syndicate: the world's pre-eminent source of original op-ed commentaries. A unique collaboration of distinguished opinion makers from every corner of the globe, Project Syndicate provides incisive perspectives on our changing world by those who are shaping its politics, economics, science, and culture. Exclusive, trenchant, unparalleled in scope and depth: Project Syndicate is truly A World of Ideas.
Project Syndicate provides the world's foremost newspapers with exclusive commentaries by prominent leaders and opinion makers. It currently offers 59 monthly series and one weekly series of columns on topics ranging from economics to international affairs to science and philosophy.
Read Full Article »