Earlier today, in an open letter to President Donald Trump, we joined with more than 150 economists from universities, think tanks, and businesses across the country to urge the president to confront one of the most damaging and least-discussed obstacles to global prosperity: international anti-competitive market distortions (ACMDs).
For decades, trade debates have been dominated by tariffs—the visible, headline-grabbing taxes that nations impose on imports and, occasionally, on exports. Tariffs are easy to measure. Yet they are only the tip of the iceberg. Beneath them lies a complex and far more damaging set of distortions that quietly undermine competition and economic growth: discriminatory regulations, state subsidies, and other “protections” that favor domestic champions over foreign competitors.
ACMDs invariably sap productivity, distort the economy, and destroy wealth.
Our open letter to President Trump, printed below in its entirety and signed by some of the country’s most prominent economic theorists and practitioners, asks the president to use this moment and the leverage of U.S. trade policy to lead a global reset. The Trump administration has rightly highlighted the shortcomings of America’s trade relationships. The problem is real. But the true injustice lies not just in tariff schedules but in the deeper, structural distortions that prevent open and fair competition.
Over the past several decades, the international trading system has generally succeeded in reducing tariffs across the board. What it has not done is meaningfully address non-tariff barriers, including regulatory manipulation. As a result, the most consequential obstacles to faster economic growth today are not at the border, but behind it.
When a government shields its state-owned enterprises with veiled subsidies or tilts domestic regulation to crowd out foreign firms, it is engaging in protectionism by another name. Economists increasingly agree that the impact of these non-tariff distortions likely exceeds that of tariffs several times over.
President Trump’s instincts—to question complacent trade orthodoxy and demand reciprocity—have opened a rare window of opportunity. Whether one agrees with his particular approach, the administration’s willingness to confront entrenched interests and rethink policy from first principles is welcome.
What’s needed now is a clear framework: U.S. trade agreements should be evaluated and negotiated on the basis of how effectively they reduce all anti-competitive market distortions, not just tariff barriers.
A strategy focused on ACMDs would produce enormous dividends. Even modest reductions in these distortions would lift U.S. and global per capita GDP.
A recent study by the Competere Foundation for the independent Growth Commission on which we both sit suggests that if countries want to spur economic growth, they would be wise to 1) dismantle laws and regulations that distort domestic competition and 2) abolish tariff and non-tariff barriers that distort international competition. The Competere Foundation study estimates that, if the United States were to do these things, U.S. per capita GDP would jump by an extra 31 percent over ten years.
Fortunately, the United States is uniquely positioned to lead this effort. American markets remain among the world’s most open and competitive. That gives President Trump the leverage he needs to force change on America’s reluctant trading partners.
A trade policy centered on dismantling global market distortions would align perfectly with America’s comparative strengths—rule of law, transparency, fervent entrepreneurism, and never-ending innovation. It would also place the U.S. at the moral center of a new pro-growth international consensus.
This is not a partisan appeal. It is a call to return trade policy to its first principles: fair competition, open markets, and the creation of wealth through voluntary exchange. The U.S. can and should use its diplomatic and economic leverage to encourage its trading partners to do the same.
Mr. President, tear down these economic distortions! The wealth of nations—and the prosperity of billions—depends on it.
Dear President Trump,
We the undersigned write to ask the US government to tear down international anti-competitive market distortions (ACMDs). Your administration's policy provides an opportunity for a reset to deal not only with tariff barriers but also with all market distortions that damage the competitive process and thus destroy wealth. Regrettably, these ACMDs, which include both traditional tariff and non-tariff barriers as well as regulatory matters that distort ordinary market competition and lack of property rights protection, have not been well addressed in the international trading system or by major trading countries in the past thirty years. These issues are major impediments to economic growth, and indeed recent economic models suggest that the costs of non-tariff ACMDs may be considerably more impactful than conventional border barriers.
The Trump administration is right to highlight the problem with its proposed trade realignment. While many of us differ on the medicine we would use to treat the problem, we think that a framework that measures the US’s trade agreements with other countries on the basis of their success in lowering these ACMDs should ground US trade policy actions at this time. A systematic reduction of ACMDs across the board in all countries would be a significant boost to U.S. and global GDP per capita, giving opportunity and hope to billions.
