Does the Super Bowl Really Predict Market?

${Html.ActionLink("My MarketWatch", "index", new { controller = "composite", area = "section", page = "my" })} | !{Html.ActionLink("Sign out", "LogOff", new { area = "User", controller = "Account" }, new { id = "signOutLink" })}

Welcome, ${UserDisplayName}

Log in

Become a MarketWatch member today

Mark Hulbert Archives | Email alerts

Jan. 31, 2012, 12:01 a.m. EST

Want to see how this story relates to your portfolio?

Just add items to create a portfolio now:

Create Portfolio or Cancel Already have a portfolio? Log In

By Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch) "” Can the Super Bowl help you make more money this year?

Yes.

But that profit won't come from basing your investments on who wins this coming Sunday's game "” even if, per the veritable Super Bowl Predictor, the Giants win on Sunday and the market rises, or the Patriots win and the market falls.

On the contrary, Sunday's game can help us become better investors only if we use it to understand how almost any data set is vulnerable to being tortured into saying something meaningless.

/quotes/zigman/627449 DJIA 12,653.72, -6.74, -0.05%

The Super Bowl Predictor, for those of you who haven't heard of it, holds that stocks will rise over the coming year if the winning team can trace its roots back to the original National Football League "” and fall if that team's roots are in the old American Football League. Followers claim that the Indicator has an impressive 79% success rate.

There's less here than meets the eye, however "” even if we overlook the Predictor's spectacular failure the last time the Giants won the Super Bowl, in 2008. Far from rising, as it the indicator predicted, stocks turned in their worst year since the 1930s.

The problem with the Predictor's 79% success rate: It is artificially inflated by the indicator's especially good record in the late 1960s and early 1970s, which came before even the most diehard football fan ever dreamed of correlating the Super bowl winner with the stock market. The earliest mention in a mainstream publication of such a correlation, as far as I can determine, came in 1978 by the late Leonard Koppett, a sports writer for the New York Times.

Reuters New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning.

To properly judge the indicator's success, we should be focusing only on its record since then. Otherwise, we would be guilty of what statisticians refer to as hindsight bias. To put that in football terms, it's akin to Monday-morning quarterbacking.

Unfortunately for the indicator, its real-time success since 1978 has been less impressive "” 68%, in fact. While that might still seem much better than a coin flip, it isn't. A simple bet that the market would rise each year would have been right 76% of the time since 1978.

Another essential reality check that can help immunize us from being seduced by spurious correlations: Estimate how many others were tested during the process of "discovering" the one that now appears to be so impressive. We should never forget that, even at the 95% confidence level that statisticians use to conclude that a pattern is genuine, there will be five "false positives" out of every 100 apparent correlations.

This is a crucial point, given the millions of investors who constantly analyze the market's every squiggle and are correlating those squiggles with everything from sunspots to tea leaves.

To give one example: Consider another sports-related predictor, which also was popular in the 1970s. According to it, if the American League won the World Series in a presidential election year, then the Republican candidate would win the presidency, while the Democrat would win if the National League team won. Based on its "uncanny" success rate from 1952 through 1976, many began singing this indicator's praises.

It failed in 1980, however, and its record since then has been statistically indistinguishable from 50:50. Now hardly anyone but the old-timers have even heard of it.

Click to Play $(function () { $("#video_44843C4D-5BD2-4DD2-BF30-B3E07BB3253A").click(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); MarketWatch.Video.loadAndStartVideo('44843C4D-5BD2-4DD2-BF30-B3E07BB3253A', 'video_44843C4D-5BD2-4DD2-BF30-B3E07BB3253A', '287', '162'); }); }); Why market likes the Giants

For 36 of the 45 Super Bowls, the stock market has gone up after a win by an "original" National Football League team, and gone down when they lose. Does that mean everyone should root for the Giants? (Photo: Getty Images)

To be sure, hope springs eternal, and some believers in the Super Bowl Predictor will undoubtedly continue to believe in it "” my calm, reasoned prose notwithstanding. They will find apparently strong support for this belief in an article that appeared in the Spring 2010 issue of the Journal of Investing, written by George Kester, a finance professor at Washington & Lee University.

Kester measured the returns of a portfolio that switched between the market and cash according to the Super Bowl Predictor, and found that even in real time since the indicator was first publicized, this portfolio has beaten a buy-and-hold. So even if it's not statistically significant, it's economically significant.

Note carefully, however: Kester does not endorse the indicator. In an interview Monday afternoon, he told me that he thinks it's ridiculous for anyone to do so. On the contrary, one of his goals in conducting the study was to show how difficult it is to beat a buy-and-hold.

