« The Fed and Asset Prices | Main
The yield on 10-year Treasuries has slipped back to just a hair over 3% - despite the fact that the US has hit its legal "debt ceiling." The fresh reversal in yields appears to be further evidence against the ongoing hard-money fears that the combination of quantitative easing, deficit spending, and a falling Dollar are sure to spell inflationary doom. As Paul Krugman likes to quip, the bond market vigilantes remain invisible.
From a monetary policy perspective, the behavior of the Treasury market would suggest that it may be too early to tap on the policy breaks. Here I offer an alternative perspective "“ one that I suspect will find some play among Fed officials. Recall that in his recent press conference, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke focused on the need to maintain stable inflation expectations. Consider the behavior of an admittedly rudimentary measure of inflation expectations, the spread between Treasuries and inflation protected Treasuries:
By this measure, inflation expectations have come off their peaks in recent weeks. Further evidence that bond market vigilantes were getting ahead of themselves? Or evidence that the Fed did what "needed" to be done "“ throttle back on monetary policy to keep expectations under control?
In other words, I can see where some Fed officials could make the case that financial markets are simply responding positively to good, old-fashioned monetary austerity. The implications for policy are straightforward; officials could pat themselves on the back for a job well done, rather than worry that the move toward tighter money was once again premature.
From my perspective, recent market activity has followed a standard playbook "“ the advent of QE2 pushed market participants into the obvious trades. Long equities and commodities and short Dollar. Trades that worked because they were balanced on a kernel of truth. Global economic activity did firm, and interest rate differentials should be Dollar negative. At the same time, there was always a risk the trades would overextend and collapse, either under their own weight because the Fed took away part of the story. Perhaps it's been a little of both, with at least energy prices clearly sapping US growth and the Fed calling it quits on quantitative easing. What is left? An economy that is growing yet remains mired at a suboptimal level relative to potential output. Very similar to what we had before QE2 "“ an economic roundtrip to somewhere that is at least within sight of another lost decade for US job growth.
Comments Patting Themselves on the Back?
The yield on 10-year Treasuries has slipped back to just a hair over 3% - despite the fact that the US has hit its legal "debt ceiling." The fresh reversal in yields appears to be further evidence against the ongoing hard-money fears that the combination of quantitative easing, deficit spending, and a falling Dollar are sure to spell inflationary doom. As Paul Krugman likes to quip, the bond market vigilantes remain invisible.
From a monetary policy perspective, the behavior of the Treasury market would suggest that it may be too early to tap on the policy breaks. Here I offer an alternative perspective "“ one that I suspect will find some play among Fed officials. Recall that in his recent press conference, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke focused on the need to maintain stable inflation expectations. Consider the behavior of an admittedly rudimentary measure of inflation expectations, the spread between Treasuries and inflation protected Treasuries:
By this measure, inflation expectations have come off their peaks in recent weeks. Further evidence that bond market vigilantes were getting ahead of themselves? Or evidence that the Fed did what "needed" to be done "“ throttle back on monetary policy to keep expectations under control?
In other words, I can see where some Fed officials could make the case that financial markets are simply responding positively to good, old-fashioned monetary austerity. The implications for policy are straightforward; officials could pat themselves on the back for a job well done, rather than worry that the move toward tighter money was once again premature.
From my perspective, recent market activity has followed a standard playbook "“ the advent of QE2 pushed market participants into the obvious trades. Long equities and commodities and short Dollar. Trades that worked because they were balanced on a kernel of truth. Global economic activity did firm, and interest rate differentials should be Dollar negative. At the same time, there was always a risk the trades would overextend and collapse, either under their own weight because the Fed took away part of the story. Perhaps it's been a little of both, with at least energy prices clearly sapping US growth and the Fed calling it quits on quantitative easing. What is left? An economy that is growing yet remains mired at a suboptimal level relative to potential output. Very similar to what we had before QE2 "“ an economic roundtrip to somewhere that is at least within sight of another lost decade for US job growth.
