Cato on Facebook Cato on Twitter Cato on Google+ Cato on YouTube Cato Mobile Cato RSS
Policy Analysis no. 696 May 10, 2012
May 10, 2012 Policy Analysis no. 696
by Morris A. Davis
Morris A. Davis is academic director of the James A. Graaskamp Center for Real Estate and associate professor in the Department of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics at the University of Wisconsin—Madison, School of Business.
Morris A. Davis is academic director of the James A. Graaskamp Center for Real Estate and associate professor in the Department of Real Estate and Urban Land Economics at the University of Wisconsin—Madison, School of Business.
Published on May 10, 2012
For decades U.S. housing policy has focused on promoting homeownership. In this study, I show that the set of policies designed to further homeownership has been ineffective and expensive and that homeownership as a public policy goal is not well supported.
I document that homeownership rates have remained roughly constant over the past 40 years. I then show why homeownership policies have not boosted homeownership rates. The first policy I consider, the deductibility of mortgage interest from income for tax purposes, is a tax break enjoyed by people earning above-median incomes who should otherwise have no trouble buying a home. The other key policy, the subsidization of the large mortgage entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purposes of reducing the rate of mortgage interest, has been ineffective because Fannie and Freddie marginally affect mortgage interest rates, and mortgage interest rates are essentially uncorrelated with homeownership rates. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests the present value of the cost of these two policies to U.S. taxpayers is a staggering amount, $2.5 trillion.
Finally, I show that policymakers fail to make the case for promoting homeownership as an explicit public policy goal. I note that the costs and risks of homeownership are almost never discussed by public agencies and that the benefits of homeownership as widely articulated are either hard to measure or are quickly refutable. I conclude that U.S. housing policies and government institutions designed to promote homeownership are deeply flawed. Serious discussion should occur at the highest levels about eliminating current policies and de-emphasizing homeownership as a policy objective.
Download the PDF of Policy Analysis no. 696 (1 MB) View this Policy Analysis in HTML Get Adobe Reader
Full text of Policy Analysis no. 696
? 2012 The Cato InstitutePlease send comments to webmaster
Financial Fiasco: How America's Infatuation with Home Ownership and Easy Money Created the Economic Crisis
An easily accessible work on the economic crisis, the book guides readers through a world of irresponsible behavior, showing how many of the "solutions" being implemented are repeating the mistakes that caused the crisis.
Printer Friendly Version
Feeds for Cato events: RSS • iCal
The Clash of Economic IdeasCato Book Forum, Noon
The American Welfare State: How We Spend Nearly $1 Trillion a Year Fighting Poverty — And FailCato Capitol Hill Briefing, Noon
The Tea Party: Three PrinciplesCato Book Forum, Noon
Ron Paul's rEVOLution: The Man And the Movement He InspiredCato Book Forum, 6:00 pm
American Nightmare: How Government Undermines the Dream of HomeownershipCato Book Forum, Noon
The Future of Federal Highway Finance: Diversions, Deficits, or Devolution?Cato Policy Forum, Noon
Investment Protectionism And What to Do about ItCato Policy Forum, 4:00 pm
The Future of the U.S. Navy Surface FleetCato Policy Forum, Noon
[ More Events ]
Feeds for Cato events: RSS • iCal
[ More Events ]
May 11, 2012The Clash of Economic IdeasCato Book Forum, Noon
May 14, 2012The American Welfare State: How We Spend Nearly $1Trillion a Year Fighting Poverty — And FailCato Capitol Hill Briefing, Noon
May 15, 2012The Tea Party: Three PrinciplesCato Book Forum, Noon
May 15, 2012Ron Paul's rEVOLution: The Man And theMovement He InspiredCato Book Forum, 6:00 pm
May 16, 2012American Nightmare: How Government Underminesthe Dream of HomeownershipCato Book Forum, Noon
May 17, 2012The Future of Federal Highway Finance: Diversions,Deficits, or Devolution?Cato Policy Forum, Noon
Read Full Article »