Is Kester nevertheless hoping that the Giants will win on Sunday, I asked him? Laughing, he said "yes," acknowledging that maybe even he was unconsciously believing that a win by an old NFL team would be better for the stock market than a win by an old AFL team.

Click here to learn more about the Hulbert Financial Digest.

//$(document).ready(function() { var storywidth = $('#mainstory').width(); var maxwidth = storywidth; $('#maincontent pre').each(function (index, value) { var thiswidth = $(value).width(); if (thiswidth > maxwidth) maxwidth = thiswidth; }); var offset = maxwidth - storywidth; if (offset > 0) { var margin = 13; var blanketwidth = $('#blanket').width(); var contentwidth = $('#maincontent').width(); $('#blanket').width(blanketwidth + offset + margin); $('#maincontent').width(contentwidth + offset + margin); $('#mainstory').width(storywidth + offset + margin); } //});

Mark Hulbert is the founder of Hulbert Financial Digest in Annandale, Va. He has been tracking the advice of more than 160 financial newsletters since 1980.

var OB_permalink= 'http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-wall-street-is-rooting-for-the-giants-2012-01-31'; var OB_Template="marketwatch"; var OB_widgetId= 'AR_1'; var OB_langJS ='http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js'; if ( typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined' ) OutbrainStart(); else { var OB_Script = true; var str = ""; document.write(str); } Comment on this story 1 Comment Most Popular Therese Poletti's Tech Tales

Facebook IPO is the talk of Silicon Valley

1. Paul B. Farrell

Short China: Its commodities bubble is set to pop

2. Asia Markets

Most Asia markets rise; Taipei, Hong Kong gain

3. David Weidner's Writing on the Wall

Davos is just an ego trip for the 1%

4. Earnings Outlook

Kindle may set Fire to Amazon's results

5. Join the Conversation 1 Comments 1,000 characters My comments... Community guidelines » Add Comment Breaking Insight David Weidner's Writing on the Wall

Davos is just an ego trip for the 1%

Therese Poletti's Tech Tales

Facebook IPO is the talk of Silicon Valley

Irwin Kellner

It's the fiscal policy, stupid

Paul B. Farrell

Short China: Its commodities bubble is set to pop

Find a Broker Partner Center » Video

Asia Week Ahead: Electronics Giants Post Earnings

U.S. Week Ahead: Exxon, Amazon, jobs

Investors, Skip the 'January Indicator' for Stocks

Tax-Time Confusion over Reporting Capital Gains

About Mark Hulbert RSS News feed

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD... Expand

Mark Hulbert is editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest, which since 1980 has been tracking the performance of hundreds of investment advisors. The HFD became a service of MarketWatch in April 2002. In addition to being a Senior Columnist for MarketWatch, Hulbert writes a monthly column for Barron's.com and a column on investment strategies for the Journal of the American Association of Individual Investors. A frequent guest on television and radio shows, you may have seen Hulbert on CNBC, Wall Street Week, or ABC's World News This Morning. Most recently, Dow Jones and MarketWatch launched a new weekly newsletter based on Hulbert's research, entitled Hulbert on Markets: What's Working Now. Collapse

More from Mark Hulbert As goes January, so goes the year? How to catch a falling knife A leading indicator of a higher market? Market as undervalued today as in 1990 Exploiting munis' abnormally high yields Featured Commentary » Next: Irwin Kellner

Irwin Kellner

The Economist's Corner

It's the fiscal policy, stupid

Next: David Weidner's Writing on the Wall

David Weidner

Writing on the Wall

Davos is just an ego trip for the 1%

Next: Jeanette Pavini's Buyer Beware

Jeanette Pavini

Buyer Beware

Jobless grads fight loan fees

Next: Paul B. Farrell

Paul B. Farrell

Behavioral Economics

China's commodities bubble is set to pop

Next: Therese Poletti's Tech Tales

Therese Poletti

Tech Tales

Facebook IPO is the talk of Silicon Valley

Next: Mark Hulbert

Mark Hulbert

On the Markets

Why Wall Street is rooting for the Giants

Next: Lawrence G. McMillan

Lawrence G. McMillan

Overbought market still has bullish potential

Next: Chuck Jaffe

Chuck Jaffe

Mutual Funds

Stable-value funds are shaky 401(k) options

Next: Amy Hoak's Home Economics

Amy Hoak

Home Economics

It may be a good time to buy, but not to sell

Next: Craig Stephen's This Week in China

Craig Stephen

This Week in China

Apple wrestles with its "?China problem'