var TPConnect = {}; TPConnect.tpc_url = 'http://economistsview.typepad.com/timduy/2011/05/patting-themselves-on-the-back.html'; TPConnect.tpc_title = document.getElementById('tpc_post_title').innerHTML; TPConnect.tpc_message = document.getElementById('tpc_post_message').innerHTML; View the entire comment thread. About Subscribe to this blog's feed Recent Posts Patting Themselves on the Back? The Fed and Asset Prices A Quote Note on Trade Wild Week Leaves Fed Policy Intact Monetary Policy on Autopilot Epicurean Update Very High Bar for QE3 Quick Note on Inflation Expectations On the Logic of Inflation Hawks Q1 Growth Looking Weak "“ Will it Affect the Fed? Recent Comments a on Patting Themselves on the Back? Bruce on The Fed and Asset Prices Robert on The Fed and Asset Prices a on The Fed and Asset Prices PeakVT on Monetary Policy on Autopilot Niklas Blanchard on Monetary Policy on Autopilot Postkey on Very High Bar for QE3 Moopheus on Very High Bar for QE3 Anonymous on Very High Bar for QE3 Apps 55753818692 57604852 9cfb5a666c56e52ae2f81297bcf2c9ab on On the Logic of Inflation Hawks Economist's View Archives May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 Categories Economics Fed Watch Monetary Policy The Oregon Economy Travel Search var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-1951341-1"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} _qoptions = { tags:"typepad.core" }; _qacct="p-fcYWUmj5YbYKM"; quantserve(); var captchaImgAttempts = 0; var allowAnonComments = '0'; var registrationRequired = 0; var registrationOptional = 1; var emailRequired = 0; var useAvatars = 0; var showSignInMessaging = 0; var jsonURL = "/.services/json-rpc"; var captchaSrc = "/.services/captcha?code_encrypted="; var alertCommentCannotBeBlank = "You can not leave an empty comment. Please enter some text in the Comment field."; var alertEditingExpired = "Sorry, you're no longer allowed to edit this comment. You may have taken too much time before submitting your edit or someone may have already replied to it."; var alertAuthorCannotBeBlank = "Name must not be blank."; var alertEmailCannotBeBlank = "Email Address must not be blank."; var alertAuthorAndEmailCannotBeBlank = "Name and email address are both required!"; var alertEmailIsInvalid = "The Email Address you entered is invalid. Please enter a valid email address."; var alertUnauthorizedAction = "The comments on this post are closed."; var msgPostReplyTo = "Reply to "; var msgInReplyTo = "In reply to "; var msgPostAComment = "Post a comment "; var atpCommentsPath = "/.shared/js/atpcomments_yui.js?v=5"; var hasChanged = 0; var hostName = ".typepad.com"; var tp_comment_token = "1305741810-ada7a838019f3809fa74122e6df82457436a8e22:vHnjR8rbcPPWmWul"; var isPage = 0; var blog_xid = "6a00d83451b33869e20111684285a2970c"; var xid = ""; var injectCode = '\n\tVerify your Comment\n Previewing your Comment\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.\n \t\n\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\n \n\t\n\n\t \n Your comment could not be posted. Error type: \n\t\n\n Your comment has been posted. Post another comment\n\t\n\t\n \n\t
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.\t \t \n\t
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.\n\t
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.\n \n
\t\t\n \n\t\t\n
\n\t \n \n
\n \n \n \n \n\n'; var entryPermalink = "http://economistsview.typepad.com/timduy/2011/05/patting-themselves-on-the-back.html"; var inlineReply = document.createElement("div"); var commentFooterLinks; var commentHeader; var commentReplyXID; var commentReplyAuthor; var commentReplyComplete; var inlineReplyLoaded = 0; var commentFormNum = undefined; /* Deprecated but still exists in advanced template sets, so must be defined */ function xidToCommentPermalink (entryUrl, xid) { return entryUrl + "?cid=" + xid + "#comment-" + xid; } /* Deprecated advanced template functions */ function handleSubmit() { return true; }; function handleChange() { return true; }; var TPToolbar = { src: "http://www.typepad.com/services/toolbar?blog_id=6a00d83451b33869e20111684285a2970c&asset_id=6a00d83451b33869e201538e8d225f970b&atype=Individual&to=http%3A%2F%2Feconomistsview.typepad.com%2Ftimduy%2F2011%2F05%2Fpatting-themselves-on-the-back.html&autofollowed=0", asset_xid: "6a00d83451b33869e201538e8d225f970b", bookmarklet_uri: "http://static.typepad.com/.shared/js/qp/loader-combined-min.js" }; var TYPEPAD___bookmarklet_domain = "http://www.typepad.com/"; Read Full Article »