Sincerely,
Alden Abbott, George Mason University
Zoltan Acs, George Mason University
Anup Agrawal, University of Alabama
Michael Alderson, Saint Louis University
JJ Arias, Georgia College & State University
Dom Armentano, University of Hartford
Lowell Bassett, University of Washington
Don Bellante, University of South Florida
Daniel K. Benjamin, Clemson University
Walter E. Block, Loyola University, New Orleans
Cecil E Bohanon, Ball State University
Michael Bond, Arizona State University
Barbara Bowie-Whitman, The Growth Commission
Scott Bradford, Brigham Young University
Robert L. Bradley Jr., Institute for Energy Research
Phillip J. Bryson, Brigham Young University
Richard Burdekin, Claremont McKenna College
Henry N. Butler, George Mason University
Robert T. Carey, Clemson University
James Carter, Navigators Global
Julia R. Cartwright, The American Institute for Economic Research
Robert E. Chatfield, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Barry R. Chiswick, George Washington University
Susan Christoffersen, Thomas Jefferson University
Warren Coats, International Monetary Fund
Joe Cobb, Congressional Joint Economic Committee, 1985-91
Robert A. Collinge, University of Texas, San Antonio
Roy Cordato, The John Locke Foundation
Mark Crain, Lafayette College
Clyde Wayne Crews Jr., Competitive Enterprise Institute
Kirby R. Cundiff, VCI Asset Management
Paul F. Cwik, University of Mount Olive
D. Allen Dalton, Boise State University
Larry Dann, University of Oregon
Robert Dekle, University of Southern California
Abigail Devereaux, Wichita State University
Arthur M. Diamond, Jr., University of Nebraska, Omaha
Gregg Dimkoff, Grand Valley State University
Gerald Dwyer, Clemson University
Isaac Ehrlich, University at Buffalo
Kenneth G. Elzinga, University of Virginia
Richard W. England, University of New Hampshire
Steve Entin, Tax Foundation
Richard E. Ericson, East Carolina University
John Estill, San Jose State University
Frank Falero, California State University
John A. Flanders, Central Methodist University
Garry Flemming, Roanoke College
Michele Fratianni, Indiana University
Douglas C. Frechtling, George Washington University
Caleb S. Fuller, Grove City College
Moheb Ghali, Western Washington University
Anthony Gill, University of Washington
David Gillette, Truman State University
Stephan F. Gohmann, University of Louisville
Peter Gordon, University of Southern California
Eric S. Graber, University of Maryland Global Campus
Philip Graves, University of Colorado, Boulder
William Green, Sam Houston State University
R.W. Hafer, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Stephen Happel, Arizona State University
Lydia Harris, Goucher College
Daniel Heath, Institute of International Economic Law
Scott Hein, Texas Tech University
Robert Heller, Federal Reserve Board, 1986-89
James W. Henderson, Baylor University
John Hoehn, Michigan State University
Arlene Holen, Technology Policy Institute
Charley L. Hooper, Objective Insights, Inc.
Daniel Houser, George Mason University
Miren Ivankovic, Anderson University
Jerry L Jordan, Council of Economic Advisers, 1981-82
Demetrius Kantarelis, Assumption University
James B Kau, University of Georgia
Barry Keating, University of Notre Dame
John Kessler, Purdue University
Richard Kilmer, University of Florida
Richard M. Kirk, Georgia State University
Cory Krupp, Duke University
David Laband, Auburn University
Nicholas A. Lash, Loyola University, Chicago
Thomas Lenard, Technology Policy Institute
Christopher Lingle, Universidad Francisco Marroquin
Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi, Winston-Salem State University
Herman Manakyan, Salisbury University
Richard D. Marcus, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Michael L. Marlow, Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Timothy Mathews, Kennesaw State University
Michael J. McIlhon, Metropolitan State University
W. Douglas McMillin, Louisiana State University
Douglas McWilliams, The Growth Commission
Roger Meiners, University of Texas, Arlington
Francois Melese, Naval Postgraduate School
Stephen T. Mennemeyer, University of Alabama, Birmingham
James C. Miller III, George Mason University
Jeff Milyo, University of Missouri
James Moncur, University of Hawaii, Manoa
Barry Morris, University of North Alabama
Chris Muscarella, Penn State University
Robert Nachtmann, University of Texas, El Paso
Patrick Newman, University of Tampa
David Ozgo, Advocacy Analytics, LLC
Donald O. Parsons, George Washington University
EC Pasour, North Carolina State University
Judd W. Patton, Bellevue University
Mark V Pauly, University of Pennsylvania
William Peirce, Case Western Reserve University
Timothy Perri, Appalachian State University
Charles R. Plott, California Institute Of Technology
Arturo Porzecanski, American University
James E. Prieger, Pepperdine University
Stephen W. Pruitt, University of Missouri, Kansas City
Christine P. Ries, Georgia Institute of Technology
Nancy Roberts, Arizona State University
John W Rowe Jr, University of South Florida
Tony Rufolo, Portland State University
Nicholas Rupp, East Carolina University
John Rutledge, Claremont Graduate University
Joseph Salerno, Mises Institute
James W. Saunoris, Eastern Michigan University
Frederic Sautet, The Catholic University of America
John Scott, University of North Georgia
Robert Seeley, Wilkes University
Carlos Seiglie, Rutgers University
Stephen Shmanske, California State University, East Bay
Gene Silberberg, University of Washington, Seattle
John Silvia, Dynamic Economic Analysis
Shanker Singham, The Growth Commission
Vernon L. Smith, Chapman University
Charles Starnes, Wayland Baptist University
Charles N. Steele, Hillsdale College
Bernell K. Stone, Brigham Young University
Thomas Stratmann, George Mason University
Michael Sullivan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Daniel Sutter, Troy University
Andre Switala, Boston University
Gil Sylvia, Oregon State University
George B. Tawadros, Winona State University
Shawn E. Thomas, University of Pittsburgh
Henry Thompson, Auburn University
Alex Tokarev, Northwood University
Richard Vedder, Ohio University
Deborah Walker, Fort Lewis College
Sherri Wall, University of Alaska, Fairbanks
John T. Warner, Clemson University
Andrew Weintraub, Temple University
Lonny L. Wilson, William Penn University
Michael Wohlgenant, North Carolina State University
Gary Wolfram, Hillsdale College
Bill Yang, Georgia Southern University
Madelyn Young, Converse University
Clare W. Zempel, Zempel Strategic
Jerry Zimmerman, University of Rochester
Joseph Zoric, Franciscan University of Steubenville
Benjamin Zycher, American Enterprise Institute