Next: Peter Brimelow

Peter Brimelow

Wall Street Irregulars

Gold bull methodically takes profits

WSJ WSJ MarketWatch MarketWatch Facebook Twitter Barron's Barron's SmartMoney SmartMoney AllThingsDigital AllThingsDigital FINS FINS More BigCharts Virtual Stock Exchange Financial News WSJ Asia WSJ India WSJ China chinese edition WSJ Japan japanese edition WSJ Europe WSJ Deutschland WSJ Americas en Español em Português WSJ Radio WSJ Wine SEARCH 5:19 AM EST January 31, 2012 /marketstate/country/us New York Closed /marketstate/country/uk London Open /marketstate/country/jp Tokyo Closed /marketstate/country/us   /marketstate/country/uk   /marketstate/country/jp   View All Latest News /news/latest 4:54a

European markets edge higher on EU pact

4:22a

Banks might double ECB emergency loans: report

3:34a

Most Asia markets rise; Taipei, Hong Kong gain

3:16a

Europe stocks open higher, led by banks, ARM

3:14a

Santander profit falls short; takes â?¬3.18B charge

3:03a

ARM Holdings up 4.6% after results

3:03a

German DAX 30 index up 0.7% to 6,487.30

3:02a

Banco Santander up 1.5% after results

3:01a

French CAC 40 index up 1% to 3,298.57

3:01a

FTSE 100 index up 0.7% to 5,712.95

3:01a

Stoxx Europe 600 index up 0.6% to 253.95

2:42a

Banco Santander 4Q net interest income EUR7.97B

2:41a

Banco Santander 4Q net profit EUR47 million

2:38a

Euro gains on Greek hopes; yen extends climb

2:31a

ARM posts profit of 33 million as sales rise 21%

2:14a

Morgan Stanley buys Fairfax Media stake: report

2:12a

ARM: FY dollar revenues seen at just over $860M

2:11a

ARM: Global uncertainy could hit industry sales

2:09a

ARM Holdings 4Q sales 137.8 million pounds

2:08a

ARM Holdings Q4 net profit 33 million pounds

Loading more headlines... dow /quotes/zigman/627449 12,653.72 -6.74 -0.05% nasdaq /quotes/zigman/123127 2,811.94 +6.66 +0.24% s&p 500 /quotes/zigman/3870025 1,313.01 -3.32 -0.25% Kiosk 1326845100000 1326931800000

The Trading Deck

Michael A. Gayed Fed paranoia is bullish...for now The possibility for anything inflation-sensitive to do well now exists because the conditions favor a return to higher inflation. /conga/kiosk/trading-deck-2.html 189875 1309370400000 1309428000000

SportsWatch

Super Bowl ads go social Facebook app will let members exchange and discuss ads during NFL championship broadcast. "¢ MarketWatch's sports coverage

 

/conga/kiosk/wildcard4.html 189748 1325088600000 1325142000000

Asian Currencies

Can gold save the rupee? India's currency suffered a heavy drop last year and some say gold is to blame. "¢ International yuan | Irrepressible  yen "¢ Aussie may fall before it rises /conga/kiosk/wildcard2.html 189750 1310436000000 1310436000000

Games

Pick ... trade ... win! Join MarketWatch's quarterly earnings-focused stock competition. Beat thepros and MarketWatch experts to win prizes.  "¢ Week 3 results: Winning with Netflix /conga/kiosk/games.html 189870 1309191300000 1309248000000

2012 Tax Guide

How you can file for free You can go with the IRS's Free File Alliance or directly to top tax-prep sites, many of which offer free basic services. "¢ Top tax sites online: How to choose /conga/kiosk/wildcard3.html 189703 1326382200000 1326413400000

The Trading Deck

MEENA KRISHNAMSETTY Six stocks to buy now Goldman Sachs names six stocks to consider buying now, alongside two stocks that look like good sell candidates. Get the details here. /conga/kiosk/trading-deck-1.html 189878 MarketWatch.com Site Index Topics Help Feedback Newsroom Roster Media Archive Premium Products Mobile Company Info Code of Conduct Corrections Advertising Media Kit Advertise Locally License our Content Broker Center Your Ad Choices MarketWatch on Facebook MarketWatch on Twitter RSS Podcasts WSJ.com Barron's Online BigCharts Virtual Stock Exchange All Things Digital MarketWatch Community Financial News Online WSJ.com Small Business FINS: Finance, IT jobs, Sales jobs Read Full Article »




Related Articles

Market Overview
Search Stock Quotes